H2H, prediction of Yi Zhou vs Daniel De Jonge in Nottingham 3 Challenger with odds, preview, pick | 8th July 2026

PREVIEW. Nottingham 3 Challenger. Zhou and De will play each other in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 3 Challenger. See the prediction, H2H stats, odds, and preview of their upcoming match on Wednesday the 8th of July

Prediction and head to head Yi Zhou vs. Daniel De Jonge

Yi Zhou and Daniel De Jonge will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yi Zhou who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Yi Zhou is the pick to win this match.
Yi Zhou -> 1.27
Daniel De Jonge -> 3.34

 

 

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Sure Win Arbitrage

Prediction and head to head Yi Zhou vs. Daniel De Jonge

There is no head to head record between Yi Zhou and Daniel De Jonge since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.

Yi Zhou

Yi Zhou
Yi Zhou

16 - 14win/loss

Hard
9-9
I Hard
0-0
Clay
0-2
Grass
7-3
Rank
273
High
217
LWWLLLWLWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2026 21-20 13-14 0-2 0-0 8-4 0-0
2025 25-27 25-27 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
2024 29-25 29-23 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-0
2023 10-17 9-12 1-5 0-0 0-0 0-0
2022 1-1 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 240, Zhou reached the 2nd round after defeating Robin Catry 6-4 6-3.

In the 1st round, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Catry (6-4 6-3). During the match, Zhou scored 68 points vs Catry’s 58. The Chinese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.

Talking about the service games, Zhou made 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Yi Zhou lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Zhou put 51% of his first serves in, winning 76% (26/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (15/33) on the 2nd serve. Zhou broke Catry 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).

Zhou has a unfavourable win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 49% of his matches (81-84). 7-3 on grass in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Zhou has a compiled7-3 record in the last 5 years on grass.

Zhou’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Phan Thiet 2 Challenger.

Zhou has an overall 16-14 win-loss record in 2026, 7-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Nottingham 3 Challenger

Yi has never competed in this tournament before.

Zhou
Nottingham 3 Challenger
Zhou's Record

Daniel De Jonge

Daniel De Jonge
Daniel De Jonge

21 - 8win/loss

Hard
6-3
I Hard
9-4
Clay
0-1
Grass
1-0
Carpet
5-0
Rank
583
High
562
WLWLLWWWLW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2026 30-15 10-5 0-2 10-6 1-1 9-1
2025 33-22 12-8 0-4 20-9 0-0 1-1
2024 14-21 4-5 9-11 1-5 0-0 0-0
2023 29-17 17-9 5-5 4-2 0-0 3-1
2022 4-5 2-1 2-4 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 619, Daniel got to the 2nd round after beating Emile Hudd 7-6(6) 6-4.

In the 1st round, De had a good straight sets win against Hudd (7-66 6-4). During the match De scored 78 points vs Hudd’s 73. Daniel was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.

Talking about serving, De recorded 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel De Jonge conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, De put 62% of his first serves in, winning 84% (42/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. De was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Hudd once.

Daniel’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Cadolzburg,M15 Sherbrooke and M15 Monastir.

Daniel has an aggregate 21-8 win-loss record in 2026, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).

De
Nottingham 3 Challenger
De's Record
Sure Win Arbitrage
Soccer Tonic Predictions

H2H Performance in the tournament

Y.Zhou
D.De Jonge
1h:28
1h:28
Time on court​
1h:42
1h:42
1h:28
1h:28
Last match​
1h:42
1h:42
1
1
Match played
1
1
19
19
Games Played​
23
23
2
2
Set played​​
2
2
68
68
Total points​
78
78
68
68
Avg point​
78
78
26
26
Winners
42
42
26
26
Avg Winners​
42
42
38%
38%
Ratio winners
54%
54%
-- Serve --
4
4
Aces
5
5
4
4
Avg Aces
5
5
4
4
Double Faults
3
3
4
4
Avg Double Faults
3
3
26/34
26/34
1st won total​
42/50
42/50
!
76%
76%
1st won %
!
84%
84%
15/33
15/33
2nd won total​
15/31
15/31
45%
45%
2nd won %
48%
48%
-- Break Points --
4/13
4/13
BP won
1/1
1/1
4/13
4/13
Avg BP won
1/1
1/1
31%
31%
Won
!
100%
100%
8
8
Conceded
3
3
8
8
Avg Conceded
3
3
2
2
Broken
0
0
2
2
Avg Broken
!
0
0
6
6
Saved
3
3

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Zhou De
Match played 1 1
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 19 23
Pts 68-58 78-73
Total Points 126 151
Winners 26 42
%Winners 38% 54%

Both Zhou and De played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Zhou and De have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Zhou played 4 games less than De. The Chinese scored 26 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, De made 42 winners (54%).

Serve Performance

Serve Zhou De
Aces 4 5
Avg per match 4 5
1st in 34/67 50/81
%1st in 51% 62%
1st pts 26/34 42/50
%1st pts 76% 84%
2nd pts 15/33 15/31
%2nd pts 45% 48%

Zhou struck 4 aces . De blasted 5 aces . Zhou won 76% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, De won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Zhou De
Won 4 1
Converted 4/13 1/1
% Converted 31% 100%
Conceded 8 3
Saved 6 3
% Saved 75% 100%
Times Broken 2 0

Zhou broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. The Chinese dropped his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent once with a 100% conversion rate. The Dutch was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.

Zhou
R1
Catry
Total
Score 6-4 6-3
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 19 19
pts 68-58 68-58
Total points 126 126
Winners 26 26
%Winners 38% 38%
SERVE
Aces 4 4
Double Faults 4 4
1st in 34/67 34/67
% 1st in 51% 51%
1st pts 26/34 26/34
% 1st pts 76% 76%
2nd pts 15/33 15/33
% 2nd pts 45% 45%
Breaks
Won 4 4
Converted 4/13 4/13
Converted % 31% 31%
Conceded 8 8
Saved 6/8 6
Saved % 75% 75%
Times Broken 2 2
De
R1
Hudd
Total
Score 7-66 6-4
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 23 23
pts 78-73 78-73
Total points 151 151
Winners 42 42
%Winners 54% 54%
SERVE
Aces 5 5
Double Faults 3 3
1st in 50/81 50/81
% 1st in 62% 62%
1st pts 42/50 42/50
% 1st pts 84% 84%
2nd pts 15/31 15/31
% 2nd pts 48% 48%
Breaks
Won 1 1
Converted 1/1 1/1
Converted % 100% 100%
Conceded 3 3
Saved 3/3 3
Saved % 100% 100%
Times Broken 0 0

Head 2 Head

Win Loss
Zhou
WWWWWWWWWW
De Jonge
WWWWWWWWWW
2026 2025 2024
21 - 20
30 - 15
13-14
Hard
10-5
0-0
I Hard
10-6
8-4
Grass
1-1
0-0
Carpet
9-1

Tennis Scores in Nottingham 3 Challenger

See Updated Draw
Soccer Tonic Predictions
Sure Win Arbitrage

Upcoming matches in the draw