Linda Fruhvirtova and Carson Branstine will square off in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 AM on Court 7. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Linda Fruhvirtova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Linda Fruhvirtova is the pick to win this match.
Linda Fruhvirtova -> 1.68
Carson Branstine -> 2.11
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Linda Fruhvirtova vs. Carson Branstine
There is no head to head record between Linda Fruhvirtova and Carson Branstine since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Linda Fruhvirtova
17 - 21win/loss
181
49
WLLLWWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 22-24 | 16-14 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 34-25 | 23-16 | 2-5 | 2-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-31 | 11-21 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-28 | 15-19 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-18 | 20-7 | 7-7 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 174, Fruhvirtova got to the qualifications after defeating Polina Kudermetova 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Linda had a good straight sets win against Kudermetova (6-1 6-3). During the match, Fruhvirtova scored 70 points vs Kudermetova’s 46. Linda was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fruhvirtova recorded 2 aces and she committed only 7 double faults. Linda Fruhvirtova lost the serve twice and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Fruhvirtova put 51% of her first serves in, winning 71% (22/31) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. Linda broke Kudermetova 6 times after converting 60% of her break points (6/10).
Fruhvirtova has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 53% of her matches (155-140). 11-11 on hard in 2026. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Fruhvirtova has a compiled101-80 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Linda has an aggregate 17-20 win-loss record in 2026, 11-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See her history.
Carson Branstine
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 34-22 | 13-6 | 15-12 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-15 | 22-7 | 19-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-1 | 12-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 565, Branstine got to the qualifications after beating Clervie Ngounoue 6-2 7-6(3).
In the qualifications, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Ngounoue (6-2 7-63). During the match Branstine scored 75 points vs Ngounoue’s 62. Branstine was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Branstine wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 6 double faults. Carson Branstine lost the serve 3 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Branstine put 62% of her first serves in, winning 69% (27/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. The Canadian broke Ngounoue 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
The Canadian has an overall 2-2 win-loss record in 2026, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2025. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fruhvirtova | Branstine |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 21 |
| Pts | 70-46 | 75-62 |
| Total Points | 116 | 137 |
| Winners | 22 | 27 |
| %Winners | 31% | 36% |
Both Fruhvirtova and Branstine played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fruhvirtova and Branstine have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fruhvirtova played 5 games less than Branstine. Fruhvirtova scored 22 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Branstine struck 27 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fruhvirtova | Branstine |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 31/61 | 39/63 |
| %1st in | 51% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 27/39 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 11/24 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 46% |
Fruhvirtova blasted 2 aces . Branstine didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Fruhvirtova won 71% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Branstine won 69% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fruhvirtova | Branstine |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 60% | 56% |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The Czech broke her opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Czech lost her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. Carson broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Canadian conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded.
| Fruhvirtova | |||
| Q1 Kudermetova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 70-46 | 70-46 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 31/61 | 31/61 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 22/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 14/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Branstine | |||
| Q1 Ngounoue |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 75-62 | 75-62 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 39/63 | 39/63 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 27/39 | 27/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWW Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Sem VerbeekVerbeek – Lodewijk WeststrateWeststrate (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stijn PelPel – Vladimir IvanovIvanov (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Anna SiskovaSiskova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Mona BarthelBarthel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Joanna GarlandGarland (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yeon Woo KuWoo Ku – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Suzan LamensLamens (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Angela Fita BoludaFita Boluda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Francisca JorgeJorge – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie SwanSwan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
