Raphael Collignon and Emilio Nava will square off in the 2nd round of the Bratislava 2 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:30 am on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Raphael Collignon who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Raphael Collignon is the pick to win this match.
Raphael Collignon -> 1.533
Emilio Nava -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Raphael Collignon vs. Emilio Nava
This will be the 2nd time that Raphael Collignon and Emilio Nava face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Collignon (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Collignon won 6-3 6-2 in the 2nd round in the Roseto Degli Abruzzi Challenger back in 2023.
Raphael Collignon
64 - 21win/loss
167
164
WWWLLLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 64-21 | 5-3 | 46-8 | 13-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-16 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 61-22 | 14-4 | 38-12 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-20 | 11-11 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-6 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 167, Raphael reached the 2nd round after beating Jelle Sels 6-4 6-2, Adrian Andreev 6-4 7-5 and Hamad Medjedovic 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Belgian defeated Medjedovic (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match, Collignon scored 84 points vs Medjedovic’s 65. The Belgian was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Collignon fired 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Raphael Collignon was very efficient on serve to win 82% (36/44) of his 1st serve and 77% (20/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Raphael broke Medjedovic twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Collignon has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 66% of his matches (168-85). 13-10 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Collignon has a compiled30-26 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Luedenscheid Challenger where he defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp in the final 3-6 6-4 6-3.
The Belgian has an aggregate 64-21 win-loss record in 2024, 13-10 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 2 Challenger
Emilio Nava
33 - 32win/loss
204
124
WWWLLWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-32 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 7-3 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 204, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Petr Brunclik 6-4 2-6 6-3, Valentin Royer 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 and Damir Dzumhur 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Nava had a good straight sets win against Dzumhur (6-3 6-2). During the match Nava scored 65 points vs Dzumhur’s 47. Emilio was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Nava struck 12 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Emilio Nava was quite efficient on serve to win 86% (25/29) of his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nava broke Dzumhur 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Nava’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Lisbon Challenger.
The American has a composed 33-32 win-loss record in 2024, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Collignon | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 67 | 75 |
| Pts | 218-166 | 244-214 |
| Total Points | 384 | 458 |
| Winners | 91 | 101 |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% |
Both Collignon and Nava played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Raphael Collignon lost 1 set, while Emilio Nava surrendered 2 sets. Collignon has played 1 set(s) less than Nava (7 vs 8). Therefore, Collignon played 8 games less than Nava. The Belgian scored 91 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Emilio fired 101 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Collignon | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 38 |
| Avg per match | 5.3 | 12.7 |
| 1st in | 122/189 | 134/233 |
| %1st in | 65% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 91/122 | 101/134 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 48/67 | 62/99 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 63% |
Collignon struck 16 aces (5.3 per match). Nava fired 38 aces (12.7 per match). Collignon won 75% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Collignon | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 9 |
| Converted | 9/15 | 9/22 |
| % Converted | 60% | 41% |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 40% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The Belgian broke his opponents 9 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Belgian dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Nava broke his opponents 9 times with a 41% conversion rate. Emilio conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Collignon | |||||
| Q1 Sels |
Q3 Andreev |
R1 Medjedovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 22 | 27 | 67 | |
| pts | 62-38 | 72-63 | 84-65 | 218-166 | |
| Total points | 100 | 135 | 149 | 384 | |
| Winners | 25 | 30 | 36 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 42% | 43% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 8 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 32/45 | 46/74 | 44/70 | 122/189 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 62% | 63% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 30/46 | 36/44 | 91/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 65% | 82% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/13 | 16/28 | 20/26 | 48/67 | |
| % 2nd pts | 92% | 57% | 77% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 4/8 | 2/3 | 9/15 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 50% | 67% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | 33% | 50% | 28% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Nava | |||||
| Q1 Brunclik |
Q3 Royer |
R1 Dzumhur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | 6-74 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 31 | 17 | 75 | |
| pts | 83-84 | 96-83 | 65-47 | 244-214 | |
| Total points | 167 | 179 | 112 | 458 | |
| Winners | 32 | 44 | 25 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 46% | 38% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | 12 | 38 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 45/82 | 60/94 | 29/57 | 134/233 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 64% | 51% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 32/45 | 44/60 | 25/29 | 101/134 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 73% | 86% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/37 | 23/34 | 16/28 | 62/99 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 68% | 57% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 4/4 | 3/8 | 9/22 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 100% | 38% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/1 | 2/2 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLLLLWWW
WWWLLWLLWL Tennis Scores in Bratislava 2 Challenger
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (3-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
