Learner Tien and Thiago Agustin Tirante will play each other in the 4th round of the National Bank Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 3:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Learner Tien who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Learner Tien is the pick to win this match.
Learner Tien -> 1.31
Thiago Agustin Tirante -> 3.44
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Learner Tien vs. Thiago Agustin Tirante
There is no head to head record between Learner Tien and Thiago Agustin Tirante since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Learner Tien
23 - 13win/loss
13
12
LWLWWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 30-17 | 18-9 | 9-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 43-26 | 26-13 | 3-7 | 10-2 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 63-14 | 53-8 | 0-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-10 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 19, Learner reached the 4th round after defeating Gael Monfils 6-3 0-6 6-3 and Tommy Paul 6-3 6-2.
In the 3rd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Paul (6-3 6-2). During the match, Tien scored 60 points vs Paul’s 49. Tien was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tien was unable to score even 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Learner Tien lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Tien put 67% of his first serves in, winning 70% (26/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (7/18) on the 2nd serve. Learner broke Paul 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Tien has dropped 1 set in this tournament to conquer 52% of the points he played.
ATP Montreal - Learner Tien's projected path
Tien has a fantastic match record in the last 5 years having won 70% of his matches (171-74). 12-6 on hard in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Tien has a compiled119-42 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title in Geneva where he beat Mariano Navone in the final 3-6 6-3 7-5.
Tien has an aggregate 23-13 win-loss record in 2026, 12-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Toronto
Previously, his best result was reaching the 4th round in 2025. See his history.
Thiago Agustin Tirante
27 - 16win/loss
52
42
WLLWWWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 32-19 | 14-9 | 15-7 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 50-33 | 14-7 | 35-22 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-30 | 5-4 | 26-22 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-31 | 13-10 | 29-19 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-31 | 2-4 | 25-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 65, the Argentine got to the 4th round after defeating Duncan Chan 6-3 1-6 7-6(3), Taylor Fritz 7-5 6-3 and Alexei Popyrin 6-3 6-4.
In the 3rd round, Thiago had a good straight sets win against Popyrin (6-3 6-4). During the match Agustin scored 60 points vs Popyrin’s 47. Agustin was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Agustin scored 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Thiago Agustin Tirante was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 75% (18/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Thiago broke Popyrin twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Agustin has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
ATP Montreal - Thiago Agustin Tirante's projected path
The Argentine has a composed 27-16 win-loss record in 2026, 10-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Toronto
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tien | Agustin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 69 |
| Pts | 150-140 | 215-187 |
| Total Points | 290 | 402 |
| Winners | 63 | 75 |
| %Winners | 42% | 35% |
Tien played 2 matches while Agustin competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Learner Tien conceded 1 set, while Thiago Agustin Tirante conceded 1 set. Tien has played 2 set(s) less than Agustin (5 vs 7). Therefore, Tien played 28 games less than Agustin. Tien scored 63 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Thiago scored 75 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tien | Agustin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 1.5 | 7.7 |
| 1st in | 97/149 | 89/180 |
| %1st in | 65% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 63/97 | 75/89 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 23/52 | 58/91 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 64% |
Tien managed to score 3 aces (1.5 per match). Agustin made 23 aces (7.7 per match). Tien won 65% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Agustin won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tien | Agustin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 7 |
| Converted | 10/22 | 7/14 |
| % Converted | 45% | 50% |
| Conceded | 18 | 10 |
| Saved | 12 | 7 |
| % Saved | 67% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 3 |
The American broke his opponents 10 times with a 45% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Argentine broke his opponents 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Agustin conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tien | ||||
| R2 Monfils |
R3 Paul |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 0-6 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 17 | 41 | |
| pts | 90-91 | 60-49 | 150-140 | |
| Total points | 181 | 109 | 290 | |
| Winners | 37 | 26 | 63 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 43% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 60/94 | 37/55 | 97/149 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 67% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 37/60 | 26/37 | 63/97 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 70% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/34 | 7/18 | 23/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 39% | 44% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 6/12 | 10/22 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 50% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 5 | 18 | |
| Saved | 9/13 | 3/5 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 60% | 65% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Agustin | |||||
| R1 Chan |
R2 Fritz |
R3 Popyrin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 1-6 7-63 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 21 | 19 | 69 | |
| pts | 82-87 | 73-53 | 60-47 | 215-187 | |
| Total points | 169 | 126 | 107 | 402 | |
| Winners | 28 | 25 | 22 | 75 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | 37% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 9 | 9 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 36/76 | 26/53 | 27/51 | 89/180 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 49% | 53% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 25/26 | 22/27 | 75/89 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 96% | 81% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/40 | 18/27 | 18/24 | 58/91 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 67% | 75% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 3/6 | 2/3 | 7/14 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 50% | 67% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 0 | 10 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 4/4 | 0/0 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | – | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Montreal
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Nuno BorgesBorges (4-6 6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
