Bu Yunchaokete and Yunseong Chung will square off in the 2nd round of the Seoul Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on Centre Court. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bu Yunchaokete who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bu Yunchaokete is the pick to win this match.
Bu Yunchaokete -> 1.083
Yunseong Chung -> 6.1
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Bu Yunchaokete vs. Yunseong Chung
This will be the 2nd time that Bu Yunchaokete and Yunseong Chung square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Yunchaokete (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Yunchaokete won 6-1 6-4 in the 1st round in the Busan Challenger back in April 2026.
Bu Yunchaokete
35 - 20win/loss
92
64
WLWLWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 35-20 | 24-16 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 11-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 20-30 | 12-17 | 6-8 | 2-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 51-27 | 40-14 | 3-2 | 7-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-23 | 27-15 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 87-28 | 84-24 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
Ranked no. 92, Bu got to the 2nd round after beating Min Hyuk Cho 6-1 6-0.
In the 1st round, Bu had a good straight sets win against Hyuk Cho (6-1 6-0). During the match, Yunchaokete scored 58 points vs Hyuk Cho’s 27. Yunchaokete was quite aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about the service games, Yunchaokete couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Bu Yunchaokete was quite efficient on serve to win 89% (16/18) of his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Chinese broke Hyuk Cho 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Yunchaokete has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (231-132). 24-16 on hard in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Yunchaokete has an overall188-88 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Birmingham Challenger where he overcame Otto Virtanen in the final 2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 and the Ilkley Challenger where he overcame Jacob Fearnley in the final 6-3 7-6(1).
Yunchaokete has an overall 35-20 win-loss record in 2026, 24-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2023. See his history.
Yunseong Chung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 24-11 | 21-10 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 18-10 | 18-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 14-17 | 14-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-22 | 20-16 | 5-4 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 23-17 | 7-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 756, Chung got to the 2nd round after beating Alexander Donski 6-3 6-4, Yeonsu Jeong 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) and Shintaro Imai 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Chung had a good straight sets win against Imai (6-4 6-3). During the match Chung scored 70 points vs Imai’s 50. Yunseong was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Chung fired 6 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Yunseong Chung was exceptionally effective on serve to win 88% (29/33) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Korean broke Imai 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Yunseong’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Guiyang.
Yunseong has an aggregate 24-11 win-loss record in 2026, 21-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Yunchaokete | Chung |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 69 |
| Pts | 58-27 | 241-204 |
| Total Points | 85 | 445 |
| Winners | 16 | 95 |
| %Winners | 28% | 39% |
Yunchaokete played 1 match while Chung competed in 3 matches. Chung started his run from the qualifications while Yunchaokete had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Yunseong Chung lost 1 set while Bu Yunchaokete hasn’t conceded a set so far. Yunchaokete has played 5 set(s) less than Chung (2 vs 7). Therefore, Yunchaokete played 56 games less than Chung. Bu scored 16 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Chung fired 95 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Yunchaokete | Chung |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 8.3 |
| 1st in | 18/30 | 124/203 |
| %1st in | 60% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 16/18 | 95/124 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 39/79 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 49% |
Yunchaokete didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Chung made 25 aces (8.3 per match). Yunchaokete won 89% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Chung won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Yunchaokete | Chung |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 12 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 12/32 |
| % Converted | 40% | 38% |
| Conceded | 0 | 13 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 46% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 7 |
Bu broke his opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Chinese had a solid display on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Korean broke his opponents 12 times with a 38% conversion rate. Yunseong conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 46% of the break points that he conceded.
| Yunchaokete | |||
| R1 Hyuk |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 58-27 | 58-27 | |
| Total points | 85 | 85 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 18/30 | 18/30 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 16/18 | 16/18 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Chung | |||||
| Q1 Donski |
Q3 Jeong |
R1 Imai |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 3-6 6-3 7-63 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 31 | 19 | 69 | |
| pts | 64-53 | 107-101 | 70-50 | 241-204 | |
| Total points | 117 | 208 | 120 | 445 | |
| Winners | 17 | 49 | 29 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 46% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 14 | 6 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 23/56 | 68/95 | 33/52 | 124/203 | |
| % 1st in | 41% | 72% | 63% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 17/23 | 49/68 | 29/33 | 95/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 72% | 88% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/33 | 11/27 | 10/19 | 39/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 41% | 53% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 4/11 | 3/11 | 12/32 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 36% | 27% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 | 2 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 5/9 | 1/2 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 56% | 50% | 106% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Seoul Challenger
- Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Andre IlaganIlagan (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-4 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Koki MatsudaMatsuda (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Sanhui ShinShin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Jan KumstatKumstat (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Shintaro ImaiImai (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Seongchan HongHong – Yibing WuWu (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Marin CilicCilic (7-63 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Min Hyuk ChoHyuk Cho (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Rei SakamotoSakamoto – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Jangjun KimKim (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Juncheng ShangShang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Koki MatsudaMatsuda (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Andre IlaganIlagan (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Seongchan HongHong – Yibing WuWu (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Jan KumstatKumstat (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Sanhui ShinShin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-4 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Shintaro ImaiImai (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Aleksandar VukicVukic (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Taro DanielDaniel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
