Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Kasidit Samrej will square off in the 2nd round of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on Center Court. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.08
Kasidit Samrej -> 6.2
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Kasidit Samrej
This will be the 3rd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Kasidit Samrej face off. The head to head is 1-1 for Lam Coleman Wong and Samrej (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Samrej won 6-7(1) 7-5 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Seoul Challenger back in 2024.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
42 - 31win/loss
92
92
WLWWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 42-31 | 38-22 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 32-30 | 20-18 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 92 (career-high), Chak reached the 2nd round after beating Jake Delaney 6-4 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, The had a good straight sets win against Delaney (6-4 7-64). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 80 points vs Delaney’s 69. The was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong overpowered his opponent with 23 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was very efficient on serve to win 85% (34/40) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The broke Delaney twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (206-161). 38-22 on hard in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled167-112 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Jiujiang Challenger where he defeated Adam Walton in the final 7-5 7-6(4).
Chak has a compiled 42-31 win-loss record in 2026, 38-22 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
Kasidit Samrej
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 37-25 | 31-20 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 47-31 | 28-26 | 0-0 | 19-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-23 | 34-19 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-20 | 23-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-16 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 382, Kasidit got to the 2nd round after defeating Naoya Honda 4-6 6-3 7-5, Yaroslav Demin 6-4 6-2 and Rio Noguchi 2-6 6-1 7-6(3).
In the 1st round against Noguchi, The Thai recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-1 7-63). During the match Samrej scored 83 points vs Noguchi’s 81. Kasidit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Samrej scored 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Kasidit Samrej lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Samrej put 64% of his first serves in, winning 70% (39/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (19/32) on the 2nd serve. Samrej broke Noguchi twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
The Thai’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Nakhon Pathom and the Zhangjiagang Challenger.
Samrej has a compiled 37-25 win-loss record in 2026, 31-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2025. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 59 |
| Pts | 80-69 | 176-166 |
| Total Points | 149 | 342 |
| Winners | 34 | 84 |
| %Winners | 43% | 48% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match while Samrej competed in 2 matches. Samrej started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Kasidit Samrej conceded 2 sets while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t dropped a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 4 set(s) less than Samrej (2 vs 6). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 36 games less than Samrej. Lam Coleman Wong scored 34 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Samrej bagged 84 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 23 | 24 |
| Avg per match | 23 | 12 |
| 1st in | 40/64 | 110/180 |
| %1st in | 63% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 34/40 | 84/110 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 37/70 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 53% |
Lam Coleman Wong made 23 aces . Samrej blasted 24 aces (12 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 85% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Samrej won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 33% | 42% |
| Conceded | 1 | 10 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Chak lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Thai broke his opponents 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Kasidit conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Delaney |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 80-69 | 80-69 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 23 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 40/64 | 40/64 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 34/40 | 34/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Samrej | ||||
| Q1 Honda |
R1 Noguchi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | 2-6 6-1 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 28 | 59 | |
| pts | 93-85 | 83-81 | 176-166 | |
| Total points | 178 | 164 | 342 | |
| Winners | 45 | 39 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 47% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 16 | 8 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 5 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 54/92 | 56/88 | 110/180 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 64% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 45/54 | 39/56 | 84/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 70% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/38 | 19/32 | 37/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 59% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 2/5 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 40% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 2/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 50% | 117% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger
- Cruz HewittHewitt – Rigele TeTe (4-6 6-4 7-611) – See score progression
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Luca CastelnuovoCastelnuovo (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Yi ZhouZhou – Koki MatsudaMatsuda (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Fajing SunSun – Qian SunSun (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – Ognjen MilicMilic (6-4 6-73 7-65) – See score progression
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-6 6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Jake DelaneyDelaney (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Elias YmerYmer (6-0 6-72 7-66) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Mert AlkayaAlkaya (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-6 6-1 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – Ognjen MilicMilic (6-4 6-7(3) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-6(1) 6-3) – See score progression
- Yi ZhouZhou – Koki MatsudaMatsuda (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Luca CastelnuovoCastelnuovo (7-6(5) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Fajing SunSun – Qian SunSun (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cruz HewittHewitt – Rigele TeTe (4-6 6-4 7-6(11)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Liam BroadyBroady – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sergey FominFomin – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Jie CuiCui (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Max PurcellPurcell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
