Kimmer Coppejans and Mohamed Safwat will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the the Burnie Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mohamed Safwat who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mohamed Safwat is the pick to win this match.
Mohamed Safwat -> 1.83
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kimmer Coppejans vs. Mohamed Safwat
This will be the 2nd time that Kimmer Coppejans and Mohamed Safwat play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Coppejans (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they played, Coppejans won 6-2 6-75 7-5 in the quarter in the Meknes Challenger back in 2014.
Kimmer Coppejans
Ranked no. 158, Kimmer reached the quarter after beating Harry Bourchier 5-7 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Bourchier, Coppejans recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-3 6-4). During the match Coppejans scored 110 points vs Bourchier’s 106. Coppejans was extremely aggressive to blast 56 winners.
Talking about serving, Coppejans blasted 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 71% of his first serves in, winning 71% (56/79) of the points behind his 1st serve and 24% (8/33) on the 2nd serve. The Belgian broke Bourchier 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Coppejans has a positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (276-258). 3-2 on hard in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Coppejans has a 203-155 record in the last 10 years on hard.
Kimmer has a 3-2 win-loss record in 2020, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Burnie Challenger
Coppejans didn’t play in the Burnie Challenger in 2019.
Mohamed Safwat
Ranked no. 173, Safwat got to the quarter after defeating Borna Gojo 3-6 7-5 6-3.
In the 2nd round against Gojo, Safwat recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-3). During the match Safwat scored 93 points vs Gojo’s 81. Mohamed was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Safwat blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Mohamed Safwat was extremely effective on serve to win 76% (34/45) of his 1st serve and 58% (22/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Mohamed broke Gojo 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Safwat has a negative record in the last 9 years having won 46% of his matches (262-305). 4-2 on hard in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Safwat has a 95-138 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Mohamed has a 4-2 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Burnie Challenger
Safwat lost in the 3rd round 6-1 6-3 to Steven Diez.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Coppejans | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 30 |
| Pts | 110-106 | 93-81 |
| Total Points | 216 | 174 |
| Winners | 56 | 34 |
| %Winners | 51% | 37% |
Both Coppejans and Safwat played 1 matche. Both players lost a set in the event. Kimmer Coppejans conceded 1 set, while Mohamed Safwat dropper 1 set. Talking about their workload, Coppejans and Safwat have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Coppejans played 1 games more than Safwat. Kimmer scored 56 winners (51% on total points). On the other side, The Egyptian blasted 34 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Coppejans | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 79/112 | 45/83 |
| %1st in | 71% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 56/79 | 34/45 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 8/33 | 22/38 |
| %2nd pts | 24% | 58% |
Coppejans blasted 2 aces . Safwat blasted 2 aces . Coppejans won 71% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 24% of the points. On the other side, Safwat won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Coppejans | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 46% | 44% |
| Conceded | 11 | 8 |
| Saved | 7 | 5 |
| % Saved | 64% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Coppejans broke his opponent 6 times with 46% conversion rate. Kimmer conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. Safwat broke his opponent 4 times with 44% conversion rate. The Egyptian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Coppejans | |||
| R2 Bourchier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 110-106 | 110-106 | |
| Total points | 216 | 216 | |
| Winners | 56 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 79/112 | 79/112 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 56/79 | 56/79 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/33 | 8/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 24% | 24% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 300 | |
| Safwat | |||
| R2 Gojo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 93-81 | 93-81 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 45/83 | 45/83 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 34/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/38 | 22/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 200 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLW
WWWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Burnie Challenger
- Alex BoltBolt – Liam CaruanaCaruana (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Duckhee LeeLee – Evan KingKing (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Brydan KleinKlein (1-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Liam BroadyBroady (6-0 3-6 7-61) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Borna GojoGojo (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Andrew HarrisHarris (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Harry BourchierBourchier (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Julian LenzLenz (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Steven DiezDiez (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Zhe LiLi – Jacob GrillsGrills (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Evan SongSong (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Harry BourchierBourchier (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Liam CaruanaCaruana (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Duckhee LeeLee – Evan KingKing (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Benjamin LockLock (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-1) – See H2H details
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Zhe LiLi (0-1) – See H2H details
- Alex BoltBolt – Duckhee LeeLee (0-0) – See H2H details
- Taro DanielDaniel – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – See H2H details
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – See H2H details
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – See H2H details
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Yannick MadenMaden (0-0) – See H2H details
