Miomir Kecmanovic and Kyle Edmund will play each other in the semifinal of the New York Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 4:00 pm on STADIUM COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyle Edmund is the pick to win this match.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.72
Miomir Kecmanovic -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Miomir Kecmanovic vs. Kyle Edmund
There is no head to head record between Miomir Kecmanovic and Kyle Edmund since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Miomir Kecmanovic
Ranked no. 54, Kecmanovic reached the semifinal after defeating Tommy Paul 6-4 6-2, Paolo Lorenzi 6-3 6-3 and Ugo Humbert 3-6 6-2 6-4.
In the quarter against Humbert, Miomir recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-4). During the match Kecmanovic scored 80 points vs Humbert’s 77. Miomir was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Kecmanovic blasted 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Miomir Kecmanovic lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kecmanovic put 67% of his first serves in, winning 77% (41/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (12/26) on the 2nd serve. Miomir broke Humbert 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Miomir has lost 1 set in this competition to win 54% of the points he played.
Kecmanovic has a weak win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 43% of his matches (58-43). 3-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kecmanovic has a 122-82 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Kecmanovic’s best result of the current season was reaching the semi-finals in Doha.
Miomir has a 7-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in New York
Miomir didn’t compete in New York in 2019.
Kyle Edmund
Ranked no. 62, Kyle reached the semifinal after beating Yasutaka Uchiyama 7-5 6-4, Dominik Koepfer 6-2 6-4 and Soon-Woo Kwon 3-6 6-2 7-65.
In the quarter against Kwon, Edmund recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 7-65). During the match Edmund scored 86 points vs Kwon’s 84. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Edmund blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Kyle Edmund lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Edmund put 66% of his first serves in, winning 75% (44/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Kwon 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kyle has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Edmund has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 75% of his matches (191-65). 3-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Edmund has a 235-154 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
Kyle has a 5-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in New York
Edmund didn’t compete in New York in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kecmanovic | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 63 | 70 |
| Pts | 209-178 | 234-213 |
| Total Points | 387 | 447 |
| Winners | 87 | 111 |
| %Winners | 42% | 47% |
Both Kecmanovic and Edmund played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Miomir Kecmanovic conceded 1 set, while Kyle Edmund dropper 1 set. Talking about their workload, Kecmanovic and Edmund have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Kecmanovic played 7 games less than Edmund. The Serbian scored 87 winners (42% on total points). On the other side, The Brit blasted 111 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kecmanovic | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 2.7 | 4 |
| 1st in | 112/187 | 148/244 |
| %1st in | 60% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 87/112 | 111/148 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 37/75 | 45/96 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 47% |
Kecmanovic blasted 8 aces (2.7 per match). Edmund blasted 12 aces (4 per match). Kecmanovic won 78% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Edmund won 75% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kecmanovic | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 10 |
| Converted | 11/22 | 10/21 |
| % Converted | 50% | 48% |
| Conceded | 12 | 19 |
| Saved | 9 | 14 |
| % Saved | 75% | 74% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
The Serbian broke his opponents 11 times with 50% conversion rate. Kecmanovic conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 10 times with 48% conversion rate. Kyle conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kecmanovic | |||||
| R1 Paul |
R2 Lorenzi |
1/4 Humbert |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | 27 | 63 | |
| pts | 70-55 | 59-46 | 80-77 | 209-178 | |
| Total points | 125 | 105 | 157 | 387 | |
| Winners | 25 | 21 | 41 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | 51% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/53 | 26/55 | 53/79 | 112/187 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 47% | 67% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/33 | 21/26 | 41/53 | 87/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 81% | 77% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 15/29 | 12/26 | 37/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 52% | 46% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/6 | 3/5 | 11/22 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 67% | 60% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 2/3 | 4/5 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 67% | 80% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Edmund | |||||
| R1 Uchiyama |
R2 Koepfer |
1/4 Kwon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | 3-6 6-2 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 | 30 | 70 | |
| pts | 77-68 | 71-61 | 86-84 | 234-213 | |
| Total points | 145 | 132 | 170 | 447 | |
| Winners | 30 | 37 | 44 | 111 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 52% | 51% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 7 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 35/71 | 54/83 | 59/90 | 148/244 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 65% | 66% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 37/54 | 44/59 | 111/148 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 69% | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 13/29 | 15/31 | 45/96 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 45% | 48% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/7 | 3/6 | 10/21 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 57% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 8 | 5 | 19 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 7/8 | 2/5 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 88% | 40% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 3 | 67 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLWW
LLWWLWLWWW Tennis Scores in New York
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Ugo HumbertHumbert (3-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (3-6 6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (3-6 6-2 7-6(5)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Andreas SeppiSeppi (0-2) – See H2H details
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Kyle EdmundEdmund (0-0) – See H2H details
