Taro Daniel and Tung-Lin Wu will face off in the 3rd round of the the Burnie Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 2:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tung-Lin Wu is the pick to win this match.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.53
Taro Daniel -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Taro Daniel vs. Tung-Lin Wu
There is no head to head record between Taro Daniel and Tung-Lin Wu since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Taro Daniel
Ranked no. 110, the Japanese reached the 3rd round after beating Yuta Shimizu 7-64 7-65.
In the 2nd round, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Shimizu (7-64 7-65). During the match Daniel scored 90 points vs Shimizu’s 83. Daniel was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Daniel blasted 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Taro Daniel lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Daniel put 68% of his first serves in, winning 68% (40/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Shimizu 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Daniel has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (497-439). 2-2 on hard in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Daniel has a 251-193 record in the last 10 years on hard.
The Japanese has a 2-2 win-loss record in 2020, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Burnie Challenger
Daniel didn’t compete in the Burnie Challenger in 2019.
Tung-Lin Wu
Ranked no. 232, Tung-Lin reached the 3rd round after defeating Evan Song 6-0 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Tung-Lin had a good straight sets win against Song (6-0 6-3). During the match Wu scored 61 points vs Song’s 36. Wu was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Wu blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Tung-Lin Wu lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Wu put 64% of his first serves in, winning 72% (26/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Song 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Wu has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 55% of his matches (69-56). 1-2 on hard in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wu has a 39-32 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Tung-Lin has a 1-2 win-loss record in 2020, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Burnie Challenger
Tung-Lin didn’t play in the Burnie Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Daniel | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 15 |
| Pts | 90-83 | 61-36 |
| Total Points | 173 | 97 |
| Winners | 40 | 26 |
| %Winners | 44% | 43% |
Both Daniel and Wu played 1 matche. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Daniel and Wu have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Daniel played 11 games more than Wu. The Japanese scored 40 winners (44% on total points). On the other side, The Chinese blasted 26 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Daniel | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 59/87 | 36/56 |
| %1st in | 68% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 40/59 | 26/36 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 10/20 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 50% |
Daniel blasted 3 aces . Wu blasted 3 aces . Daniel won 68% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Wu won 72% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Daniel | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 67% | 71% |
| Conceded | 9 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 56% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
Taro broke his opponent 4 times with 67% conversion rate. Taro conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. The Chinese broke his opponent 5 times with 71% conversion rate. Tung-Lin conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Daniel | |||
| R2 Shimizu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 90-83 | 90-83 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 59/87 | 59/87 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 40/59 | 40/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 300 | |
| Wu | |||
| R2 Song |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 61-36 | 61-36 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 36/56 | 36/56 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLWLL
LLWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Burnie Challenger
- Alex BoltBolt – Liam CaruanaCaruana (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Duckhee LeeLee – Evan KingKing (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Brydan KleinKlein (1-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Liam BroadyBroady (6-0 3-6 7-61) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Borna GojoGojo (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Andrew HarrisHarris (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Harry BourchierBourchier (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Julian LenzLenz (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Steven DiezDiez (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Zhe LiLi – Jacob GrillsGrills (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Evan SongSong (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Harry BourchierBourchier (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Liam CaruanaCaruana (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Duckhee LeeLee – Evan KingKing (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Benjamin LockLock (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-1) – See H2H details
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Zhe LiLi (0-1) – See H2H details
- Alex BoltBolt – Duckhee LeeLee (0-0) – See H2H details
- Taro DanielDaniel – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – See H2H details
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – See H2H details
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – See H2H details
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Yannick MadenMaden (0-0) – See H2H details
