![Prediction And Head To Head Vit Kopriva Vs. Sebastian Fanselow Tba43hgmla Prediction and head to head Vit Kopriva vs. Sebastian Fanselow](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Vit-Kopriva-vs.-Sebastian-Fanselow-TBa43HGmlA.jpg)
Vit Kopriva and Sebastian Fanselow will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Szczecin Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vit Kopriva who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Vit Kopriva is the pick to win this match.
Vit Kopriva -> 1.12
Sebastian Fanselow -> 5.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vit Kopriva vs. Sebastian Fanselow
There is no head to head record between Vit Kopriva and Sebastian Fanselow since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Vit Kopriva
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Vit Kopriva](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/7833Vit-Kopriva.jpg)
27 - 22win/loss
143
111
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 27-22 | 13-9 | 9-11 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 35-27 | 1-4 | 34-21 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-28 | 7-5 | 30-18 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-26 | 1-3 | 32-21 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 24-15 | 0-0 | 17-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 143, Kopriva reached the 2nd round after beating Nicolas Moreno De Alboran 2-6 7-5 6-1.
In the 1st round against Moreno De Alboran, Kopriva recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-5 6-1). During the match, Kopriva scored 74 points vs Moreno De Alboran’s 68. Kopriva was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kopriva fired 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Vit Kopriva was very effective on serve to win 73% (33/45) of his 1st serve and 74% (17/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Czech broke Moreno De Alboran 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Kopriva has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (334-235). 9-11 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kopriva has a composed244-161 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Kopriva’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger.
Kopriva has an overall 27-22 win-loss record in 2024, 9-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Sebastian Fanselow
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Sebastian Fanselow](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/8394Sebastian-Fanselow.jpg)
25 - 29win/loss
331
273
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-29 | 7-9 | 10-14 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 56-31 | 24-9 | 20-15 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-31 | 5-11 | 17-13 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 35-28 | 17-13 | 13-11 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 34-15 | 34-13 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 331, Sebastian reached the 2nd round after defeating Andrej Martin 4-6 6-4 6-1 and Andrew Paulson 6-3 ret..
In the 1st round against Paulson, the German had a free pass after Paulson retired on a 6-3 . scoreline.
The German’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Trnava.
Sebastian has an aggregate 25-29 win-loss record in 2024, 10-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Sebastian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kopriva | Fanselow |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 3 | 5 |
Tot Games | 27 | 36 |
Pts | 74-68 | 123-105 |
Total Points | 142 | 228 |
Winners | 33 | 58 |
%Winners | 45% | 47% |
Kopriva played 1 match while Fanselow competed in 2 matches. Fanselow started his run from the qualifications while Kopriva had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Vit Kopriva surrendered 1 set, while Sebastian Fanselow surrendered 1 set. Kopriva has played 2 set(s) less than Fanselow (3 vs 5). Therefore, Kopriva played 9 games less than Fanselow. Kopriva scored 33 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Fanselow managed to score 58 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kopriva | Fanselow |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 4 |
Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
1st in | 45/68 | 80/126 |
%1st in | 66% | 63% |
1st pts | 33/45 | 58/80 |
%1st pts | 73% | 73% |
2nd pts | 17/23 | 24/46 |
%2nd pts | 74% | 52% |
Kopriva managed to score 2 aces . Fanselow recorded 4 aces (2 per match). Kopriva won 73% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Fanselow won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kopriva | Fanselow |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 5 |
Converted | 3/7 | 5/9 |
% Converted | 43% | 56% |
Conceded | 2 | 11 |
Saved | 0 | 9 |
% Saved | 0% | 82% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kopriva broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Vit surrendered his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Sebastian broke his opponents 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Fanselow conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
Kopriva | |||
R1 Moreno De Alboran |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 74-68 | 74-68 | |
Total points | 142 | 142 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 45/68 | 45/68 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 33/45 | 33/45 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 17/23 | 17/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Fanselow | |||||
Q1 Martin |
Q3 Vatutin |
R1 Paulson |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | 6-3 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | 9 | 63 | |
pts | 90-79 | – | 33-26 | 123-105 | |
Total points | 169 | 0 | 59 | 228 | |
Winners | 43 | 15 | 58 | ||
%Winners | 48% | 0% | 45% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||
1st in | 58/89 | / | 22/37 | 80/126 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 0% | 59% | 63% | |
1st pts | 43/58 | / | 15/22 | 58/80 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 0% | 68% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 15/31 | / | 9/15 | 24/46 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 0% | 60% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 1 | 5 | ||
Converted | 4/8 | / | 1/1 | 5/9 | |
Converted % | 50% | 0% | 100% | 56% | |
Conceded | 7 | 4 | 11 | ||
Saved | 5/7 | 0/ | 4/4 | 9 | |
Saved % | 71% | – | 100% | 171% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Szczecin Challenger
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (6-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (6-3 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Hynek BartonBarton (4-6 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Szymon Kielan/Filip PieczonkaKielan/Filip Pieczonka – Marco Bortolotti/Sergio Martos GornesBortolotti/Sergio Martos Gornes (2-6 7-5 10-8) – See score progression
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (3-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Guido Andreozzi/Theo ArribageAndreozzi/Theo Arribage – Daniel Altmaier/Luis David MartinezAltmaier/Luis David Martinez (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Lucas GerchGerch (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (6-2 7-66) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Tomasz BerkietaBerkieta (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Pedro CachinCachin (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (2-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Federico CoriaCoria (0-1) – H2H and prediction