Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Anton Shepp will play each other in the 2nd round of the Lincoln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 7:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.178
Anton Shepp -> 4.2
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Anton Shepp
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Anton Shepp since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
26 - 23win/loss
108
92
LWWWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 37-29 | 33-20 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 32-30 | 20-18 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 111, the got to the 2nd round after beating Tung-Lin Wu 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Lam Coleman Wong had a good straight sets win against Wu (6-2 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 55 points vs Wu’s 32. Lam Coleman Wong was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong fired 6 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong was exceptionally effective on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 80% (16/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Chak broke Wu 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 55% of his matches (189-153). 21-14 on hard in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed150-104 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Jiujiang Challenger where he beat Adam Walton in the final 7-5 7-6(4).
The has a composed 25-23 win-loss record in 2026, 21-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2024. See his history.
Anton Shepp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 37-19 | 30-14 | 2-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 35-14 | 27-10 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 6-6 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-4 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 516, Anton got to the 2nd round after defeating Jack Kennedy 6-4 2-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Anton defeated Kennedy (6-4 2-6 6-3). During the match Shepp scored 93 points vs Kennedy’s 92. The Kiwi was exceptionally aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Shepp recorded 10 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Anton Shepp lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Shepp put 53% of his first serves in, winning 73% (35/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (17/43) on the 2nd serve. Anton broke Kennedy 5 times after converting 29% of his break points (5/17).
Shepp’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Nakhon Pathom.
Anton has an overall 35-10 win-loss record in 2026, 28-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Shepp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 27 |
| Pts | 55-32 | 93-92 |
| Total Points | 87 | 185 |
| Winners | 18 | 35 |
| %Winners | 33% | 38% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Shepp played 1 match. At the moment, Anton Shepp conceded 1 set while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t conceded a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set(s) less than Shepp (2 vs 3). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 11 games less than Shepp. Lam Coleman Wong scored 18 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Anton blasted 35 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Shepp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 10 |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 48/91 |
| %1st in | 55% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 35/48 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 16/20 | 17/43 |
| %2nd pts | 80% | 40% |
Lam Coleman Wong fired 6 aces . Shepp recorded 10 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 75% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 80% of the points. On the other side, Shepp won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Shepp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/17 |
| % Converted | 80% | 29% |
| Conceded | 2 | 10 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Anton broke his opponent 5 times with a 29% conversion rate. Shepp conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Wu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 55-32 | 55-32 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 24/44 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/20 | 16/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Shepp | |||
| R1 Kennedy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 93-92 | 93-92 | |
| Total points | 185 | 185 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 48/91 | 48/91 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 35/48 | 35/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/43 | 17/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/17 | 5/17 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Lincoln Challenger
- Mark LajalLajal – Trevor SvajdaSvajda (5-7 7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Matthew ForbesForbes – Sebastian GorznyGorzny (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Moez EcharguiEchargui (4-6 7-62 7-64) – See score progression
- Jie CuiCui – Thomas FancuttFancutt (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Spencer JohnsonJohnson – Remy BertolaBertola (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Andre IlaganIlagan (4-6 6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Evan ZhuZhu (4-6 7-64 7-68) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Alex MartinezMartinez (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Anton SheppShepp – Jack KennedyKennedy (6-4 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Andrew FentyFenty (6-711 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Charles BroomBroom (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (6-4 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Spencer JohnsonJohnson – Remy BertolaBertola (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Moez EcharguiEchargui (4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Evan ZhuZhu (4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(8)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yibing WuWu – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
