
Lloyd Harris and Omar Jasika will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Seoul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on Centre Court. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lloyd Harris who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lloyd Harris is the pick to win this match.
Lloyd Harris -> 1.097
Omar Jasika -> 5.7
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Lloyd Harris vs. Omar Jasika
There is no head to head record between Lloyd Harris and Omar Jasika since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Lloyd Harris

42 - 15win/loss
108
31
WLWWWWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 42-15 | 38-9 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 21-19 | 13-11 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-14 | 16-3 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 12-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-23 | 21-16 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-14 | 4-6 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 108, Lloyd got to the 2nd round after defeating Juncheng Shang 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Harris had a good straight sets win against Shang (6-4 6-3). During the match, Lloyd scored 65 points vs Shang’s 47. Harris was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lloyd struck 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Lloyd Harris lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lloyd put 67% of his first serves in, winning 79% (30/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. The South African broke Shang 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Lloyd has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (333-205). 38-9 on hard in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lloyd has a composed 227-104 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Soma Bay Challenger where he beat Jack Pinnington Jones in the final 6-1 5-2 ret. and the Tenerife 2 Challenger where he beat Alejandro Moro Canas in the final 7-5 7-5 and the Brownsburg Challenger where he defeated Andre Ilagan in the final 6-2 7-6(6) and the Jingshan Challenger where he beat Mattia Bellucci in the final 1-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Lloyd has an overall 42-15 win-loss record in 2026, 38-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2018. See his history.
Omar Jasika
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 49-31 | 49-31 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 31-32 | 24-27 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 55-27 | 52-15 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-26 | 34-20 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 70-23 | 63-20 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 386, the Australian got to the 2nd round after defeating Tae Woo Kim 6-3 6-4, Yuta Kikuchi 6-2 6-4 and Alexandre Muller 6-4 2-0 ret..
In the 1st round against Muller, Omar had a free pass after Muller retired on a 6-4 2-0 . scoreline.
Jasika’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Tokyo,M15 Brisbane and M15 Tianjin.
Jasika has a compiled 49-31 win-loss record in 2026, 49-31 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2017 and 2025. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lloyd | Jasika |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 49 |
| Pts | 65-47 | 170-127 |
| Total Points | 112 | 297 |
| Winners | 30 | 58 |
| %Winners | 46% | 34% |
Lloyd played 1 match while Jasika competed in 3 matches. Jasika started his run from the qualifications while Lloyd had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Lloyd has played 5 set(s) less than Jasika (2 vs 7). Therefore, Lloyd played 30 games less than Jasika. Lloyd scored 30 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Jasika made 58 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lloyd | Jasika |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 0.3 |
| 1st in | 38/57 | 83/149 |
| %1st in | 67% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 30/38 | 58/83 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 36/66 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 55% |
Lloyd fired 10 aces . Jasika fired 1 ace (0.3 per match). Lloyd won 79% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Jasika won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lloyd | Jasika |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 13 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 13/17 |
| % Converted | 57% | 76% |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 60% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The South African broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Lloyd dropped his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponents 13 times with a 76% conversion rate. Jasika conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lloyd | |||
| R1 Shang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 65-47 | 65-47 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/57 | 38/57 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 30/38 | 30/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Jasika | |||||
| Q1 Woo |
Q3 Kikuchi |
R1 Muller |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | 6-4 2-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 18 | 12 | 49 | |
| pts | 65-46 | 66-53 | 39-28 | 170-127 | |
| Total points | 111 | 119 | 67 | 297 | |
| Winners | 25 | 22 | 11 | 58 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 33% | 28% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 2 | 4 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 32/60 | 34/58 | 17/31 | 83/149 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 59% | 55% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 22/34 | 11/17 | 58/83 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 65% | 65% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 14/24 | 7/14 | 36/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 58% | 50% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 5/9 | 4/4 | 13/17 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 56% | 100% | 76% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 1/3 | 0/2 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 33% | 0% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Seoul Challenger
- Omar JasikaJasika – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-4 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Koki MatsudaMatsuda (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Sanhui ShinShin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Jan KumstatKumstat (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Shintaro ImaiImai (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Seongchan HongHong – Yibing WuWu (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Andre IlaganIlagan (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Marin CilicCilic (7-63 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Min Hyuk ChoHyuk Cho (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Rei SakamotoSakamoto – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Jangjun KimKim (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Juncheng ShangShang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Koki MatsudaMatsuda (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Andre IlaganIlagan (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Seongchan HongHong – Yibing WuWu (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Jan KumstatKumstat (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Sanhui ShinShin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-4 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Shintaro ImaiImai (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Aleksandar VukicVukic (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Taro DanielDaniel (0-0) – H2H and prediction







