
Edas Butvilas and Daniel Milavsky will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Brownsburg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 AM on BB WYNNE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Edas Butvilas who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Edas Butvilas is the pick to win this match.
Edas Butvilas -> 1.42
Daniel Milavsky -> 2.61
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Edas Butvilas vs. Daniel Milavsky
There is no head to head record between Edas Butvilas and Daniel Milavsky since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Edas Butvilas

29 - 22win/loss
198
194
WLLWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 34-25 | 22-10 | 12-11 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 32-32 | 20-12 | 2-10 | 10-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 54-26 | 28-12 | 26-11 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 9-9 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 268, Butvilas got to the 2nd round after defeating Michael Mmoh 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round, Butvilas had a good straight sets win against Mmoh (6-3 7-5). During the match, Butvilas scored 65 points vs Mmoh’s 51. Butvilas was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Butvilas scored just 1 ace in the match and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Edas Butvilas was quite effective on serve to win 74% (31/42) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Edas broke Mmoh 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Butvilas has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (152-117). 17-7 on hard in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Butvilas has a compiled80-43 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Lexington Challenger where he defeated Andre Ilagan in the final 6-2 1-6 7-6(6).
Edas has a compiled 29-21 win-loss record in 2026, 17-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brownsburg Challenger
The Lithuanian has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Milavsky

37 - 19win/loss
312
306
LLLWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 38-22 | 18-14 | 1-2 | 15-5 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 44-22 | 30-15 | 1-1 | 13-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-3 | 3-2 | 2-1 | 7-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 8-4 | 7-4 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 306 (career-high), Milavsky got to the 2nd round after defeating Felix Balshaw 5-7 7-5 7-6(0).
In the 1st round against Balshaw, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-5 7-60). During the match Milavsky scored 121 points vs Balshaw’s 113. Daniel was pretty aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Milavsky made 10 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel Milavsky lost the serve 6 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Milavsky put 65% of his first serves in, winning 68% (48/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (18/38) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Balshaw 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Villahermosa.
Milavsky has an overall 36-19 win-loss record in 2026, 16-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Butvilas | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 37 |
| Pts | 65-51 | 121-113 |
| Total Points | 116 | 234 |
| Winners | 31 | 48 |
| %Winners | 48% | 40% |
Both Butvilas and Milavsky played 1 match. At the moment, Daniel Milavsky lost 1 set while Edas Butvilas hasn’t conceded a set so far. Butvilas has played 1 set(s) less than Milavsky (2 vs 3). Therefore, Butvilas played 16 games less than Milavsky. Butvilas scored 31 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel blasted 48 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Butvilas | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 10 |
| 1st in | 42/63 | 71/109 |
| %1st in | 67% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 31/42 | 48/71 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 18/38 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 47% |
Butvilas made 1 ace . Milavsky also recorded 10 aces . Butvilas won 74% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Milavsky won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Butvilas | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 10 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The Lithuanian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Lithuanian lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Milavsky conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
| Butvilas | |||
| R1 Mmoh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 65-51 | 65-51 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 42/63 | 42/63 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 31/42 | 31/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Milavsky | |||
| R1 Balshaw |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-5 7-60 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 37 | 37 | |
| pts | 121-113 | 121-113 | |
| Total points | 234 | 234 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 71/109 | 71/109 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 48/71 | 48/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/38 | 18/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/10 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Brownsburg Challenger
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Liam BroadyBroady (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Rei SakamotoSakamoto – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (6-73 7-66 7-63) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Tyler ZinkZink (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Edward WinterWinter (6-73 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Mees RottgeringRottgering – Henry SearleSearle (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Andrew FentyFenty (7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- Felix GillGill – Colton SmithSmith (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Andres MartinMartin (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Michael MmohMmoh (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Harry WendelkenWendelken – Borna GojoGojo (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Felix BalshawBalshaw (5-7 7-5 7-60) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Edward WinterWinter (6-7(3) 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Tyler ZinkZink (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Felix GillGill – Colton SmithSmith (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Liam BroadyBroady (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Rei SakamotoSakamoto – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (6-7(3) 7-6(6) 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Andre IlaganIlagan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction







