Maxime Chazal and Jakub Paul will face off in the qualifications of the St. Brieuc Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT STEREDENN. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Paul who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jakub Paul is the pick to win this match.
Jakub Paul -> 1.86
Maxime Chazal -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Maxime Chazal vs. Jakub Paul
There is no head to head record between Maxime Chazal and Jakub Paul since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Maxime Chazal
39 - 21win/loss
362
234
WLLLWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-21 | 0-3 | 38-16 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-29 | 13-10 | 31-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-27 | 3-2 | 35-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 362, Chazal got to the qualifications after defeating Lucas Bouquet 6-3 7-6(6).
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Bouquet (6-3 7-66). During the match, Chazal scored 70 points vs Bouquet’s 60. Maxime was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Chazal fired 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Maxime Chazal lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Chazal put 62% of his first serves in, winning 88% (35/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (10/25) on the 2nd serve. Chazal broke Bouquet 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Chazal has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (370-226). 1-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Chazal has a compiled 1-8 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Chazal’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Dubrovnik,M25 Carnac,M25 Grasse,M25 Montauban,M25 Uriage and M25 Wetzlar.
The French player has a composed 39-21 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the St. Brieuc Challenger
Jakub Paul
34 - 22win/loss
417
417
WLWLWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-22 | 11-7 | 17-11 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 9-10 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 417 (career-high), the Swiss got to the qualifications after beating Liam Broady 7-6(7) 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Broady (7-67 6-1). During the match Paul scored 68 points vs Broady’s 57. Jakub was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Paul made 4 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Jakub Paul was quite effective on serve to win 72% (31/43) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Swiss broke Broady 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Jakub’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Sarajevo and M25 Sion.
Jakub has an aggregate 34-22 win-loss record in 2024, 6-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chazal | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 20 |
| Pts | 70-60 | 68-57 |
| Total Points | 130 | 125 |
| Winners | 35 | 31 |
| %Winners | 50% | 46% |
Both Chazal and Paul played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Chazal and Paul have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Chazal played 2 games more than Paul. Maxime scored 35 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, Paul scored 31 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chazal | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 40/65 | 43/67 |
| %1st in | 62% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 35/40 | 31/43 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 10/25 | 14/24 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 58% |
Chazal recorded 3 aces . Paul managed to score 4 aces . Chazal won 88% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Paul won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chazal | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 75% | 60% |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 80% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Chazal broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Chazal lost his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Jakub broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chazal | |||
| Q1 Bouquet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 70-60 | 70-60 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 40/65 | 40/65 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 35/40 | 35/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/25 | 10/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Paul | |||
| Q1 Broady |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 68-57 | 68-57 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 43/67 | 43/67 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 31/43 | 31/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLWLWWLW
WLWLWWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Richard BerankisBerankis (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Bogdan PavelPavel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolay VylegzhaninVylegzhanin – Lucas PoullainPoullain (0-1) – H2H and prediction
