Maxime Janvier and Francesco Maestrelli will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Lyon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Francesco Maestrelli who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Francesco Maestrelli is the pick to win this match.
Francesco Maestrelli -> 1.68
Maxime Janvier -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Maxime Janvier vs. Francesco Maestrelli
There is no head to head record between Maxime Janvier and Francesco Maestrelli since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Maxime Janvier
23 - 40win/loss
247
170
WLLLWLLLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-40 | 2-13 | 9-15 | 9-11 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-36 | 12-9 | 10-16 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-36 | 3-8 | 13-18 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-36 | 4-6 | 10-16 | 8-13 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-20 | 3-3 | 5-10 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 247, the French player reached the qualifications after beating Hynek Barton 7-6(5) 6-4.
In the qualifications, Janvier had a good straight sets win against Barton (7-65 6-4). During the match, Janvier scored 69 points vs Barton’s 58. Maxime was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Janvier made 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Maxime Janvier was very efficient on serve to win 83% (35/42) of his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The French player was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Barton twice.
Janvier has a weak win-loss record in the last 10 years having won only 49% of his matches (318-325). 9-11 on indoor hard courts in 2024. . Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Janvier has an overall 80-91 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Janvier’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Balma.
Janvier has an aggregate 23-40 win-loss record in 2024, 9-11 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lyon Challenger
Janvier has never competed in this tournament before.
Francesco Maestrelli
33 - 34win/loss
306
149
WLWWLWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-34 | 11-7 | 21-23 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-38 | 9-10 | 16-24 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-24 | 5-4 | 34-12 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-18 | 8-3 | 18-12 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-5 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 306, the Italian reached the qualifications after beating Noah Karma 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Maestrelli had a good straight sets win against Karma (6-4 6-3). During the match Maestrelli scored 79 points vs Karma’s 64. The Italian was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Maestrelli struck 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Francesco Maestrelli lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Maestrelli put 67% of his first serves in, winning 62% (29/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. Maestrelli broke Karma 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Maestrelli’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Monastir.
The Italian has a composed 33-34 win-loss record in 2024, 1-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lyon Challenger
Maestrelli has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Janvier | Maestrelli |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 19 |
| Pts | 69-58 | 79-64 |
| Total Points | 127 | 143 |
| Winners | 35 | 29 |
| %Winners | 51% | 37% |
Both Janvier and Maestrelli played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Janvier and Maestrelli have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Janvier played 4 games more than Maestrelli. The French player scored 35 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Francesco made 29 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Janvier | Maestrelli |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 5 |
| 1st in | 42/63 | 47/70 |
| %1st in | 67% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 35/42 | 29/47 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 10/23 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 43% |
Janvier struck 7 aces . Maestrelli bagged 5 aces . Janvier won 83% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Maestrelli won 62% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Janvier | Maestrelli |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 100% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 10 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Janvier broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The French player lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Francesco broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Janvier | |||
| Q1 Barton |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 69-58 | 69-58 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/63 | 42/63 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 35/42 | 35/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Maestrelli | |||
| Q1 Karma |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 79-64 | 79-64 | |
| Total points | 143 | 143 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 47/70 | 47/70 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 29/47 | 29/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLWLLLLW
WLWWLWWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GautierGautier – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Maxime ChazalChazal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
