
Michael Mmoh and Jeff Wolf will square off in the semifinal of the Tiburon Challenger for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 4:00 pm on Court 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jeff Wolf who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jeff Wolf is the pick to win this match.
Jeff Wolf -> 1.48
Michael Mmoh -> 2.43
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Jeff Wolf
This will be the 5th time that Michael Mmoh and Jeff Wolf fight against each other. The head to head is 4-0 for Wolf (see full H2H stats), 3-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Wolf won 6-4 7-6(5) in the 3rd round in Washington back in 2023.
Highlights Jeff Wolf vs Michael Mmoh – Washington 03-August-2023
Michael Mmoh

30 - 18win/loss
148
81
LWWWWLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 30-19 | 26-12 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 17-16 | 7-7 | 3-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 178, the American reached the semifinal after defeating Karue Sell 6-3 6-2, Patrick Maloney 7-5 6-3 and Abedallah Shelbayh 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter, Mmoh had a good straight sets win against Shelbayh (6-4 6-4). During the match, Mmoh scored 63 points vs Shelbayh’s 52. The American was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mmoh scored 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Michael Mmoh lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Mmoh put 66% of his first serves in, winning 70% (26/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (8/19) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Shelbayh 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Michael hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to win 57% of the points he played.
ATP Tiburon Challenger - Michael Mmoh's projected path
Mmoh has good match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (260-197). 25-11 on hard in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Mmoh has an aggregate 160-112 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Morelos Challenger where he defeated Taro Daniel in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Michael has an overall 29-18 win-loss record in 2026, 25-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2018. See his history.
Jeff Wolf
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 26-11 | 18-7 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-26 | 11-16 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-26 | 16-13 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 23-15 | 8-4 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 246, the American reached the semifinal after beating Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi 6-2 6-0, Braden Shick 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 and Sebastian Gorzny 7-6(5) 1-6 7-5.
In the quarter, Jeff defeated Gorzny (7-65 1-6 7-5). During the match Wolf and Gorzny scored the same amount of points (106). However, the world no. 178 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Jeff was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Wolf fired 12 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Jeff Wolf was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 74% (42/57) of his 1st serve and 51% (27/53) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. Jeff broke Gorzny twice after converting 14% of his break points (2/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
ATP Tiburon Challenger - Jeff Wolf's projected path
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Vancouver Challenger where he defeated Mark Lajal in the final 7-5 6-1.
The American has an overall 26-9 win-loss record in 2026, 18-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mmoh | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 58 | 79 |
| Pts | 207-157 | 268-232 |
| Total Points | 364 | 500 |
| Winners | 81 | 106 |
| %Winners | 39% | 40% |
Both Mmoh and Wolf played 3 matches. At the moment, Jeff Wolf lost 2 sets while Michael Mmoh hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Mmoh has played 2 set(s) less than Wolf (6 vs 8). Therefore, Mmoh played 21 games less than Wolf. Michael scored 81 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 106 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mmoh | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7.7 |
| 1st in | 117/171 | 145/255 |
| %1st in | 68% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 81/117 | 106/145 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 26/54 | 63/110 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 57% |
Mmoh recorded 15 aces (5 per match). Wolf made 23 aces (7.7 per match). Mmoh won 69% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Wolf won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mmoh | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 10 |
| Converted | 16/27 | 10/33 |
| % Converted | 59% | 30% |
| Conceded | 18 | 15 |
| Saved | 11 | 10 |
| % Saved | 61% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 5 |
Mmoh broke his opponents 16 times with a 59% conversion rate. Mmoh surrendered his serve 7 times and he saved 61% of the break points that he conceded. Jeff broke his opponents 10 times with a 30% conversion rate. Wolf conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mmoh | |||||
| R1 Sell |
R2 Maloney |
1/4 Shelbayh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 21 | 20 | 58 | |
| pts | 70-50 | 74-55 | 63-52 | 207-157 | |
| Total points | 120 | 129 | 115 | 364 | |
| Winners | 29 | 26 | 26 | 81 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 35% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 8 | 4 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 44/56 | 36/59 | 37/56 | 117/171 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 61% | 66% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 29/44 | 26/36 | 26/37 | 81/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 72% | 70% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/12 | 14/23 | 8/19 | 26/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 61% | 42% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 5 | 16 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 5/7 | 5/8 | 16/27 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 71% | 63% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 | 7 | 18 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 3/5 | 4/7 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 60% | 57% | 61% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Wolf | |||||
| R1 Emanuel |
R2 Shick |
1/4 Gorzny |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | 6-4 6-75 6-4 | 7-65 1-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 33 | 32 | 79 | |
| pts | 50-21 | 112-105 | 106-106 | 268-232 | |
| Total points | 71 | 217 | 212 | 500 | |
| Winners | 19 | 45 | 42 | 106 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 12 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 21/36 | 67/109 | 57/110 | 145/255 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 61% | 52% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | 45/67 | 42/57 | 106/145 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 67% | 74% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 27/42 | 27/53 | 63/110 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 64% | 51% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/12 | 2/14 | 10/33 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 25% | 14% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 9 | 15 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 5/6 | 5/9 | 10 | |
| Saved % | – | 83% | 56% | 46% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Tiburon Challenger
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Bryce NakashimaNakashima (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael ZhengZheng – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Sebastian GorznyGorzny (7-65 1-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Jean-Julien Rojer/Theodore WinegarRojer/Theodore Winegar (4-6 6-3 10-8) – See score progression
- Michael ZhengZheng – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Bryce NakashimaNakashima (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Sebastian GorznyGorzny (7-6(5) 1-6 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Michael MmohMmoh – Jeff WolfWolf (0-4) – H2H and prediction







