Denis Kudla and Jurij Rodionov will square off in the final of the Dallas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 2:00 pm on HAMILTON FAMILY STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Denis Kudla who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Denis Kudla is the pick to win this match.
Denis Kudla -> 1.61
Jurij Rodionov -> 2.20
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Denis Kudla vs. Jurij Rodionov
There is no head to head record between Denis Kudla and Jurij Rodionov since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Denis Kudla
Ranked no. 113, Denis got to the final after defeating Michael Redlicki 6-2 7-62, Mitchell Krueger 4-6 6-3 6-4, Frances Tiafoe 6-4 7-66 and Emilio Gomez 6-4 6-4.
In the semifinal, Denis had a good straight sets win against Gomez (6-4 6-4). During the match Kudla scored 70 points vs Gomez’s 49. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Kudla blasted 6 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Denis Kudla was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (26/32) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Kudla broke Gomez 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Denis has lost 1 set in this event to win 55% of the points he played.
Kudla has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 65% of his matches (396-210). 4-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kudla has a 322-243 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
Denis’s best result of the season was reaching the semi-finals in the Canberra Challenger and the Dallas Challenger.
Kudla has a 8-2 win-loss record in 2020, 4-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Dallas Challenger
The American didn’t compete in the Dallas Challenger in 2019.
Jurij Rodionov
Ranked no. 362, Jurij got to the final after beating Roberto Cid 7-65 6-3, Andreas Seppi 6-3 6-4, Michael Mmoh 6-74 6-2 6-1, Joao Menezes 6-4 6-4 and Dominik Koepfer 7-67 6-2.
In the semifinal, The Austrian had a good straight sets win against Koepfer (7-67 6-2). During the match Rodionov scored 78 points vs Koepfer’s 64. The Austrian was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Rodionov blasted 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jurij Rodionov was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Austrian broke Koepfer 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Rodionov has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Rodionov has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 73% of his matches (66-24). 5-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Rodionov has a 62-35 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Rodionov’s best result of the year was reaching the semi-finals in the Dallas Challenger.
Jurij has a 5-2 win-loss record in 2020, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Dallas Challenger
Jurij didn’t play in the Dallas Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kudla | Rodionov |
---|---|---|
Match played | 4 | 5 |
Tot Set | 9 | 11 |
Tot Games | 93 | 110 |
Pts | 321-267 | 393-334 |
Total Points | 588 | 727 |
Winners | 128 | 183 |
%Winners | 40% | 47% |
Kudla played 4 matches while Rodionov competed in 5 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Denis Kudla conceded 1 set, while Jurij Rodionov dropper 1 set. Kudla has played 2 sets less than Rodionov (9 vs 11). Therefore, Kudla played 17 games less than Rodionov. The American scored 128 winners (40% on total points). On the other side, Rodionov blasted 183 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kudla | Rodionov |
---|---|---|
Aces | 40 | 30 |
Avg per match | 10 | 6 |
1st in | 156/278 | 238/378 |
%1st in | 56% | 63% |
1st pts | 128/156 | 183/238 |
%1st pts | 82% | 77% |
2nd pts | 62/122 | 69/140 |
%2nd pts | 51% | 49% |
Kudla blasted 40 aces (10 per match). Rodionov blasted 30 aces (6 per match). Kudla won 82% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Rodionov won 77% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kudla | Rodionov |
---|---|---|
Won | 12 | 15 |
Converted | 12/32 | 15/38 |
% Converted | 38% | 39% |
Conceded | 19 | 21 |
Saved | 13 | 17 |
% Saved | 68% | 81% |
Times Broken | 6 | 4 |
Kudla broke his opponents 12 times with 38% conversion rate. Kudla conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded. Rodionov broke his opponents 15 times with 39% conversion rate. The Austrian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded.
Kudla | ||||||
R2 Redlicki |
R3 Krueger |
1/4 Tiafoe |
1/2 Gomez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-62 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 7-66 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 29 | 23 | 20 | 93 | |
pts | 77-55 | 100-86 | 74-77 | 70-49 | 321-267 | |
Total points | 132 | 186 | 151 | 119 | 588 | |
Winners | 29 | 41 | 32 | 26 | 128 | |
%Winners | 38% | 41% | 43% | 37% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 11 | 16 | 7 | 6 | 40 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | |
1st in | 36/65 | 45/87 | 43/77 | 32/49 | 156/278 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 52% | 56% | 65% | 56% | |
1st pts | 29/36 | 41/45 | 32/43 | 26/32 | 128/156 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 91% | 74% | 81% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 16/29 | 22/42 | 14/34 | 10/17 | 62/122 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 52% | 41% | 59% | 51% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 2/6 | 3/6 | 4/12 | 12/32 | |
Converted % | 38% | 33% | 50% | 33% | 38% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 19 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5/6 | 2/4 | 1/3 | 13 | |
Saved % | 83% | 83% | 50% | 33% | 62% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 50 |
Rodionov | |||||||
R1 Cid |
R2 Seppi |
R3 Mmoh |
1/4 Lucas Magalhaes Hueb De Menezes |
1/2 Koepfer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-65 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-74 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-67 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 19 | 28 | 20 | 21 | 110 | |
pts | 70-59 | 69-57 | 108-91 | 68-63 | 78-64 | 393-334 | |
Total points | 129 | 126 | 199 | 131 | 142 | 727 | |
Winners | 37 | 33 | 45 | 35 | 33 | 183 | |
%Winners | 53% | 48% | 42% | 51% | 42% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 3 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 30 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 13 | |
1st in | 47/68 | 37/66 | 59/97 | 49/74 | 46/73 | 238/378 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 56% | 61% | 66% | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 37/47 | 33/37 | 45/59 | 35/49 | 33/46 | 183/238 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 89% | 76% | 71% | 72% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 13/21 | 10/29 | 21/38 | 10/25 | 15/27 | 69/140 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 34% | 55% | 40% | 56% | 49% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 3/10 | 4/12 | 3/4 | 3/7 | 15/38 | |
Converted % | 40% | 30% | 33% | 75% | 43% | 39% | |
Conceded | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 21 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 4/5 | 4/4 | 4/5 | 3/4 | 17 | |
Saved % | 67% | 80% | 100% | 80% | 75% | 101% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -20 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches
- Denis KudlaKudla – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – See H2H details