Jason Jung and Emilio Gomez will face off in the 3rd round of the Dallas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on HAMILTON FAMILY STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Jung who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Jung is the pick to win this match.
Jason Jung -> 1.50
Emilio Gomez -> 2.50
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Emilio Gomez
There is no head to head record between Jason Jung and Emilio Gomez since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jason Jung
Ranked no. 128, Jung got to the 3rd round after defeating Kevin King 7-64 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Jason had a good straight sets win against King (7-64 6-4). During the match Jung scored 84 points vs King’s 73. Jason was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Jung blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jason Jung was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (31/43) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Jung broke King 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
Jung has a weak record in the last 9 years having won 39% of his matches (135-86). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Jung has a 173-153 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Jung has a 2-3 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Dallas Challenger
The Chinese didn’t play in the Dallas Challenger in 2019.
Emilio Gomez
Ranked no. 156, Gomez reached the 3rd round after beating Maxime Cressy 6-3 4-6 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Gomez defeated Cressy (6-3 4-6 6-3). During the match Gomez scored 85 points vs Cressy’s 79. The Ecuadorian was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Gomez blasted 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Emilio Gomez was extremely effective on serve to win 76% (42/55) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Ecuadorian broke Cressy 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Gomez has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 66% of his matches (42-22). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gomez has a 114-117 win-loss record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
Gomez has a 1-3 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Dallas Challenger
Emilio didn’t compete in the Dallas Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jung | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 28 |
| Pts | 84-73 | 85-79 |
| Total Points | 157 | 164 |
| Winners | 31 | 42 |
| %Winners | 37% | 49% |
Both Jung and Gomez played 1 matche. At the moment, Emilio Gomez lost 1 set while Jason Jung hasn’t lost a set so far. Jung has played 1 sets less than Gomez (2 vs 3). Therefore, Jung played 5 games less than Gomez. Jung scored 31 winners (37% on total points). On the other side, The Ecuadorian blasted 42 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jung | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 43/67 | 55/82 |
| %1st in | 64% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 31/43 | 42/55 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 15/27 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 56% |
Jung blasted 3 aces . Gomez blasted 4 aces . Jung won 72% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Gomez won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jung | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/13 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 23% | 43% |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Jung broke his opponent 3 times with 23% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Ecuadorian broke his opponent 3 times with 43% conversion rate. Gomez conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jung | |||
| R2 King |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 84-73 | 84-73 | |
| Total points | 157 | 157 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/67 | 43/67 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 31/43 | 31/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/13 | 3/13 | |
| Converted % | 23% | 23% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 100 | |
| Gomez | |||
| R2 Cressy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 85-79 | 85-79 | |
| Total points | 164 | 164 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 55/82 | 55/82 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 42/55 | 42/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLW
LLLLLLWWLW Tennis Scores in Dallas Challenger
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Ulises BlanchBlanch (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bradley KlahnKlahn – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Thomaz BellucciBellucci (6-77 6-4 7-69) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (6-2 4-6 7-62) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Donald YoungYoung (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Sekou BangouraBangoura (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (3-6 6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Bernard TomicTomic (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Maxime CressyCressy (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Andreas SeppiSeppi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Brayden SchnurSchnur (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Kevin KingKing (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Aleksandar VukicVukic (4-6 7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Thomaz BellucciBellucci (6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(9)) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Michael RedlickiRedlicki (6-2 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Donald YoungYoung (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Denis IstominIstomin – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-0) – See H2H details
- Emilio GomezGomez – Jason JungJung (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Denis KudlaKudla (0-4) – See H2H details
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – See H2H details
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Bradley KlahnKlahn (0-0) – See H2H details
- Michael MmohMmoh – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – See H2H details
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – See H2H details
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – See H2H details
