Zsombor Piros and Egor Gerasimov will square off in the qualifications of the Bratislava 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zsombor Piros who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zsombor Piros is the pick to win this match.
Zsombor Piros -> 1.615
Egor Gerasimov -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zsombor Piros vs. Egor Gerasimov
This will be the 3rd time that Zsombor Piros and Egor Gerasimov clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Piros and Gerasimov (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Piros won 6-4 6-4 in the qualifications in at the French Open back in 2022.
Zsombor Piros
30 - 27win/loss
244
106
LLWWLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-29 | 1-6 | 17-17 | 13-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-29 | 3-2 | 35-18 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 7-6 | 19-9 | 10-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-16 | 3-2 | 31-9 | 13-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-2 | 1-1 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 242, Piros got to the qualifications after defeating Dennis Novak 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Zsombor had a good straight sets win against Novak (6-2 6-4). During the match, Piros scored 68 points vs Novak’s 53. The Hungarian was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Piros scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Zsombor Piros was very effective on serve to win 71% (25/35) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Piros broke Novak 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Piros has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (262-161). 12-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Piros has an overall43-28 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Cherbourg Challenger where he overcame Matteo Martineau in the final 6-3 6-4.
Piros has an aggregate 30-27 win-loss record in 2024, 12-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 2 Challenger
Egor Gerasimov
29 - 30win/loss
332
65
LLWLWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-32 | 16-17 | 0-3 | 13-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-25 | 18-15 | 1-3 | 7-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-16 | 8-10 | 7-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-32 | 5-10 | 2-8 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-15 | 6-6 | 1-3 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 336, Egor reached the qualifications after beating Jan Choinski 6-3 7-6(4).
In the qualifications, Gerasimov had a good straight sets win against Choinski (6-3 7-64). During the match Gerasimov scored 76 points vs Choinski’s 64. Egor was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Gerasimov made 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Egor Gerasimov lost the serve once. Furthermore, Gerasimov put 69% of his first serves in, winning 82% (40/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (9/22) on the 2nd serve. Egor broke Choinski twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Gerasimov’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Wuxi Challenger.
The Belarussian has a compiled 29-30 win-loss record in 2024, 13-10 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 2 Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2015. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Piros | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 22 |
| Pts | 68-53 | 76-64 |
| Total Points | 121 | 140 |
| Winners | 25 | 40 |
| %Winners | 37% | 53% |
Both Piros and Gerasimov played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Piros and Gerasimov have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Piros played 4 games less than Gerasimov. Zsombor scored 25 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Gerasimov blasted 40 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Piros | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 11 |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 49/71 |
| %1st in | 58% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 25/35 | 40/49 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 9/22 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 41% |
Piros fired 1 ace . Gerasimov also fired 11 aces . Piros won 71% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Gerasimov won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Piros | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 44% | 40% |
| Conceded | 5 | 1 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 80% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Zsombor broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Piros surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Gerasimov broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Belarussian conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Piros | |||
| Q1 Novak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 68-53 | 68-53 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 35/60 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 25/35 | 25/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gerasimov | |||
| Q1 Choinski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 76-64 | 76-64 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 49/71 | 49/71 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 40/49 | 40/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/22 | 9/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWLW
LLWLWLLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Zsombor PirosPiros (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Laslo DjereDjere (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Lukas KleinKlein (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
