Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi and Hernan Casanova will square off in the 2nd round of the Bogota Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 2:30 pm on COURT KIA. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hernan Casanova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hernan Casanova is the pick to win this match.
Hernan Casanova -> 1.8
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi -> 1.88
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi vs. Hernan Casanova
This will be the 2nd time that Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi and Hernan Casanova square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Emanuel Ambrogi (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Emanuel Ambrogi won 5-7 2-0 ret. in the quarter in M25 Koksijde back in 2023.
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 33-23 | 0-1 | 33-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 39-30 | 0-0 | 39-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-30 | 1-3 | 41-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-23 | 0-0 | 45-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-14 | 0-1 | 29-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 320 (career-high), Emanuel Ambrogi reached the 2nd round after defeating Sergio Luis Hernandez Ramirez 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round, Luciano had a good straight sets win against Luis Hernandez Ramirez (7-5 6-4). During the match, Emanuel Ambrogi scored 76 points vs Luis Hernandez Ramirez’s 61. Emanuel Ambrogi was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Emanuel Ambrogi made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Emanuel Ambrogi put 60% of his first serves in, winning 71% (29/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. Luciano broke Luis Hernandez Ramirez 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Emanuel Ambrogi has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 62% of his matches (186-114). 31-17 on clay in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Emanuel Ambrogi has an aggregate185-110 win-loss record in the last 5 years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger where he defeated Johan Alexander Rodriguez in the final 6-2 6-3.
Luciano has a composed 31-17 win-loss record in 2026, 31-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bogota Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2025. See his history.
Hernan Casanova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 19-14 | 0-0 | 19-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 46-23 | 0-0 | 43-22 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-24 | 0-0 | 32-23 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 0-2 | 29-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 409, Hernan reached the 2nd round after beating Ignacio Monzon 7-5 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Monzon (7-5 7-5). During the match Casanova scored 90 points vs Monzon’s 73. The Argentine was exceptionally aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Casanova fired 2 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Hernan Casanova lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Casanova put 76% of his first serves in, winning 65% (42/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Monzon 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Casanova’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Santos Challenger and the Quito Challenger.
Casanova has an aggregate 16-10 win-loss record in 2026, 16-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bogota Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2025. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Emanuel Ambrogi | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 24 |
| Pts | 76-61 | 90-73 |
| Total Points | 137 | 163 |
| Winners | 29 | 42 |
| %Winners | 38% | 47% |
Both Emanuel Ambrogi and Casanova played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Emanuel Ambrogi and Casanova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Emanuel Ambrogi played 2 games less than Casanova. The Argentine scored 29 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Casanova scored 42 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Emanuel Ambrogi | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 41/68 | 65/86 |
| %1st in | 60% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 42/65 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/21 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 62% |
Emanuel Ambrogi managed to score 6 aces . Casanova scored 2 aces . Emanuel Ambrogi won 71% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Casanova won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Emanuel Ambrogi | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 71% | 67% |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 |
| Saved | 2 | 7 |
| % Saved | 40% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Luciano broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Argentine surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Hernan broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Hernan conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Emanuel Ambrogi | |||
| R1 Luis Hernandez Ramirez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 76-61 | 76-61 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 41/68 | 41/68 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 29/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Casanova | |||
| R1 Monzon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 90-73 | 90-73 | |
| Total points | 163 | 163 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 65/86 | 65/86 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 42/65 | 42/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Bogota Challenger
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lucas Andrade Da SilvaAndrade Da Silva – Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves (4-6 6-4 7-60) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Matias SotoSoto – Alan MagadanMagadan (7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Luis Carlos AlvarezCarlos Alvarez (7-64 6-74 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo MenaMena – Tristan MccormickMccormick (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-1) – H2H and prediction
