
Edas Butvilas and Andre Ilagan will square off in the 2nd round of the Tyler Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on STADIUM COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Edas Butvilas who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Edas Butvilas is the pick to win this match.
Edas Butvilas -> 1.58
Andre Ilagan -> 2.2
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Edas Butvilas vs. Andre Ilagan
There is no head to head record between Edas Butvilas and Andre Ilagan since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Edas Butvilas

23 - 15win/loss
198
194
WLLWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 34-25 | 22-10 | 12-11 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 32-32 | 20-12 | 2-10 | 10-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 54-26 | 28-12 | 26-11 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 9-9 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 232, the Lithuanian got to the 2nd round after defeating Trevor Svajda 7-6(1) 6-4.
In the 1st round, Edas had a good straight sets win against Svajda (7-61 6-4). During the match, Butvilas scored 68 points vs Svajda’s 59. Butvilas was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Butvilas blasted 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Edas Butvilas was quite efficient on serve to win 83% (25/30) of his 1st serve and 65% (20/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Edas broke Svajda twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Butvilas has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (146-110). 11-5 on hard in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Butvilas has a compiled74-41 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Edas’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Soma Bay Challenger,the Pune Challenger and the Shymkent 2 Challenger.
Butvilas has a composed 23-14 win-loss record in 2026, 11-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
Butvilas has never competed in this tournament before.
Andre Ilagan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 42-26 | 27-20 | 0-0 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 35-33 | 30-27 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-29 | 41-22 | 0-0 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-6 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 335, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Fajing Sun 6-3 7-6(1).
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Sun (6-3 7-61). During the match Ilagan scored 77 points vs Sun’s 68. Andre was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Ilagan bagged 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Andre Ilagan lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Ilagan put 55% of his first serves in, winning 67% (29/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (17/35) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Sun 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Andre’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Maanshan.
The American has an overall 27-15 win-loss record in 2026, 15-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Butvilas | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 22 |
| Pts | 68-59 | 77-68 |
| Total Points | 127 | 145 |
| Winners | 25 | 29 |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% |
Both Butvilas and Ilagan played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Butvilas and Ilagan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Butvilas played 1 game more than Ilagan. Butvilas scored 25 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The American recorded 29 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Butvilas | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 8 |
| 1st in | 30/61 | 43/78 |
| %1st in | 49% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 29/43 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 20/31 | 17/35 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 49% |
Butvilas managed to score 12 aces . Ilagan struck 8 aces . Butvilas won 83% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Ilagan won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Butvilas | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 40% | 36% |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Lithuanian broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Edas surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Andre broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Andre conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Butvilas | |||
| R1 Svajda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 68-59 | 68-59 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/61 | 30/61 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/31 | 20/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Ilagan | |||
| R1 Sun |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 77-68 | 77-68 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/78 | 43/78 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 29/43 | 29/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/35 | 17/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Tyler Challenger
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Colton SmithSmith (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Dane SweenySweeny (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Timo LegoutLegout – Andres AndradeAndrade (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Blake EllisEllis (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Bernard TomicTomic (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Braden ShickShick – Aidan MayoMayo (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Johannus MondayMonday (6-74 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Trevor SvajdaSvajda (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Aidan KimKim (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian GorznyGorzny – Andrew FentyFenty (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Fajing SunSun (6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Tung-Lin WuWu (4-6 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Karl PolingPoling – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Landon ArdilaArdila – Tyler ZinkZink (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Tung-Lin WuWu (4-6 7-6(4) 6-1) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Blake EllisEllis (7-6(5) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Aidan KimKim (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian GorznyGorzny – Andrew FentyFenty (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Braden ShickShick – Aidan MayoMayo (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Colton SmithSmith (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Bernard TomicTomic (7-6(4) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Johannus MondayMonday (6-7(4) 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Karl PolingPoling – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Dane SweenySweeny (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – (0-0) – H2H and prediction







