Nicole Gibbs and Coco Vandeweghe will clash against each other in the 3rd round of the the Oracle Challenger Series for the 1st time in their career. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Coco Vandeweghe who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Coco Vandeweghe is the pick to win this match.
Coco Vandeweghe -> 1.57
Nicole Gibbs -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nicole Gibbs vs. Coco Vandeweghe
There is no head to head record between Nicole Gibbs and Coco Vandeweghe since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
The last time that they squared off, Vandeweghe won 6-0 6-2 in the 2nd round in the 1100035221 back in 2017.
Nicole Gibbs
Ranked no. 124, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Hailey Baptiste 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Baptiste (6-4 6-4). During the match Gibbs scored 69 points vs Baptiste’s 63. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Gibbs scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 4 double faults. Nicole Gibbs lost the serve twice and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Gibbs put 59% of her first serves in, winning 63% (26/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. Nicole broke Baptiste 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
Gibbs has a positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 52% of her matches (557-515). 4-2 on hard in 2020. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Gibbs has a 115-116 record in the last 10 years on hard.
Gibbs has a 4-2 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Newport Beach
Nicole didn’t play in the Newport Beach in 2019.
Coco Vandeweghe
Ranked no. 226, the American reached the 2nd round after beating Maria Camila Osorio Serrano 6-4 6-1 and Allie Kiick 6-2 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Coco had a good straight sets win against Kiick (6-2 6-1). During the match Vandeweghe scored 56 points vs Kiick’s 35. Coco was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Vandeweghe blasted 3 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Coco Vandeweghe lost the serve twice and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Vandeweghe put 61% of her first serves in, winning 68% (19/28) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (8/18) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kiick 7 times after converting 58% of her break points (7/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 58% of the points she played.
Vandeweghe has a negative win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 47% of her matches (420-466). 3-3 on hard in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Vandeweghe has a 165-151 record in the last 10 years on hard.
Coco has a 3-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Newport Beach
Vandeweghe didn’t compete in the Newport Beach in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gibbs | Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 32 |
| Pts | 69-63 | 125-90 |
| Total Points | 132 | 215 |
| Winners | 26 | 43 |
| %Winners | 38% | 34% |
Gibbs played 1 match while Vandeweghe competed in 2 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Gibbs has played 2 sets less than Vandeweghe (2 vs 4). Therefore, Gibbs played 12 games less than Vandeweghe. The American scored 26 winners (38% on total points). On the other side, The American blasted 43 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gibbs | Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 41/69 | 60/103 |
| %1st in | 59% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 26/41 | 43/60 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 20/43 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 47% |
Gibbs blasted 1 ace . Vandeweghe also blasted 6 aces (3 per match). Gibbs won 63% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Vandeweghe won 72% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gibbs | Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 12/23 |
| % Converted | 50% | 52% |
| Conceded | 7 | 11 |
| Saved | 5 | 8 |
| % Saved | 71% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The American broke her opponent 4 times with 50% conversion rate. Gibbs conceded her serve twice and she saved 71% of the break points that she conceded. Vandeweghe broke her opponents 12 times with 52% conversion rate. Vandeweghe conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 73% of the break points that she conceded.
| Gibbs | |||
| R2 Baptiste |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 69-63 | 69-63 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/69 | 41/69 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 26/41 | 26/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 100 | |
| Vandeweghe | ||||
| R1 Camila Osorio Serrano |
R2 Kiick |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 32 | |
| pts | 69-55 | 56-35 | 125-90 | |
| Total points | 124 | 91 | 215 | |
| Winners | 24 | 19 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 32/57 | 28/46 | 60/103 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 61% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 19/28 | 43/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 68% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 8/18 | 20/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 44% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 7/12 | 12/23 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 58% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 3/5 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 60% | 143% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 50 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Newport Beach
- Stefanie VoegeleVoegele – Hanna ChangChang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Jessika PonchetPonchet (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Sara ErraniErrani (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Claire LiuLiu (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicole GibbsGibbs – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Christina MchaleMchale – Grace MinMin (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Coco VandewegheVandeweghe – Allie KiickKiick (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Amandine HesseHesse (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sophia WhittleWhittle – Robin AndersonAnderson (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Shelby RogersRogers – Alexa GlatchGlatch (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Claire LiuLiu (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Veronica Cepede RoygCepede Royg – Quinn GleasonGleason (7-5 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefanie VoegeleVoegele – Hanna ChangChang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Madison BrengleBrengle (2-1) – See H2H details
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Shelby RogersRogers (2-1) – See H2H details
- Veronica Cepede RoygCepede Royg – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (2-0) – See H2H details
- Stefanie VoegeleVoegele – Irina FalconiFalconi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sophia WhittleWhittle – Christina MchaleMchale (0-0) – See H2H details
- Nicole GibbsGibbs – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (0-2) – See H2H details
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Taylor TownsendTownsend (1-0) – See H2H details
