
Dino Prizmic and Borna Gojo will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Brest Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on Center Court. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dino Prizmic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dino Prizmic is the pick to win this match.
Dino Prizmic -> 1.55
Borna Gojo -> 2.26
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dino Prizmic vs. Borna Gojo
There is no head to head record between Dino Prizmic and Borna Gojo since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Dino Prizmic

35 - 19win/loss
93
70
WLLWWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 35-19 | 9-7 | 21-8 | 4-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 40-17 | 8-4 | 23-6 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 20-18 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-19 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-9 | 21-1 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 93, the Croatian got to the 2nd round after beating Robin Catry 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Croatian had a good straight sets win against Catry (6-4 6-3). During the match, Prizmic scored 70 points vs Catry’s 58. The Croatian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Prizmic managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Dino Prizmic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Prizmic put 67% of his first serves in, winning 67% (29/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. Dino broke Catry 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Prizmic has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 65% of his matches (162-86). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2026. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Prizmic has a compiled35-26 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Croatian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Monza Challenger.
The Croatian has a compiled 35-19 win-loss record in 2026, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
Prizmic has never competed in this tournament before.
Borna Gojo

36 - 15win/loss
135
72
WLWWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 36-15 | 20-8 | 2-2 | 13-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 19-18 | 4-6 | 12-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 10-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 135, Gojo reached the 2nd round after beating Tom Paris 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Paris, Gojo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-4 6-4). During the match Gojo scored 109 points vs Paris’s 90. Borna was exceptionally aggressive to blast 55 winners.
Talking about serving, Gojo submerged his opponent with 26 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Borna Gojo was exceptionally effective on serve to win 92% (55/60) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Croatian broke Paris twice after converting 18% of his break points (2/11).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Metepec Challenger where he overcame Alexis Galarneau in the final 6-1 6-4 and the Morelia Challenger where he defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich in the final 7-6(5) 6-2.
Gojo has a compiled 36-15 win-loss record in 2026, 13-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Prizmic | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 33 |
| Pts | 70-58 | 109-90 |
| Total Points | 128 | 199 |
| Winners | 29 | 55 |
| %Winners | 41% | 50% |
Both Prizmic and Gojo played 1 match. At the moment, Borna Gojo surrendered 1 set while Dino Prizmic hasn’t dropped a set so far. Prizmic has played 1 set(s) less than Gojo (2 vs 3). Therefore, Prizmic played 14 games less than Gojo. The Croatian scored 29 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Borna made 55 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Prizmic | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 26 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 26 |
| 1st in | 43/64 | 60/86 |
| %1st in | 67% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 29/43 | 55/60 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 92% |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 15/26 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 58% |
Prizmic struck 3 aces . Gojo scored 26 aces . Prizmic won 67% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 92% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Prizmic | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/14 | 2/11 |
| % Converted | 36% | 18% |
| Conceded | 6 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The Croatian broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Croatian dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Borna broke his opponent twice with a 18% conversion rate. Gojo was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Prizmic | |||
| R1 Catry |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 70-58 | 70-58 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 43/64 | 43/64 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 29/43 | 29/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Gojo | |||
| R1 Paris |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 109-90 | 109-90 | |
| Total points | 199 | 199 | |
| Winners | 55 | 55 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 26 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 60/86 | 60/86 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 55/60 | 55/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/11 | 2/11 | |
| Converted % | 18% | 18% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Brest Challenger
- Borna GojoGojo – Tom ParisParis (6-75 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Matisse BobichonBobichon – Michael GeertsGeerts (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Moez EcharguiEchargui (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Robin CatryCatry (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Matteo MartineauMartineau (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-0 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Moez EcharguiEchargui (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Matisse BobichonBobichon – Michael GeertsGeerts (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Tom ParisParis (6-7(5) 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Robin CatryCatry (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Laslo DjereDjere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Gabriel DialloDiallo (1-0) – H2H and prediction







