Taro Daniel and Mohamed Safwat will fight against each other in the quarter of the the Burnie Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mohamed Safwat who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mohamed Safwat is the pick to win this match.
Mohamed Safwat -> 1.66
Taro Daniel -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Taro Daniel vs. Mohamed Safwat
This will be the 3rd time that Taro Daniel and Mohamed Safwat clash against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Daniel (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Safwat won 7-61 6-2 in the qualifications in Doha back in 2016.
Taro Daniel
Ranked no. 110, Daniel reached the qualifications after beating Yuta Shimizu 7-64 7-65 and Tung-Lin Wu 6-4 6-4.
In the 3rd round, Taro had a good straight sets win against Wu (6-4 6-4). During the match Daniel scored 65 points vs Wu’s 56. Taro was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Daniel blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Taro Daniel lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Daniel put 58% of his first serves in, winning 63% (24/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (12/28) on the 2nd serve. Taro broke Wu 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Japanese hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Daniel has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (507-439). 3-2 on hard in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Daniel has a 252-193 record in the last 10 years on hard.
The Japanese has a 3-2 win-loss record in 2020, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Burnie Challenger
The Japanese didn’t compete in the Burnie Challenger in 2019.
Mohamed Safwat
Ranked no. 173, Mohamed reached the qualifications after defeating Borna Gojo 3-6 7-5 6-3 and Kimmer Coppejans 3-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 3rd round against Coppejans, Safwat recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-4).-89) than Coppejans. In fact, the world no. 110 won 89 points vs Coppejans’s. That means that Safwat was more focused during the important points. The Egyptian was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Safwat blasted 6 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Mohamed Safwat lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Safwat put 54% of his first serves in, winning 69% (38/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (22/47) on the 2nd serve. Mohamed broke Coppejans 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Safwat has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Safwat has a negative win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 47% of his matches (271-305). 5-2 on hard in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Safwat has a 96-138 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Safwat has a 5-2 win-loss record in 2020, 5-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Burnie Challenger
The Egyptian capitulated in the 3rd round 6-1 6-3 to Steven Diez.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Daniel | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 46 | 58 |
| Pts | 155-139 | 182-171 |
| Total Points | 294 | 353 |
| Winners | 64 | 72 |
| %Winners | 41% | 40% |
Both Daniel and Safwat played 2 matches. At the moment, Mohamed Safwat conceded 2 sets while Taro Daniel hasn’t lost a set so far. Daniel has played 2 sets less than Safwat (4 vs 6). Therefore, Daniel played 12 games less than Safwat. Daniel scored 64 winners (41% on total points). On the other side, Safwat blasted 72 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Daniel | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 4.5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 97/153 | 100/185 |
| %1st in | 63% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 64/97 | 72/100 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 26/56 | 44/85 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 52% |
Daniel blasted 9 aces (4.5 per match). Safwat blasted 8 aces (4 per match). Daniel won 66% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Safwat won 72% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Daniel | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 8 |
| Converted | 10/17 | 8/17 |
| % Converted | 59% | 47% |
| Conceded | 16 | 19 |
| Saved | 8 | 13 |
| % Saved | 50% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 8 | 6 |
The Japanese broke his opponents 10 times with 59% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Egyptian broke his opponents 8 times with 47% conversion rate. Safwat conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
| Daniel | ||||
| R2 Shimizu |
R3 Wu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-65 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 20 | 46 | |
| pts | 90-83 | 65-56 | 155-139 | |
| Total points | 173 | 121 | 294 | |
| Winners | 40 | 24 | 64 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 59/87 | 38/66 | 97/153 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 58% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 40/59 | 24/38 | 64/97 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 63% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 12/28 | 26/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 43% | 46% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/11 | 10/17 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 55% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 7 | 16 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 3/7 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 43% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | 300 | |
| Safwat | ||||
| R2 Gojo |
R3 Coppejans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 28 | 58 | |
| pts | 93-81 | 89-90 | 182-171 | |
| Total points | 174 | 179 | 353 | |
| Winners | 34 | 38 | 72 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 43% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 7 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 45/83 | 55/102 | 100/185 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 38/55 | 72/100 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 69% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/38 | 22/47 | 44/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 47% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/8 | 8/17 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 50% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 11 | 19 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 8/11 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 73% | 68% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 200 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWW
LWWWLWWWWW Tennis Scores in Burnie Challenger
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Blaz KavcicKavcic (6-77 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Yannick MadenMaden (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Zhe LiLi – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Duckhee LeeLee (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-1 6-75 6-4) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Duckhee LeeLee (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Zhe LiLi – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-1) – See H2H details
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – See H2H details
- Alex BoltBolt – Jay ClarkeClarke (1-0) – See H2H details
- Taro DanielDaniel – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (2-2) – See H2H details
