
Alevtina Ibragimova and Mariam Bolkvadze will square off in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 AM on Court 15. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mariam Bolkvadze who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mariam Bolkvadze is the pick to win this match.
Mariam Bolkvadze -> 1.8
Alevtina Ibragimova -> 1.95
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alevtina Ibragimova vs. Mariam Bolkvadze
There is no head to head record between Alevtina Ibragimova and Mariam Bolkvadze since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Alevtina Ibragimova

28 - 19win/loss
166
166
LWWWWLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 32-20 | 2-5 | 24-13 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 37-29 | 14-7 | 19-18 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-27 | 2-3 | 26-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-17 | 13-6 | 16-6 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 218 (career-high), Ibragimova got to the qualifications after beating Rebecca Sramkova 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Alevtina had a good straight sets win against Sramkova (6-2 6-4). During the match, Ibragimova scored 65 points vs Sramkova’s 50. Alevtina was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ibragimova scored 2 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Alevtina Ibragimova was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (24/32) of her 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Alevtina broke Sramkova 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
Ibragimova has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 61% of her matches (145-92). 2-4 on hard in 2026. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ibragimova has a compiled31-20 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Alevtina’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the W75 Blois.
Alevtina has a composed 28-18 win-loss record in 2026, 2-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
The Russian has never competed in this tournament before.
Mariam Bolkvadze

14 - 12win/loss
359
151
LWWLLLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 14-13 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 25-17 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 11-6 | 5-4 | 5-2 |
| 2024 | 42-21 | 22-11 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-8 | 20-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-33 | 6-13 | 0-7 | 8-8 | 2-4 | 3-1 |
Ranked no. 418, Bolkvadze got to the qualifications after beating Erika Andreeva 6-4 7-6(5).
In the qualifications, Bolkvadze had a good straight sets win against Andreeva (6-4 7-65). During the match Bolkvadze scored 87 points vs Andreeva’s 73. The Georgean was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Bolkvadze scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she was not very solid on her 2nd serve to score 13 double faults. Mariam Bolkvadze lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Bolkvadze put 66% of her first serves in, winning 80% (39/49) of the points behind her 1st serve and 32% (8/25) on the 2nd serve. Mariam broke Andreeva 4 times after converting 27% of her break points (4/15).
The Georgean has an aggregate 13-12 win-loss record in 2026, 4-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ibragimova | Bolkvadze |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 23 |
| Pts | 65-50 | 87-73 |
| Total Points | 115 | 160 |
| Winners | 24 | 39 |
| %Winners | 37% | 45% |
Both Ibragimova and Bolkvadze played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ibragimova and Bolkvadze have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Ibragimova played 5 games less than Bolkvadze. Alevtina scored 24 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Georgean managed to score 39 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ibragimova | Bolkvadze |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 32/50 | 49/74 |
| %1st in | 64% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 39/49 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 8/25 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 32% |
Ibragimova scored 2 aces . Bolkvadze scored 1 ace . Ibragimova won 75% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Bolkvadze won 80% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 32% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ibragimova | Bolkvadze |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/15 |
| % Converted | 50% | 27% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Alevtina broke her opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Ibragimova dropped her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Bolkvadze broke her opponent 4 times with a 27% conversion rate. The Georgean conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Ibragimova | |||
| Q1 Sramkova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-50 | 65-50 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 32/50 | 32/50 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Bolkvadze | |||
| Q1 Andreeva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 87-73 | 87-73 | |
| Total points | 160 | 160 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 13 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 49/74 | 49/74 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 39/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/25 | 8/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 32% | 32% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/15 | 4/15 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Sem VerbeekVerbeek – Lodewijk WeststrateWeststrate (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stijn PelPel – Vladimir IvanovIvanov (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Anna SiskovaSiskova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Mona BarthelBarthel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Joanna GarlandGarland (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yeon Woo KuWoo Ku – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Suzan LamensLamens (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Angela Fita BoludaFita Boluda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Francisca JorgeJorge – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie SwanSwan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction



