Lukas Lacko and Cem Ilkel will square off in the semifinal of the the Quimper Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 4:30 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lukas Lacko who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lukas Lacko is the pick to win this match.
Lukas Lacko -> 1.57
Cem Ilkel -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lukas Lacko vs. Cem Ilkel
This will be the 3rd time that Lukas Lacko and Cem Ilkel clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Lacko and Ilkel (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Ilkel won 6-4 6-3 in the quarter in Izmir Challenger back in 2016.
Lukas Lacko
Ranked no. 178, the Slovakian got to the quarter after beating Andrea Arnaboldi 7-611 4-6 6-3, Roberto Ortega-Olmedo 6-2 6-2 and Mischa Zverev 6-73 6-2 6-4.
In the quarter against Zverev, The Slovakian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-2 6-4). During the match Lacko scored 96 points vs Zverev’s 83. Lacko was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Lacko blasted 11 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Lukas Lacko was extremely effective on serve to win 78% (38/49) of his 1st serve and 70% (28/40) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lukas broke Zverev 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lacko has dropped 2 set in this tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Lacko has a good record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (358-285). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lacko has a 286-232 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
The Slovakian has a 3-2 win-loss record in 2020, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
Lacko didn’t play in the Quimper Challenger in 2019.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 266, Cem reached the quarter after beating Viktor Durasovic 4-6 6-4 6-4, Danilo Petrovic 7-66 3-1 ret., Constant Lestienne 4-6 7-5 6-3 and Vit Kopriva 6-2 6-71 6-1.
In the quarter, The Turk defeated Kopriva (6-2 6-71 6-1). During the match Ilkel scored 101 points vs Kopriva’s 87. Ilkel was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilkel blasted 14 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Cem Ilkel lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Ilkel put 68% of his first serves in, winning 69% (44/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. Ilkel broke Kopriva 7 times after converting 41% of his break points (7/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ilkel has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Ilkel has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (67-50). 6-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ilkel has a 63-78 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Ilkel has a 7-3 win-loss record in 2020, 6-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
The Turk didn’t play in the Quimper Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lacko | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 79 | 89 |
| Pts | 266-234 | 299-284 |
| Total Points | 500 | 583 |
| Winners | 117 | 145 |
| %Winners | 44% | 48% |
Both Lacko and Ilkel played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Lukas Lacko conceded 2 sets, while Cem Ilkel dropper 3 sets. Lacko has played 1 sets less than Ilkel (8 vs 9). Therefore, Lacko played 10 games less than Ilkel. The Slovakian scored 117 winners (44% on total points). On the other side, Ilkel blasted 145 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lacko | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 34 | 35 |
| Avg per match | 11.3 | 11.7 |
| 1st in | 151/247 | 203/304 |
| %1st in | 61% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 117/151 | 145/203 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 55/96 | 45/101 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 45% |
Lacko blasted 34 aces (11.3 per match). Ilkel blasted 35 aces (11.7 per match). Lacko won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 71% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lacko | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 14 |
| Converted | 9/19 | 14/37 |
| % Converted | 47% | 38% |
| Conceded | 7 | 19 |
| Saved | 5 | 12 |
| % Saved | 71% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 7 |
The Slovakian broke his opponents 9 times with 47% conversion rate. The Slovakian conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. The Turk broke his opponents 14 times with 38% conversion rate. Ilkel conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lacko | |||||
| R2 Arnaboldi |
R3 Ortega-Olmedo |
1/4 Zverev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-611 4-6 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-73 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 16 | 31 | 79 | |
| pts | 110-108 | 60-43 | 96-83 | 266-234 | |
| Total points | 218 | 103 | 179 | 500 | |
| Winners | 56 | 23 | 38 | 117 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 38% | 40% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 17 | 6 | 11 | 34 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 74/115 | 28/43 | 49/89 | 151/247 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 65% | 55% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 56/74 | 23/28 | 38/49 | 117/151 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 82% | 78% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/41 | 6/15 | 28/40 | 55/96 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 40% | 70% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 5 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 5/11 | 3/4 | 9/19 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 45% | 75% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 0/1 | 3/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 0% | 100% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | -33 | |
| Ilkel | ||||||
| R1 Durasovic |
R2 Petrovic |
R3 Lestienne |
1/4 Kopriva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 7-66 3-1 ret. | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | 6-2 6-71 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 17 | 31 | 28 | 106 | |
| pts | 101-96 | 59-52 | 97-101 | 101-87 | 358-336 | |
| Total points | 197 | 111 | 198 | 188 | 694 | |
| Winners | 55 | 21 | 46 | 44 | 166 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 36% | 47% | 44% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 13 | 7 | 8 | 14 | 42 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 72/100 | 36/55 | 67/110 | 64/94 | 239/359 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 65% | 61% | 68% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 55/72 | 21/36 | 46/67 | 44/64 | 166/239 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 58% | 69% | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 15/19 | 18/43 | 14/30 | 60/120 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 79% | 42% | 47% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 16 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/4 | 5/12 | 7/17 | 16/41 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 50% | 42% | 41% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 22 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 2/3 | 4/8 | 2/4 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 67% | 50% | 50% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 100 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWLLLW Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Matthias BachingerBachinger (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-2 6-71 6-1) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-73 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Matthias BachingerBachinger (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-7(3) 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-1) – See H2H details
- Lukas LackoLacko – Cem IlkelIlkel (1-1) – See H2H details
