Matej Dodig and Guy Den Ouden will square off in the 2nd round of the Bad Rappenau Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:30 am on HÖRTKORN CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Guy Den Ouden who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Guy Den Ouden is the pick to win this match.
Guy Den Ouden -> 1.666
Matej Dodig -> 2.05
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Matej Dodig vs. Guy Den Ouden
There is no head to head record between Matej Dodig and Guy Den Ouden since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Matej Dodig
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 31-20 | 0-4 | 25-11 | 5-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 36-32 | 0-0 | 24-22 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-26 | 14-5 | 30-20 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-16 | 1-2 | 38-12 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 201, Dodig reached the 2nd round after defeating Joel Schwaerzler 6-4 2-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Dodig defeated Schwaerzler (6-4 2-6 6-4).During the match, Dodig scored less points (1) than Schwaerzler. In fact, the world no. 201 won 86 points vs Schwaerzler’s. That means that Dodig was more focused during the important points. Dodig was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Dodig blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Matej Dodig lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Dodig put 54% of his first serves in, winning 71% (30/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (17/36) on the 2nd serve. Dodig broke Schwaerzler 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Dodig has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 62% of his matches (137-85). 7-4 on clay in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Dodig has an aggregate99-58 record in the last 4 years on clay.
Matej’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Lugano Challenger and the Zadar Challenger.
The Croatian has an overall 12-11 win-loss record in 2026, 7-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bad Rappenau Challenger
Dodig has never competed in this tournament before.
Guy Den Ouden
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 15-20 | 0-4 | 13-12 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 47-18 | 0-1 | 46-15 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-24 | 3-7 | 28-12 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-19 | 35-9 | 24-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 14-12 | 12-7 | 2-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 211, Den got to the 2nd round after beating Pavel Kotov 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Den had a good straight sets win against Kotov (6-2 6-1). During the match Den scored 58 points vs Kotov’s 38. Den was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Den recorded 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Guy Den Ouden lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Den put 59% of his first serves in, winning 66% (21/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the 2nd serve. Den broke Kotov 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Dutch has an overall 5-13 win-loss record in 2026, 3-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Dodig | Den |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 15 |
| Pts | 86-87 | 58-38 |
| Total Points | 173 | 96 |
| Winners | 30 | 21 |
| %Winners | 35% | 36% |
Both Dodig and Den played 1 match. At the moment, Matej Dodig conceded 1 set while Guy Den Ouden hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Dodig has played 1 set more than Den (3 vs 2). Therefore, Dodig played 13 games more than Den. The Croatian scored 30 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Guy bagged 21 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Dodig | Den |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 42/78 | 32/54 |
| %1st in | 54% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 21/32 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 14/22 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 64% |
Dodig made 6 aces . Den made 2 aces . Dodig won 71% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Den won 66% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Dodig | Den |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 38% | 56% |
| Conceded | 11 | 6 |
| Saved | 6 | 5 |
| % Saved | 55% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Matej broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Matej lost his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded. Den broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Dodig | |||
| R1 Schwaerzler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 86-87 | 86-87 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 42/78 | 42/78 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 30/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 17/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Den | |||
| R1 Kotov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 58-38 | 58-38 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 32/54 | 32/54 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 21/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 14/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Bad Rappenau Challenger
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Tom GentzschGentzsch (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus – Hugo DellienDellien (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Alex BarrenaBarrena (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Guy Den OudenDen Ouden – Pavel KotovKotov (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Max HoukesHoukes (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Alex BarrenaBarrena (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Tom GentzschGentzsch (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras (7-6(5) 7-5) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus – Hugo DellienDellien (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
