Duckhee Lee and Borna Gojo will play each other in the 3rd round of the Launceston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Borna Gojo is the pick to win this match.
Borna Gojo -> 1.44
Duckhee Lee -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Duckhee Lee vs. Borna Gojo
There is no head to head record between Duckhee Lee and Borna Gojo since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Duckhee Lee
Ranked no. 222, Hee Lee reached the 3rd round after beating Calum Puttergill 6-4 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Korean had a good straight sets win against Puttergill (6-4 6-1). During the match Hee Lee scored 67 points vs Puttergill’s 50. The Korean was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Hee Lee scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Duckhee Lee lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Hee Lee put 64% of his first serves in, winning 49% (19/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. Hee Lee broke Puttergill 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
Hee Lee has a unfavourable record in the last 8 years having won 49% of his matches (425-405). 3-3 on hard in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hee Lee has a 119-126 record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Korean has a 3-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Launceston Challenger
Hee Lee didn’t compete in the Launceston Challenger in 2019.
Borna Gojo
Ranked no. 273, the Croatian reached the 3rd round after beating Evan Song 6-0 6-77 7-5 and Steven Diez 7-5 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Borna had a good straight sets win against Diez (7-5 6-2). During the match Gojo scored 80 points vs Diez’s 65. Borna was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Gojo blasted 8 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Borna Gojo was extremely effective on serve to win 71% (34/48) of his 1st serve and 52% (13/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Gojo broke Diez 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gojo has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Gojo has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 62% of his matches (76-46). 5-3 on hard in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gojo has a 33-22 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Borna has a 5-3 win-loss record in 2020, 5-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Launceston Challenger
Borna didn’t compete in the Launceston Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hee Lee | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 51 |
| Pts | 67-50 | 187-149 |
| Total Points | 117 | 336 |
| Winners | 19 | 76 |
| %Winners | 28% | 41% |
Hee Lee played 1 match while Gojo competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Borna Gojo lost 1 set while Duckhee Lee hasn’t lost a set so far. Hee Lee has played 3 sets less than Gojo (2 vs 5). Therefore, Hee Lee played 34 games less than Gojo. Duck scored 19 winners (28% on total points). On the other side, Borna blasted 76 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hee Lee | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 7.5 |
| 1st in | 39/61 | 101/157 |
| %1st in | 64% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 19/39 | 76/101 |
| %1st pts | 49% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 30/56 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 54% |
Hee Lee blasted 1 ace . Gojo also blasted 15 aces (7.5 per match). Hee Lee won 49% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 75% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hee Lee | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 10 |
| Converted | 7/13 | 10/24 |
| % Converted | 54% | 42% |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 |
| Saved | 5 | 6 |
| % Saved | 56% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
The Korean broke his opponent 7 times with 54% conversion rate. The Korean conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. Borna broke his opponents 10 times with 42% conversion rate. The Croatian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hee Lee | |||
| R2 Puttergill |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/61 | 39/61 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 19/39 | 19/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 49% | 49% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 300 | |
| Gojo | ||||
| R1 Song |
R2 Diez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-77 7-5 | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 20 | 51 | |
| pts | 107-84 | 80-65 | 187-149 | |
| Total points | 191 | 145 | 336 | |
| Winners | 42 | 34 | 76 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 8 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 53/84 | 48/73 | 101/157 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 66% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 42/53 | 34/48 | 76/101 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 71% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 13/25 | 30/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 52% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 4/9 | 10/24 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 44% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 50 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWLL
WWWWWWWLLW Tennis Scores in Launceston Challenger
- Borna GojoGojo – Steven DiezDiez (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Akira SantillanSantillan (6-2 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Tobias SimonSimon (6-4 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Harry BourchierBourchier – Max PurcellPurcell (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Blake MottMott – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Blaz KavcicKavcic (0-6 7-5 7-67) – See score progression
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Duckhee LeeLee – Calum PuttergillPuttergill (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Ryota TanumaTanuma (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (7-61 6-0) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Dayne KellyKelly (7-68 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin LockLock – Julian LenzLenz (6-2 5-7 7-63) – See score progression
- Liam CaruanaCaruana – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Jacob GrillsGrills (4-6 6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte – Tatsuma ItoIto (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Viktor GalovicGalovic (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Blake MottMott – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – See H2H details
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – See H2H details
- Harry BourchierBourchier – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-1) – See H2H details
- Benjamin LockLock – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – See H2H details
- Blake MottMott – Liam BroadyBroady (0-1) – See H2H details
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (0-0) – See H2H details
- Borna GojoGojo – Duckhee LeeLee (0-0) – See H2H details
- Liam CaruanaCaruana – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – See H2H details
