Denis Kudla and Borna Gojo will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Sioux Falls Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Borna Gojo is the pick to win this match.
Borna Gojo -> 1.63
Denis Kudla -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Denis Kudla vs. Borna Gojo
There is no head to head record between Denis Kudla and Borna Gojo since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Denis Kudla
23 - 21win/loss
217
53
LWLWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-21 | 9-7 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-28 | 13-17 | 1-3 | 11-4 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-33 | 21-19 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 7-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-27 | 20-14 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 12-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-9 | 13-6 | 0-1 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 222, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Bor Artnak 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, Kudla had a good straight sets win against Artnak (6-2 6-4). During the match, Kudla scored 63 points vs Artnak’s 44. Kudla was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kudla recorded 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Denis Kudla was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (25/32) of his 1st serve and 75% (12/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Denis broke Artnak 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Kudla has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (326-268). 7-4 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kudla has a compiled 68-43 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Denis’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Cleveland Challenger and the San Luis Potosi Challenger.
Kudla has an aggregate 23-20 win-loss record in 2024, 7-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sioux Falls Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Borna Gojo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-22 | 8-7 | 3-6 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 23-14 | 11-6 | 10-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 422, the Croatian got to the 2nd round after beating Rudy Quan 4-6 6-1 6-1, Strong Kirchheimer 6-2 6-1 and Mitchell Krueger 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Gojo had a good straight sets win against Krueger (6-3 6-2). During the match Gojo scored 63 points vs Krueger’s 44. Gojo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Gojo recorded 13 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Borna Gojo lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Gojo put 66% of his first serves in, winning 79% (30/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (8/20) on the 2nd serve. Gojo broke Krueger 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Borna has an overall 6-8 win-loss record in 2024, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kudla | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 56 |
| Pts | 63-44 | 207-137 |
| Total Points | 107 | 344 |
| Winners | 25 | 78 |
| %Winners | 40% | 38% |
Kudla played 1 match while Gojo competed in 3 matches. Gojo started his run from the qualifications while Kudla had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Borna Gojo lost 1 set while Denis Kudla hasn’t dropped a set so far. Kudla has played 5 set(s) less than Gojo (2 vs 7). Therefore, Kudla played 38 games less than Gojo. Denis scored 25 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Borna fired 78 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kudla | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 28 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 9.3 |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 106/168 |
| %1st in | 67% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 78/106 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 35/62 |
| %2nd pts | 75% | 56% |
Kudla scored 12 aces . Gojo recorded 28 aces (9.3 per match). Kudla won 78% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kudla | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 15 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 15/27 |
| % Converted | 50% | 56% |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 50% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Kudla broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Denis lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Croatian broke his opponents 15 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Croatian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kudla | |||
| R1 Artnak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 63-44 | 63-44 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 25/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 12/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gojo | |||||
| Q1 Quan |
Q3 Kirchheimer |
R1 Krueger |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | 6-2 6-1 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 15 | 17 | 56 | |
| pts | 83-55 | 61-38 | 63-44 | 207-137 | |
| Total points | 138 | 99 | 107 | 344 | |
| Winners | 27 | 21 | 30 | 78 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 34% | 48% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 9 | 13 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 37/60 | 31/50 | 38/58 | 106/168 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | 66% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 21/31 | 30/38 | 78/106 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 68% | 79% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 12/19 | 8/20 | 35/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 63% | 40% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 5/7 | 4/5 | 15/27 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 71% | 80% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 4/5 | 1/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 80% | 50% | 130% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLW
WWWWWWWLLW Tennis Scores in Sioux Falls Challenger
- Govind NandaNanda – Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Omni KumarKumar (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Andres MartinMartin (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Martin BorisioukBorisiouk (1-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Keegan SmithSmith (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Matthew ForbesForbes (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-77 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Cooper WoestendickWoestendick (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (7-63 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Martin DammDamm (5-7 7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-3 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Ozan BarisBaris – Alastair GrayGray (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
