Cem Ilkel and Antoine Escoffier will square off in the 3rd round of the the Rennes Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on SAINT-GREGOIRE. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Antoine Escoffier who should win in 3 sets.
Antoine Escoffier -> 1.80
Cem Ilkel -> 1.90
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Cem Ilkel vs. Antoine Escoffier
There is no head to head record between Cem Ilkel and Antoine Escoffier since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.However, they played each other in futures. Therefore their H2H is 1-0 for Ilkel.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 266, the Turk got to the 3rd round after defeating Alessandro Bega 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Cem had a good straight sets win against Bega (6-4 6-2). During the match Ilkel scored 72 points vs Bega’s 51. Cem was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilkel blasted 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Cem Ilkel was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (23/29) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Turk broke Bega 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Ilkel has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (32-43). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ilkel has a 58-77 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The Turk has a 2-2 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Rennes Challenger
Ilkel didn’t compete in the Rennes Challenger in 2019.
Antoine Escoffier
Ranked no. 371, Antoine reached the 3rd round after defeating Manuel Guinard 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The French Player had a good straight sets win against Guinard (6-4 6-3). During the match Escoffier scored 85 points vs Guinard’s 70. Antoine was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Escoffier blasted 7 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Antoine Escoffier lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Escoffier put 70% of his first serves in, winning 72% (31/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (7/18) on the 2nd serve. Escoffier broke Guinard 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Escoffier has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (61-39). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Escoffier has a 48-36 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The French Player’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
Escoffier has a 6-0 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Rennes Challenger
Antoine didn’t compete in the Rennes Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ilkel | Escoffier |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 19 |
| Pts | 72-51 | 85-70 |
| Total Points | 123 | 155 |
| Winners | 23 | 31 |
| %Winners | 32% | 36% |
Both Ilkel and Escoffier played 1 matche. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ilkel and Escoffier have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Ilkel played 1 games less than Escoffier. Ilkel scored 23 winners (32% on total points). On the other side, Escoffier blasted 31 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ilkel | Escoffier |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 7 |
| 1st in | 29/52 | 43/61 |
| %1st in | 56% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 31/43 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 7/18 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 39% |
Ilkel blasted 10 aces . Escoffier blasted 7 aces . Ilkel won 79% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Escoffier won 72% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ilkel | Escoffier |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 67% | 42% |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Ilkel broke his opponent 4 times with 67% conversion rate. The Turk conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The French Player broke his opponent 5 times with 42% conversion rate. Escoffier conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ilkel | |||
| R2 Bega | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 72-51 | 72-51 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 29/52 | 29/52 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 23/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Escoffier | |||
| R1 Guinard | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 85-70 | 85-70 | |
| Total points | 155 | 155 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 43/61 | 43/61 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 31/43 | 31/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 7/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Rennes Challenger
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Oscar OtteOtte (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Danilo PetrovicPetrovic – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Jerzy JanowiczJanowicz (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- James WardWard – Pavel KotovKotov (6-3 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (7-66 6-0) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Maxime JanvierJanvier (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Alessandro BegaBega (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Karim-Mohamed MaamounMaamoun (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Patrik Niklas-SalminenNiklas-Salminen (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-3 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-3 3-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo – Dan AddedAdded (7-60 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-2 0-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Maxime JanvierJanvier (7-6(6) 6-2) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Lukas LackoLacko (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Danilo PetrovicPetrovic (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-1) – See H2H details
- James WardWard – Corentin DenollyDenolly (0-0) – See H2H details
- Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – See H2H details
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – See H2H details
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-0) – See H2H details
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (0-0) – See H2H details