Constant Lestienne and Cem Ilkel will clash against each other in the 3rd round of the the Quimper Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 8:00 pm on COURT CENTRAL. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Constant Lestienne who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Constant Lestienne is the pick to win this match.
Constant Lestienne -> 1.57
Cem Ilkel -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Constant Lestienne vs. Cem Ilkel
There is no head to head record between Constant Lestienne and Cem Ilkel since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Constant Lestienne
Ranked no. 225, Constant reached the 3rd round after beating Altug Celikbilek 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Constant had a good straight sets win against Celikbilek (6-4 6-4). During the match Lestienne scored 69 points vs Celikbilek’s 58. Lestienne was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Lestienne blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Constant Lestienne lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Lestienne put 53% of his first serves in, winning 84% (26/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The French Player broke Celikbilek 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Lestienne has a weak record in the last 9 years having won 37% of his matches (363-210). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lestienne has a 129-105 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
The French Player has a 5-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
The French Player capitulated in the 3rd round 3-6 7-62 7-64 to Daniel Evans.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 266, Cem got to the 3rd round after defeating Viktor Durasovic 4-6 6-4 6-4 and Danilo Petrovic 7-66 3-1 ret..
In the 2nd round, The Turk had a good straight sets win against Petrovic (7-66 3-1 ret.). During the match Ilkel scored 59 points vs Petrovic’s 52. Ilkel was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilkel blasted 7 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Cem Ilkel lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Ilkel put 65% of his first serves in, winning 58% (21/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 79% (15/19) on the 2nd serve. Ilkel broke Petrovic twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Ilkel has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 51% of his matches (53-50). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ilkel has a 61-78 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Cem has a 5-3 win-loss record in 2020, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
The Turk didn’t play in the Quimper Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lestienne | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 30 |
| Pts | 69-58 | 101-96 |
| Total Points | 127 | 197 |
| Winners | 26 | 55 |
| %Winners | 38% | 54% |
Both Lestienne and Ilkel played 1 matche. At the moment, Cem Ilkel lost 1 set while Constant Lestienne hasn’t lost a set so far. Lestienne has played 1 sets less than Ilkel (2 vs 3). Therefore, Lestienne played 10 games less than Ilkel. Constant scored 26 winners (38% on total points). On the other side, Ilkel blasted 55 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lestienne | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 13 |
| 1st in | 31/58 | 72/100 |
| %1st in | 53% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 55/72 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/28 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 46% |
Lestienne blasted 6 aces . Ilkel blasted 13 aces . Lestienne won 84% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lestienne | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 2/8 |
| % Converted | 50% | 25% |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 |
| Saved | 1 | 6 |
| % Saved | 50% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Constant broke his opponent 3 times with 50% conversion rate. Lestienne conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Turk broke his opponent twice with 25% conversion rate. Cem conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lestienne | |||
| R2 Celikbilek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 69-58 | 69-58 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/58 | 31/58 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 26/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | |
| Ilkel | ||||
| R1 Durasovic |
R2 Petrovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 7-66 3-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 17 | 47 | |
| pts | 101-96 | 59-52 | 160-148 | |
| Total points | 197 | 111 | 308 | |
| Winners | 55 | 21 | 76 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 36% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 13 | 7 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 72/100 | 36/55 | 108/155 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 65% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 55/72 | 21/36 | 76/108 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 58% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 15/19 | 28/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 79% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/4 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 50% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 2/3 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 67% | 153% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWWL
LLWLLWLLWW Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Matthias BachingerBachinger – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueMathias – Enzo CouacaudEnzo (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaVit – Alexey VatutinAlexey (7-6(2) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Mischa ZverevZverev – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – See H2H details
- Guillermo Garcia-LopezGarcia-Lopez – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – See H2H details
- Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo – Lukas LackoLacko (0-0) – See H2H details
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Vit KoprivaKopriva (1-0) – See H2H details
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – See H2H details
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – See H2H details
- Daniel MasurMasur – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-1) – See H2H details
