Bernard Tomic and Andre Ilagan will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Brownsburg Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 07:00 PM on BB WYNNE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernard Tomic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bernard Tomic is the pick to win this match.
Bernard Tomic -> 1.56
Andre Ilagan -> 2.24
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. Andre Ilagan
This will be the 3rd time that Bernard Tomic and Andre Ilagan fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Tomic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Tomic won 6-3 6-2 in the 2nd round in the Calgary Challenger back in 2024.
Bernard Tomic
23 - 19win/loss
185
17
WWWLWLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 28-22 | 22-14 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 43-34 | 30-24 | 6-7 | 2-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-29 | 34-19 | 12-5 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160, Bernard reached the 2nd round after beating Edward Winter 6-7(3) 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Winter, Bernard recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-4 6-3). During the match, Tomic scored 118 points vs Winter’s 105. Bernard was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tomic blasted 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Bernard Tomic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Tomic put 52% of his first serves in, winning 72% (41/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (25/52) on the 2nd serve. Tomic broke Winter 5 times after converting 29% of his break points (5/17).
Tomic has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (253-203). 17-11 on hard in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Tomic has an aggregate 170-113 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Lincoln Challenger where he defeated Mark Lajal in the final 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3).
The Australian has an overall 23-19 win-loss record in 2026, 17-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brownsburg Challenger
Bernard has never competed in this tournament before.
Andre Ilagan
39 - 22win/loss
181
181
LLWLWWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 42-25 | 27-19 | 0-0 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 35-33 | 30-27 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-29 | 41-22 | 0-0 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-6 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 243 (career-high), Andre got to the 2nd round after defeating Andres Martin 2-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Martin, Andre recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-4 6-3).During the match Ilagan scored less points (1) than Martin. In fact, the world no. 160 won 78 points vs Martin’s. That means that Ilagan was more focused during the important points. Andre was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Ilagan blasted 3 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Andre Ilagan lost the serve 4 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Ilagan put 69% of his first serves in, winning 60% (31/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the 2nd serve. Andre broke Martin 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The American’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Maanshan,the Tyler Challenger and the Lexington Challenger.
Ilagan has an overall 39-22 win-loss record in 2026, 24-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tomic | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 27 |
| Pts | 118-105 | 78-79 |
| Total Points | 223 | 157 |
| Winners | 41 | 31 |
| %Winners | 35% | 40% |
Both Tomic and Ilagan played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Bernard Tomic lost 1 set, while Andre Ilagan lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Tomic and Ilagan have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Tomic played 5 games more than Ilagan. Bernard scored 41 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Ilagan fired 31 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tomic | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 3 |
| 1st in | 57/109 | 52/75 |
| %1st in | 52% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 41/57 | 31/52 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 25/52 | 12/23 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 52% |
Tomic recorded 7 aces . Ilagan managed to score 3 aces . Tomic won 72% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Ilagan won 60% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tomic | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/17 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 29% | 56% |
| Conceded | 8 | 5 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 63% | 20% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Bernard broke his opponent 5 times with a 29% conversion rate. Tomic lost his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Ilagan broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Ilagan conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 20% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tomic | |||
| R1 Winter |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-73 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 118-105 | 118-105 | |
| Total points | 223 | 223 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 57/109 | 57/109 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 41/57 | 41/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/52 | 25/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/17 | 5/17 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Ilagan | |||
| R1 Martin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 78-79 | 78-79 | |
| Total points | 157 | 157 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 52/75 | 52/75 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 31/52 | 31/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Brownsburg Challenger
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Liam BroadyBroady (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Felix GillGill – Colton SmithSmith (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Mees RottgeringRottgering – Henry SearleSearle (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Tyler ZinkZink (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Rei SakamotoSakamoto – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (6-73 7-66 7-63) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Edward WinterWinter (6-73 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Andrew FentyFenty (7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Andres MartinMartin (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Harry WendelkenWendelken – Borna GojoGojo (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Michael MmohMmoh (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Felix BalshawBalshaw (5-7 7-5 7-60) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Edward WinterWinter (6-7(3) 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Liam BroadyBroady (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Andre IlaganIlagan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
