Jacob Fearnley and Emilio Nava will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Helsinki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacob Fearnley who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jacob Fearnley is the pick to win this match.
Jacob Fearnley -> 1.3
Emilio Nava -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jacob Fearnley vs. Emilio Nava
There is no head to head record between Jacob Fearnley and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jacob Fearnley
44 - 8win/loss
89
89
LWWLWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-9 | 10-2 | 0-0 | 26-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 94, the Brit reached the 2nd round after defeating Valentin Royer 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Royer (6-2 6-3). During the match, Fearnley scored 66 points vs Royer’s 49. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fearnley recorded 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jacob Fearnley conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Fearnley put 65% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Royer 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Fearnley has a fantastic record in the last 4 years having won 80% of his matches (72-18). 25-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Fearnley has an aggregate42-7 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he beat Charles Broom in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3 and the Lincoln Challenger where he defeated Chak Lam Coleman Wong in the final 6-4 6-2 and the Rennes Challenger where he overcame Quentin Halys in the final 0-6 7-6(5) 6-3 and the Orleans Challenger where he overcame Harold Mayot in the final 6-3 7-6(5).
The Brit has an aggregate 44-8 win-loss record in 2024, 25-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Helsinki Challenger
Jacob has never competed in this tournament before.
Emilio Nava
34 - 33win/loss
213
124
LWLWWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 200, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Alibek Kachmazov 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, Nava had a good straight sets win against Kachmazov (6-1 6-2). During the match Nava scored 53 points vs Kachmazov’s 26. Nava was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Nava scored 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (21/27) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Kachmazov 5 times.
Nava’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Lisbon Challenger.
Nava has an aggregate 34-33 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fearnley | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 |
| Pts | 66-49 | 53-26 |
| Total Points | 115 | 79 |
| Winners | 23 | 21 |
| %Winners | 35% | 40% |
Both Fearnley and Nava played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fearnley and Nava have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fearnley played 2 games more than Nava. The Brit scored 23 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Nava recorded 21 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fearnley | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 33/51 | 27/45 |
| %1st in | 65% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 21/27 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 11/18 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 61% |
Fearnley fired 3 aces . Nava scored 2 aces . Fearnley won 70% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fearnley | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 5/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 100% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Jacob broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Brit extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 4 break points. Emilio broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. Nava conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fearnley | |||
| R1 Royer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-49 | 66-49 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 33/51 | 33/51 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 23/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 13/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Nava | |||
| R1 Kachmazov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 53-26 | 53-26 | |
| Total points | 79 | 79 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 27/45 | 27/45 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWLW
LWLWWWLLWL Tennis Scores in Helsinki Challenger
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Alexis GautierGautier (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Sandro KoppKopp (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KaukovaltaKaukovalta – Oskari PaldaniusPaldanius (6-3 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Oliver OjakaarOjakaar (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Alexis GautierGautier (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Patrick KaukovaltaKaukovalta – Oskari PaldaniusPaldanius (6-3 4-6 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Sandro KoppKopp (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
