Fabrizio Andaloro and Giulio Perego will play each other in the qualifications of the Roehampton 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on Court 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Fabrizio Andaloro who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Fabrizio Andaloro is the pick to win this match.
Fabrizio Andaloro -> 1.27
Giulio Perego -> 3.34
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Fabrizio Andaloro vs. Giulio Perego
There is no head to head record between Fabrizio Andaloro and Giulio Perego since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Fabrizio Andaloro
13 - 13win/loss
526
288
WLLWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 17-16 | 11-8 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 60-24 | 58-22 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-21 | 18-9 | 8-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-20 | 17-10 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-10 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 522, the Italian got to the qualifications after beating Tiago Cacao 7-5 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Cacao (7-5 6-1). During the match, Andaloro scored 69 points vs Cacao’s 52. Andaloro was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Andaloro scored just 1 ace and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Fabrizio Andaloro was quite efficient on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Fabrizio broke Cacao 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Andaloro has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (157-110). 8-5 on hard in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Andaloro has a composed109-57 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
The Italian has a compiled 13-13 win-loss record in 2026, 8-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Roehampton 2 Challenger
Fabrizio has never competed in this tournament before.
Giulio Perego
23 - 18win/loss
894
883
LWLWWLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 27-22 | 27-17 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 25-14 | 10-4 | 15-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 15-10 | 1-2 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-6 | 5-4 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 883 (career-high), Perego got to the qualifications after beating Arvid Nordquist 7-6(1) 4-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Italian defeated Nordquist (7-61 4-6 6-4). During the match Perego scored 105 points vs Nordquist’s 98. Perego was pretty aggressive to blast 53 winners.
About the serving games, Perego made 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Giulio Perego lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Perego put 79% of his first serves in, winning 63% (53/84) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the 2nd serve. Perego broke Nordquist 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Perego’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Mbombela.
Perego has an overall 23-18 win-loss record in 2026, 23-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Andaloro | Perego |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 33 |
| Pts | 69-52 | 105-98 |
| Total Points | 121 | 203 |
| Winners | 24 | 53 |
| %Winners | 35% | 50% |
Both Andaloro and Perego played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Giulio Perego lost 1 set while Fabrizio Andaloro hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Andaloro has played 1 set(s) less than Perego (2 vs 3). Therefore, Andaloro played 14 games less than Perego. The Italian scored 24 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Perego scored 53 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Andaloro | Perego |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 11 |
| 1st in | 31/55 | 84/107 |
| %1st in | 56% | 79% |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 53/84 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/23 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 57% |
Andaloro managed to score 1 ace . Perego also struck 11 aces . Andaloro won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Perego won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Andaloro | Perego |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 42% | 67% |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Andaloro broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Fabrizio conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Andaloro | |||
| Q1 Cacao |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 69-52 | 69-52 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/55 | 31/55 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 24/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Perego | |||
| Q1 Nordquist |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 105-98 | 105-98 | |
| Total points | 203 | 203 | |
| Winners | 53 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 84/107 | 84/107 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 53/84 | 53/84 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GautierGautier – Alec DeckersDeckers (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anton MatusevichMatusevich – Constantin Bittoun KouzmineBittoun Kouzmine (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- George LoffhagenLoffhagen – Alastair GrayGray (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max BasingBasing – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
