William Manning and Michael Mmoh will square off in the 2nd round of the Cary Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 9:00 am on COURT 13. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Mmoh is the pick to win this match.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.148
William Manning -> 4.65
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head William Manning vs. Michael Mmoh
There is no head to head record between William Manning and Michael Mmoh since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
William Manning
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 11-7 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 4-9 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 7-6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, William reached the 2nd round after defeating Giles Hussey 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Hussey (6-1 6-2). During the match, Manning scored 53 points vs Hussey’s 20. Manning was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Manning was unable to score even 1 ace in the match and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. William Manning was pretty effective on serve to win 92% (24/26) of his 1st serve and 89% (8/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. William broke Hussey 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Manning has won exactly 50% of his matches (18-18) in the last 3 years. 7-3 on hard in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Manning has a composed13-11 record in the last 3 years on hard.
Manning has an aggregate 7-3 win-loss record in 2026, 7-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cary Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2025. See his history.
Michael Mmoh
24 - 14win/loss
148
81
LWWWWLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 30-19 | 26-12 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 17-16 | 7-7 | 3-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 192, Mmoh got to the 2nd round after defeating Yuta Shimizu 7-6(3) 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, Mmoh had a good straight sets win against Shimizu (7-63 7-65). During the match Mmoh scored 86 points vs Shimizu’s 82. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Mmoh managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Michael Mmoh was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (31/40) of his 1st serve and 59% (26/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Michael broke Shimizu once after converting 14% of his break points (1/7).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Morelos Challenger where he defeated Taro Daniel in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Mmoh has a composed 24-13 win-loss record in 2026, 20-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cary Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Manning | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 26 |
| Pts | 53-20 | 86-82 |
| Total Points | 73 | 168 |
| Winners | 24 | 31 |
| %Winners | 45% | 36% |
Both Manning and Mmoh played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Manning and Mmoh have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Manning played 11 games less than Mmoh. Manning scored 24 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Mmoh scored 31 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Manning | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 7 |
| 1st in | 26/35 | 40/84 |
| %1st in | 74% | 48% |
| 1st pts | 24/26 | 31/40 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 8/9 | 26/44 |
| %2nd pts | 89% | 59% |
Manning didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Mmoh scored 7 aces . Manning won 92% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 89% of the points. On the other side, Mmoh won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Manning | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 1 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 1/7 |
| % Converted | 80% | 14% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Manning broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Manning had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Michael broke his opponent once with a 14% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Manning | |||
| R1 Hussey |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 53-20 | 53-20 | |
| Total points | 73 | 73 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 26/35 | 26/35 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 24/26 | 24/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/9 | 8/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 89% | 89% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Mmoh | |||
| R1 Shimizu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 86-82 | 86-82 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 40/84 | 40/84 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 31/40 | 31/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/44 | 26/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/7 | 1/7 | |
| Converted % | 14% | 14% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Cary Challenger
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – Jeff WolfWolf (5-7 7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-78 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-63 7-65) – See score progression
- Edward WinterWinter – Andrew FentyFenty (3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Jack KennedyKennedy – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Andre IlaganIlagan (3-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Aidan MayoMayo (7-61 2-6 7-65) – See score progression
- William ManningManning – Giles HusseyHussey (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Edward WinterWinter – Andrew FentyFenty (3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – Jeff WolfWolf (5-7 7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Liam BroadyBroady – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Tung-Lin WuWu (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Alex MartinezMartinez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Liam DraxlDraxl (1-0) – H2H and prediction
