Alan Magadan and Tristan Mccormick will play each other in the qualifications of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11:00 am on Court 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alan Magadan who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alan Magadan is the pick to win this match.
Alan Magadan -> 1.62
Tristan Mccormick -> 2.13
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Alan Magadan vs. Tristan Mccormick
There is no head to head record between Alan Magadan and Tristan Mccormick since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Alan Magadan
25 - 24win/loss
501
501
WLWLWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 25-24 | 16-13 | 8-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 19-21 | 8-16 | 2-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-12 | 21-10 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 501 (career-high), the Mexican reached the qualifications after defeating Mario Andre Galarraga 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Mexican had a good straight sets win against Andre Galarraga (6-3 6-4). During the match, Magadan scored 67 points vs Andre Galarraga’s 55. Magadan was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Magadan couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Alan Magadan lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Magadan put 66% of his first serves in, winning 66% (23/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the 2nd serve. Alan broke Andre Galarraga 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Magadan has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 51% of his matches (71-67). 8-8 on clay in 2026. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Magadan has a compiled11-11 record in the last 5 years on clay.
Alan has a composed 25-24 win-loss record in 2026, 8-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Magadan has never competed in this tournament before.
Tristan Mccormick
25 - 23win/loss
642
484
WLLWWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 25-23 | 6-6 | 16-13 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 37-37 | 13-16 | 18-17 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-32 | 9-11 | 17-17 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-20 | 4-7 | 14-8 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-11 | 13-5 | 7-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 642, Tristan reached the qualifications after beating Bernardo Munk Mesa 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Munk Mesa (7-5 6-3). During the match Mccormick scored 74 points vs Munk Mesa’s 65. Mccormick was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Mccormick bagged 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Tristan Mccormick lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Mccormick put 57% of his first serves in, winning 65% (28/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (20/33) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Munk Mesa 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
Mccormick’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Rochester and M15 Quito.
The American has an overall 25-23 win-loss record in 2026, 16-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2025. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Magadan | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 |
| Pts | 67-55 | 74-65 |
| Total Points | 122 | 139 |
| Winners | 23 | 28 |
| %Winners | 34% | 38% |
Both Magadan and Mccormick played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Magadan and Mccormick have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Magadan played 2 games less than Mccormick. Magadan scored 23 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Mccormick managed to score 28 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Magadan | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 35/53 | 43/76 |
| %1st in | 66% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 23/35 | 28/43 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 20/33 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 61% |
Magadan didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Mccormick blasted 3 aces . Magadan won 66% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Mccormick won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Magadan | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 3/13 |
| % Converted | 56% | 23% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 33% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Mexican broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Mexican conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Mccormick broke his opponent 3 times with a 23% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Magadan | |||
| Q1 Andre |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-55 | 67-55 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/53 | 35/53 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 23/35 | 23/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Mccormick | |||
| Q1 Munk |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 74-65 | 74-65 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 43/76 | 43/76 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 28/43 | 28/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/33 | 20/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/13 | 3/13 | |
| Converted % | 23% | 23% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Guayaquil Challenger
- Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez – Filip MisolicMisolic (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Miguel TobonTobon – Daniel Salazar MartinezSalazar Martinez (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lorenzo ClaverieLorenzo – Ryan NijboerRyan (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Lorenzo Joaquin RodriguezJoaquin Rodriguez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Hugo DellienDellien (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Federico CoriaCoria (4-2) – H2H and prediction
- Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli – (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alan MagadanMagadan – Tristan MccormickMccormick (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – (1-4) – H2H and prediction
