Iga Swiatek and Ashlyn Krueger will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the Wuhan Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 7:00 pm on Center Court. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Iga Swiatek who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Iga Swiatek is the pick to win this match.
Iga Swiatek -> 1.077
Ashlyn Krueger -> 7.8
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Iga Swiatek vs. Ashlyn Krueger
There is no head to head record between Iga Swiatek and Ashlyn Krueger since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Iga Swiatek
40 - 15win/loss
9
1
WLWWWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 40-15 | 29-9 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 64-17 | 40-10 | 11-4 | 3-2 | 10-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 64-9 | 29-5 | 26-2 | 7-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 68-11 | 42-8 | 19-2 | 0-0 | 7-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 67-9 | 42-6 | 18-1 | 5-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 9, Swiatek reached the 3rd round after beating Magdalena Frech 6-2 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Iga had a good straight sets win against Frech (6-2 6-1). During the match, Swiatek scored 73 points vs Frech’s 51. Iga was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Swiatek was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 4 double faults. Iga Swiatek lost the serve twice and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Swiatek put 69% of her first serves in, winning 61% (25/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the 2nd serve. Iga broke Frech 6 times after converting 38% of her break points (6/16).
WTA Wuhan - Iga Swiatek's projected path
Swiatek has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 81% of her matches (443-106). 29-9 on hard in 2026. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Swiatek has a compiled 231-61 record in the last years on hard.
Her best result of the current season was winning the title in Toronto where she defeated Elena Rybakina in the final 6-2 6-3.
Iga has an aggregate 40-15 win-loss record in 2026, 29-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wuhan
Previously, her best result was reaching the quarter in 2025. See her history.
Ashlyn Krueger
33 - 21win/loss
68
29
WWLWLWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 33-21 | 12-13 | 5-5 | 0-1 | 16-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 25-27 | 18-17 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-26 | 19-17 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-26 | 26-15 | 8-6 | 2-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-22 | 23-17 | 10-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 68, Ashlyn reached the 3rd round after defeating Taylah Preston 6-3 7-6(8), Yulia Putintseva 6-1 6-3, Shuai Zhang 6-3 6-0 and Lanlana Tararudee 2-6 6-1 6-1.
In the 2nd round against Tararudee, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-1 6-1). During the match Krueger scored 75 points vs Tararudee’s 64. Krueger was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Krueger bagged 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Ashlyn Krueger lost the serve 4 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 57% of her first serves in, winning 64% (25/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 40% (12/30) on the 2nd serve. Krueger broke Tararudee 7 times after converting 78% of her break points (7/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Krueger started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
WTA Wuhan - Ashlyn Krueger's projected path
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the Ilkley where she beat Celine Naef in the final 7-5 6-2.
Ashlyn has an aggregate 33-21 win-loss record in 2026, 12-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wuhan
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024 and 2025. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Swiatek | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 59 |
| Pts | 73-51 | 219-179 |
| Total Points | 124 | 398 |
| Winners | 25 | 85 |
| %Winners | 34% | 39% |
Swiatek played 1 match while Krueger competed in 3 matches. Krueger started her run from the qualifications while Swiatek had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Ashlyn Krueger surrendered 1 set while Iga Swiatek hasn’t conceded a set so far. Swiatek has played 5 set(s) less than Krueger (2 vs 7). Therefore, Swiatek played 44 games less than Krueger. The Pole scored 25 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Ashlyn fired 85 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Swiatek | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 41/59 | 122/217 |
| %1st in | 69% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 25/41 | 85/122 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 39/95 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 41% |
Swiatek didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Krueger bagged 17 aces (5.7 per match). Swiatek won 61% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 70% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Swiatek | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 17 |
| Converted | 6/16 | 17/24 |
| % Converted | 38% | 71% |
| Conceded | 9 | 25 |
| Saved | 7 | 16 |
| % Saved | 78% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 9 |
The Pole broke her opponent 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Pole dropped her serve twice and she saved 78% of the break points that she conceded. The American broke her opponents 17 times with a 71% conversion rate. Ashlyn conceded her serve 9 times and she saved 64% of the break points that she conceded.
| Swiatek | |||
| R2 Frech |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 73-51 | 73-51 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/59 | 41/59 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 25/41 | 25/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Krueger | |||||
| Q1 Preston |
R1 Zhang |
R2 Tararudee |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-68 | 6-3 6-0 | 2-6 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 15 | 22 | 59 | |
| pts | 81-73 | 63-42 | 75-64 | 219-179 | |
| Total points | 154 | 105 | 139 | 398 | |
| Winners | 36 | 24 | 25 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 38% | 33% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 9 | 2 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 2 | 3 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 49/89 | 34/59 | 39/69 | 122/217 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 58% | 57% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 36/49 | 24/34 | 25/39 | 85/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 71% | 64% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/40 | 10/25 | 12/30 | 39/95 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 40% | 40% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 7 | 17 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/9 | 7/9 | 17/24 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | 78% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 10 | 6 | 25 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 8/10 | 2/6 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 80% | 33% | 180% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Wuhan
- Karolina MuchovaMuchova – Caty McNallyMcNally (3-6 7-61 7-64) – See score progression
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Jessica PegulaPegula (2-6 7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Diana ShnaiderShnaider – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ann LiLi – Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka (3-6 6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (1-6 6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Iva JovicJovic – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Janice TjenTjen – Daria SnigurSnigur (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova (6-2 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Nikola BartunkovaBartunkova (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Anna Danilina/Shuai ZhangDanilina/Shuai Zhang – Anhelina Kalinina/Dayana YastremskaKalinina/Dayana Yastremska (w/o) – See score progression
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Magdalena FrechFrech (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Hanyu GuoGuo – Katie VolynetsVolynets (6-4 4-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Ashlyn KruegerKrueger – Lanlana TararudeeTararudee (2-6 6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Sonay KartalKartal – Belinda BencicBencic (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Sara Errani/Jasmine PaoliniErrani/Jasmine Paolini – Tereza Mihalikova/Olivia NichollsMihalikova/Olivia Nicholls (4-6 6-2 10-5) – See score progression
- Mia PohankovaPohankova – Xiyu WangWang (7-62 6-77 6-1) – See score progression
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Marta KostyukKostyuk (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ann LiLi – Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka (3-6 6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Janice TjenTjen – Daria SnigurSnigur (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Ashlyn KruegerKrueger – Lanlana TararudeeTararudee (2-6 6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Iva JovicJovic – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Hanyu GuoGuo – Katie VolynetsVolynets (6-4 4-6 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Nikola BartunkovaBartunkova (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Karolina MuchovaMuchova – Caty McNallyMcNally (3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Diana ShnaiderShnaider – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Jessica PegulaPegula (2-6 7-6(7) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ann LiLi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Hanyu GuoGuo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina MuchovaMuchova – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
