Lukas Lacko and Mischa Zverev will face off in the quarter of the the Quimper Challenger for the 4th time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 8:00 pm on COURT CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mischa Zverev who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mischa Zverev is the pick to win this match.
Mischa Zverev -> 1.72
Lukas Lacko -> 2.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lukas Lacko vs. Mischa Zverev
This will be the 4th time that Lukas Lacko and Mischa Zverev fight against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Zverev (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Zverev won 6-4 6-4 in the final in Eastbourne back in 2018.
Lukas Lacko
Ranked no. 178, Lacko reached the final after defeating Andrea Arnaboldi 7-611 4-6 6-3 and Roberto Ortega-Olmedo 6-2 6-2.
In the 3rd round, The Slovakian had a good straight sets win against Ortega-Olmedo (6-2 6-2). During the match Lacko scored 60 points vs Ortega-Olmedo’s 43. Lukas was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Lacko blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Lukas Lacko lost the serve once. Furthermore, Lacko put 65% of his first serves in, winning 82% (23/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (6/15) on the 2nd serve. Lacko broke Ortega-Olmedo 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Slovakian has lost 1 set in this event to win 53% of the points he played.
Lacko has a positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (348-285). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lacko has a 285-232 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
The Slovakian has a 2-2 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
The Slovakian didn’t compete in the Quimper Challenger in 2019.
Mischa Zverev
Ranked no. 281, Mischa got to the final after defeating Raul Brancaccio 6-1 4-6 6-3, Hiroki Moriya 6-2 7-65 and Quentin Halys 6-4 6-0.
In the 3rd round, Zverev had a good straight sets win against Halys (6-4 6-0). During the match Zverev scored 56 points vs Halys’s 34. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Zverev blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Mischa Zverev was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (27/33) of his 1st serve and 60% (6/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mischa broke Halys 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mischa has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Zverev has a winning record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (287-219). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zverev has a 248-244 win-loss record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
The German has a 4-1 win-loss record in 2020, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
Mischa didn’t compete in the Quimper Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lacko | Zverev |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
Tot Games | 48 | 63 |
Pts | 170-151 | 217-171 |
Total Points | 321 | 388 |
Winners | 79 | 112 |
%Winners | 46% | 52% |
Lacko played 2 matches while Zverev competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Lukas Lacko conceded 1 set, while Mischa Zverev dropper 1 set. Lacko has played 2 sets less than Zverev (5 vs 7). Therefore, Lacko played 15 games less than Zverev. The Slovakian scored 79 winners (46% on total points). On the other side, The German blasted 112 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lacko | Zverev |
---|---|---|
Aces | 23 | 14 |
Avg per match | 11.5 | 4.7 |
1st in | 102/158 | 146/196 |
%1st in | 65% | 74% |
1st pts | 79/102 | 112/146 |
%1st pts | 77% | 77% |
2nd pts | 27/56 | 23/50 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 46% |
Lacko blasted 23 aces (11.5 per match). Zverev blasted 14 aces (4.7 per match). Lacko won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Zverev won 77% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lacko | Zverev |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 11 |
Converted | 6/15 | 11/17 |
% Converted | 40% | 65% |
Conceded | 4 | 16 |
Saved | 2 | 14 |
% Saved | 50% | 88% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Slovakian broke his opponents 6 times with 40% conversion rate. Lacko conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Mischa broke his opponents 11 times with 65% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
Lacko | ||||
R2 Arnaboldi |
R3 Ortega-Olmedo |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-611 4-6 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 16 | 48 | |
pts | 110-108 | 60-43 | 170-151 | |
Total points | 218 | 103 | 321 | |
Winners | 56 | 23 | 79 | |
%Winners | 51% | 38% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 17 | 6 | 23 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
1st in | 74/115 | 28/43 | 102/158 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 56/74 | 23/28 | 79/102 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 82% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 21/41 | 6/15 | 27/56 | |
% 2nd pts | 51% | 40% | 48% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
Converted | 1/4 | 5/11 | 6/15 | |
Converted % | 25% | 45% | 40% | |
Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 0/1 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 0% | 34% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Zverev | |||||
R1 Brancaccio |
R2 Moriya |
R3 Halys |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | 6-2 7-65 | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 21 | 16 | 63 | |
pts | 93-78 | 68-59 | 56-34 | 217-171 | |
Total points | 171 | 127 | 90 | 388 | |
Winners | 47 | 38 | 27 | 112 | |
%Winners | 51% | 56% | 48% | 52% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 7 | 2 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
1st in | 61/87 | 52/66 | 33/43 | 146/196 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 79% | 77% | 74% | |
1st pts | 47/61 | 38/52 | 27/33 | 112/146 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 73% | 82% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 8/26 | 9/14 | 6/10 | 23/50 | |
% 2nd pts | 31% | 64% | 60% | 46% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 2 | 4 | 11 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 2/2 | 4/5 | 11/17 | |
Converted % | 50% | 100% | 80% | 65% | |
Conceded | 11 | 4 | 1 | 16 | |
Saved | 9/11 | 4/4 | 1/1 | 14 | |
Saved % | 82% | 100% | 100% | 141% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 0 | -33 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Guillermo Garcia-LopezGarcia-Lopez (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Daniel MasurMasur (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Alexey VatutinVatutin (7-62 7-64) – See score progression
- Mischa ZverevZverev – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Matthias BachingerBachinger – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Constant LestienneLestienne (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Mischa ZverevZverev – Lukas LackoLacko (5-2) – See H2H details
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Matthias BachingerBachinger (1-0) – See H2H details
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Maxime JanvierJanvier (1-0) – See H2H details
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – See H2H details