Timo Legout and Bryce Nakashima will play each other in the 2nd round of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:00 pm on Court 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Timo Legout who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Timo Legout is the pick to win this match.
Timo Legout -> 1.42
Bryce Nakashima -> 2.61
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Timo Legout vs. Bryce Nakashima
There is no head to head record between Timo Legout and Bryce Nakashima since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Timo Legout
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 28-9 | 26-8 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-7 | 11-3 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-16 | 4-2 | 15-11 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 32-20 | 12-8 | 19-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 444, Timo reached the 2nd round after defeating Evan Bynoe 6-1 6-4, Daniil Ostapenkov 6-3 6-4 and Henry Searle 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Legout had a good straight sets win against Searle (6-1 6-4). During the match, Legout scored 60 points vs Searle’s 44. Legout was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Legout scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Timo Legout lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Legout put 63% of his first serves in, winning 67% (24/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the 2nd serve. Timo was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Searle 5 times.
Legout has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (134-80). 26-8 on hard in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Legout has a composed58-26 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Timo’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Southaven.
The French player has a compiled 28-9 win-loss record in 2026, 26-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Legout has never competed in this tournament before.
Bryce Nakashima
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 21-6 | 21-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-8 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 8-12 | 5-8 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-13 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 711 (career-high), the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Kaylan Bigun 7-5 6-0, Quinn Vandecasteele 6-2 6-4 and Andre Ilagan 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(3).
In the 1st round, Nakashima defeated Ilagan (7-5 6-74 7-63).During the match Nakashima scored less points (3) than Ilagan. In fact, the world no. 444 won 118 points vs Ilagan’s. That means that Nakashima was more focused during the important points. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 57 winners.
About the serving games, Nakashima fired 16 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Bryce Nakashima lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Nakashima put 60% of his first serves in, winning 80% (57/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (23/48) on the 2nd serve. Nakashima broke Ilagan twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Nakashima’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 San Diego and M15 Champaign.
Bryce has an overall 21-6 win-loss record in 2026, 21-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Legout | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 53 | 74 |
| Pts | 183-129 | 252-219 |
| Total Points | 312 | 471 |
| Winners | 81 | 108 |
| %Winners | 44% | 43% |
Both Legout and Nakashima played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Bryce Nakashima dropped 1 set while Timo Legout hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Legout has played 1 set(s) less than Nakashima (6 vs 7). Therefore, Legout played 21 games less than Nakashima. Timo scored 81 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 108 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Legout | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 24 |
| Avg per match | 0.3 | 8 |
| 1st in | 115/165 | 139/235 |
| %1st in | 70% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 81/115 | 108/139 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 31/50 | 48/96 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 50% |
Legout fired 1 ace (0.3 per match). Nakashima also struck 24 aces (8 per match). Legout won 70% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Nakashima won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Legout | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 12 |
| Converted | 13/16 | 12/29 |
| % Converted | 81% | 41% |
| Conceded | 17 | 13 |
| Saved | 13 | 9 |
| % Saved | 76% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
The French player broke his opponents 13 times with a 81% conversion rate. The French player lost his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. Nakashima broke his opponents 12 times with a 41% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Legout | |||||
| Q1 Bynoe |
Q3 Ostapenkov |
R1 Searle |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 | 17 | 53 | |
| pts | 58-38 | 65-47 | 60-44 | 183-129 | |
| Total points | 96 | 112 | 104 | 312 | |
| Winners | 26 | 31 | 24 | 81 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 48% | 40% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 37/49 | 42/59 | 36/57 | 115/165 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 71% | 63% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 26/37 | 31/42 | 24/36 | 81/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 74% | 67% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 12/17 | 11/21 | 31/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 71% | 52% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 3/5 | 5/5 | 13/16 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 60% | 100% | 81% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 3 | 6 | 17 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 2/3 | 4/6 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 67% | 67% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
| Nakashima | |||||
| Q1 Bigun |
Q3 Vandecasteele |
R1 Ilagan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 6-74 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | 38 | 74 | |
| pts | 62-40 | 72-58 | 118-121 | 252-219 | |
| Total points | 102 | 130 | 239 | 471 | |
| Winners | 18 | 33 | 57 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 46% | 48% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 16 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 6 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 22/51 | 46/65 | 71/119 | 139/235 | |
| % 1st in | 43% | 71% | 60% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 18/22 | 33/46 | 57/71 | 108/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 72% | 80% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/29 | 7/19 | 23/48 | 48/96 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 37% | 48% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/15 | 2/7 | 12/29 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 33% | 29% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 | 5 | 13 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 60% | 80% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Tiburon Challenger
- Sebastian GorznyGorzny – Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Tristan BoyerBoyer (7-62 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jeff WolfWolf – Braden ShickShick (6-4 6-75 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael MmohMmoh – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
