Taro Daniel and Jay Clarke will clash against each other in the semifinal of the the Burnie Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 2:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Taro Daniel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Taro Daniel is the pick to win this match.
Taro Daniel -> 1.53
Jay Clarke -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Taro Daniel vs. Jay Clarke
There is no head to head record between Taro Daniel and Jay Clarke since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Taro Daniel
Ranked no. 110, Taro got to the semifinal after beating Yuta Shimizu 7-64 7-65, Tung-Lin Wu 6-4 6-4 and Mohamed Safwat 6-3 6-2.
In the quarter, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Safwat (6-3 6-2). During the match Daniel scored 73 points vs Safwat’s 52. Daniel was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Daniel blasted 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Taro Daniel was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (33/42) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Daniel broke Safwat 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Taro hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Daniel has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (517-439). 4-2 on hard in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Daniel has a 253-193 win-loss record in the last 10 years on hard.
The Japanese has a 4-2 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Burnie Challenger
Taro didn’t play in the Burnie Challenger in 2019.
Jay Clarke
Ranked no. 155, Clarke reached the semifinal after beating Brydan Klein 1-6 6-3 6-4, Daniel Altmaier 6-1 6-75 6-4 and Alex Bolt 4-6 7-5 6-2.
In the quarter against Bolt, Jay recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-2). During the match Clarke scored 99 points vs Bolt’s 77. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Clarke blasted 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jay Clarke was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (33/43) of his 1st serve and 67% (28/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Brit broke Bolt 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Clarke has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 51% of his matches (62-59). 3-2 on hard in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Clarke has a 43-51 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Jay has a 3-2 win-loss record in 2020, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Burnie Challenger
Jay had to bow in the semifinal 6-4 6-4 to Steven Diez.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Daniel | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 63 | 86 |
| Pts | 228-191 | 288-241 |
| Total Points | 419 | 529 |
| Winners | 97 | 100 |
| %Winners | 43% | 35% |
Both Daniel and Clarke played 3 matches. At the moment, Jay Clarke lost 3 sets while Taro Daniel hasn’t lost a set so far. Daniel has played 3 sets less than Clarke (6 vs 9). Therefore, Daniel played 23 games less than Clarke. Daniel scored 97 winners (43% on total points). On the other side, Jay blasted 100 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Daniel | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 4.7 | 4 |
| 1st in | 139/214 | 130/241 |
| %1st in | 65% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 97/139 | 100/130 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 37/75 | 67/111 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 60% |
Daniel blasted 14 aces (4.7 per match). Clarke blasted 12 aces (4 per match). Daniel won 70% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Clarke won 77% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Daniel | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 12 |
| Converted | 13/24 | 12/33 |
| % Converted | 54% | 36% |
| Conceded | 20 | 15 |
| Saved | 12 | 8 |
| % Saved | 60% | 53% |
| Times Broken | 8 | 7 |
Daniel broke his opponents 13 times with 54% conversion rate. Taro conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Clarke broke his opponents 12 times with 36% conversion rate. Clarke conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 53% of the break points that he conceded.
| Daniel | |||||
| R2 Shimizu |
R3 Wu |
1/4 Safwat |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-65 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 20 | 17 | 63 | |
| pts | 90-83 | 65-56 | 73-52 | 228-191 | |
| Total points | 173 | 121 | 125 | 419 | |
| Winners | 40 | 24 | 33 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% | 45% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 5 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 59/87 | 38/66 | 42/61 | 139/214 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 58% | 69% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 40/59 | 24/38 | 33/42 | 97/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 63% | 79% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 12/28 | 11/19 | 37/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 43% | 58% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/11 | 3/7 | 13/24 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 55% | 43% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 7 | 4 | 20 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 3/7 | 4/4 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 43% | 100% | 66% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | 0 | 167 | |
| Clarke | |||||
| R2 Klein |
R3 Altmaier |
1/4 Bolt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-75 6-4 | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 30 | 30 | 86 | |
| pts | 94-86 | 95-78 | 99-77 | 288-241 | |
| Total points | 180 | 173 | 176 | 529 | |
| Winners | 28 | 39 | 33 | 100 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 41% | 33% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 1 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/74 | 52/82 | 43/85 | 130/241 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 63% | 51% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 39/52 | 33/43 | 100/130 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 75% | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/39 | 17/30 | 28/42 | 67/111 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 57% | 67% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/15 | 5/9 | 4/9 | 12/33 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 56% | 44% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 | 8 | 15 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 0/2 | 6/8 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 0% | 75% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 2 | 133 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWW
LLWLWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Burnie Challenger
- Taro DanielDaniel – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Alex BoltBolt (4-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Zhe LiLi (7-66 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Alex BoltBolt (4-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – See H2H details
- Taro DanielDaniel – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – See H2H details
