Nino Serdarusic and Cem Ilkel will face off in the qualifications of the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nino Serdarusic who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nino Serdarusic is the pick to win this match.
Nino Serdarusic -> 1.37
Cem Ilkel -> 2.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nino Serdarusic vs. Cem Ilkel
This will be the 5th time that Nino Serdarusic and Cem Ilkel square off. The head to head is 3-1 for Ilkel (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Ilkel won 6-2 6-4 in the 1st round in the Vilnius Challenger back in 2023.
Nino Serdarusic
20 - 22win/loss
582
167
LLLWLWLLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-24 | 1-2 | 19-21 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-33 | 0-4 | 26-23 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-34 | 6-6 | 17-20 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-33 | 0-0 | 23-25 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-14 | 3-2 | 6-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 450, Serdarusic got to the qualifications after beating Lucas Miedler 6-3 7-6(3).
In the qualifications, Nino had a good straight sets win against Miedler (6-3 7-63). During the match, Serdarusic scored 79 points vs Miedler’s 68. Serdarusic was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Regarding the service games, Serdarusic bagged 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Nino Serdarusic lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Serdarusic put 79% of his first serves in, winning 68% (43/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the 2nd serve. Serdarusic broke Miedler twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Serdarusic has winning record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (348-291). 19-18 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Serdarusic has a compiled 298-209 match record in the last years on clay.
Serdarusic’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Nino has an overall 20-21 win-loss record in 2024, 19-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Nino has never competed in this tournament before.
Cem Ilkel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-26 | 7-12 | 4-7 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-29 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-16 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-29 | 17-9 | 13-11 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 2-3 | 1-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 475, Ilkel got to the qualifications after defeating Martin Klizan 7-6(4) ret..
In the qualifications against Klizan, Cem had a free pass after Klizan retired on a 7-64 . scoreline.
Ilkel has an overall 13-20 win-loss record in 2024, 2-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Serdarusic | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 13 |
| Pts | 79-68 | 49-48 |
| Total Points | 147 | 97 |
| Winners | 43 | 15 |
| %Winners | 54% | 31% |
Both Serdarusic and Ilkel played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Serdarusic and Ilkel have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Serdarusic played 9 games more than Ilkel. Serdarusic scored 43 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, Cem blasted 15 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Serdarusic | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 63/80 | 30/41 |
| %1st in | 79% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 43/63 | 15/30 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 50% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 7/11 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 64% |
Serdarusic scored 6 aces . Ilkel scored 2 aces . Serdarusic won 68% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 50% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Serdarusic | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 29% | 30% |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 80% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Serdarusic broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Serdarusic surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Turk broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Ilkel conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Serdarusic | |||
| Q1 Miedler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 79-68 | 79-68 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 63/80 | 63/80 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 43/63 | 43/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Ilkel | |||
| Q1 Klizan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 1 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 49-48 | 49-48 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 30/41 | 30/41 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 15/30 | 15/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 50% | 50% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWLLLW
LLWLLWLLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David PichlerPichler – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Sandro KoppKopp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Tim HandelHandel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
