Michael Mmoh and Mikael Torpegaard will play each other in the 3rd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 6:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Mmoh is the pick to win this match.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.33
Mikael Torpegaard -> 3.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Mikael Torpegaard
This will be the 3rd time that Michael Mmoh and Mikael Torpegaard play each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Mmoh (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Mmoh won 7-5 6-3 in the semifinal in the Columbus Challenger back in 2018.
Michael Mmoh
Ranked no. 192, the American reached the semifinal after defeating Brandon Nakashima 7-62 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Mmoh had a good straight sets win against Nakashima (7-62 6-2). During the match Mmoh scored 65 points vs Nakashima’s 48. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Mmoh blasted 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Michael Mmoh was extremely effective on serve to win 86% (32/37) of his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Mmoh broke Nakashima 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Mmoh has a weak record in the last 8 years having won 32% of his matches (198-94). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mmoh has a 126-97 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Mmoh has a 6-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Cleveland Challenger
The American didn’t play in the Cleveland Challenger in 2019.
Mikael Torpegaard
Ranked no. 234, Torpegaard reached the semifinal after beating Aleksandar Kovacevic 6-2 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Torpegaard had a good straight sets win against Kovacevic (6-2 6-3). During the match Torpegaard scored 69 points vs Kovacevic’s 54. Mikael was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Torpegaard blasted 14 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Mikael Torpegaard conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Torpegaard put 57% of his first serves in, winning 83% (25/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (11/23) on the 2nd serve. Mikael broke Kovacevic 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Torpegaard has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (60-41). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Torpegaard has a 38-28 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Mikael has a 1-3 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Cleveland Challenger
Mikael didn’t play in the Cleveland Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mmoh | Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 17 |
| Pts | 65-48 | 69-54 |
| Total Points | 113 | 123 |
| Winners | 32 | 25 |
| %Winners | 49% | 36% |
Both Mmoh and Torpegaard played 1 matche. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mmoh and Torpegaard have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mmoh played 4 games more than Torpegaard. The American scored 32 winners (49% on total points). On the other side, The Dane blasted 25 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mmoh | Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 14 |
| 1st in | 37/49 | 30/53 |
| %1st in | 76% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 32/37 | 25/30 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 11/23 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 48% |
Mmoh blasted 8 aces . Torpegaard blasted 14 aces . Mmoh won 86% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Torpegaard won 83% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mmoh | Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 4/13 |
| % Converted | 33% | 31% |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with 33% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Dane broke his opponent 4 times with 31% conversion rate. Torpegaard was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Mmoh | |||
| R2 Nakashima |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 65-48 | 65-48 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 37/49 | 37/49 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 32/37 | 32/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | |
| Torpegaard | |||
| R2 Kovacevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 69-54 | 69-54 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 14 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 30/53 | 30/53 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/23 | 11/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | -100 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLLLLW
Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Sekou BangouraBangoura (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Thomaz BellucciBellucci – Roberto CidCid (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-3 6-72 6-3) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Guilherme ClezarClezar (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Raymond SarmientoSarmiento – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Donald YoungYoung (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jc AragoneAragone – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Sekou BangouraBangoura (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-4 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Thomaz BellucciBellucci – Roberto CidCid (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-1 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-3 6-7(2) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Denis KudlaKudla – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – See H2H details
- Raymond SarmientoSarmiento – Jc AragoneAragone (1-1) – See H2H details
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-1) – See H2H details
- Michael MmohMmoh – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (2-0) – See H2H details
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – See H2H details
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – See H2H details
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Ryan HarrisonHarrison (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jeff WolfWolf – Thomaz BellucciBellucci (0-0) – See H2H details
