![Prediction And Head To Head Daniel Altmaier Vs. Adrian Andreev Crpwlykh4w Prediction and head to head Daniel Altmaier vs. Adrian Andreev](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Daniel-Altmaier-vs.-Adrian-Andreev-cRPWLykh4w.jpg)
Daniel Altmaier and Adrian Andreev will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Szczecin Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:30 pm on COURT BOHDAN TOMASZEWSKI. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Altmaier who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Altmaier is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Altmaier -> 1.333
Adrian Andreev -> 3.125
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Altmaier vs. Adrian Andreev
There is no head to head record between Daniel Altmaier and Adrian Andreev since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Daniel Altmaier
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Daniel Altmaier](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Daniel-Altmaier.jpg)
24 - 28win/loss
84
47
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-28 | 5-9 | 18-18 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-31 | 8-13 | 21-10 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-31 | 10-14 | 22-12 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 49-27 | 7-3 | 36-20 | 5-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 28-16 | 12-7 | 13-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 84, Altmaier got to the 2nd round after beating Daniel Michalski 7-6(3) 6-2.
In the 1st round, Altmaier had a good straight sets win against Michalski (7-63 6-2). During the match, Altmaier scored 89 points vs Michalski’s 68. Daniel was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Altmaier managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniel Altmaier lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Altmaier put 58% of his first serves in, winning 68% (28/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the 2nd serve. Altmaier broke Michalski 5 times after converting 31% of his break points (5/16).
Altmaier has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (358-234). 18-18 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Altmaier has an aggregate 175-113 match record in the last years on clay.
Daniel’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Sassuolo Challenger and the Seville Challenger.
Daniel has a compiled 24-28 win-loss record in 2024, 18-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
Adrian Andreev
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Adrian Andreev](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/7842Adrian-Andreev.jpg)
34 - 23win/loss
203
183
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-23 | 7-4 | 24-13 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-29 | 7-7 | 16-16 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2022 | 49-29 | 7-7 | 29-15 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-22 | 6-7 | 20-9 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 22-8 | 10-2 | 12-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 203, the Bulgarian got to the 2nd round after defeating Lucas Gerch 3-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Gerch, Andreev recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Andreev scored 102 points vs Gerch’s 92. The Bulgarian was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Andreev recorded 2 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Adrian Andreev lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Andreev put 57% of his first serves in, winning 65% (34/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (24/39) on the 2nd serve. Adrian broke Gerch 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Porto 2 Challenger where he beat Carlos Taberner in the final 6-3 6-0.
Adrian has an aggregate 34-23 win-loss record in 2024, 24-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Altmaier | Andreev |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 21 | 28 |
Pts | 89-68 | 102-92 |
Total Points | 157 | 194 |
Winners | 28 | 34 |
%Winners | 31% | 33% |
Both Altmaier and Andreev played 1 match. At the moment, Adrian Andreev dropped 1 set while Daniel Altmaier hasn’t conceded a set so far. Altmaier has played 1 set(s) less than Andreev (2 vs 3). Therefore, Altmaier played 7 games less than Andreev. The German scored 28 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Andreev blasted 34 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Altmaier | Andreev |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 2 |
Avg per match | 5 | 2 |
1st in | 41/71 | 52/91 |
%1st in | 58% | 57% |
1st pts | 28/41 | 34/52 |
%1st pts | 68% | 65% |
2nd pts | 17/30 | 24/39 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 62% |
Altmaier recorded 5 aces . Andreev made 2 aces . Altmaier won 68% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Andreev won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Altmaier | Andreev |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 4 |
Converted | 5/16 | 4/10 |
% Converted | 31% | 40% |
Conceded | 7 | 10 |
Saved | 4 | 7 |
% Saved | 57% | 70% |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Daniel broke his opponent 5 times with a 31% conversion rate. Altmaier conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Andreev broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Adrian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
Altmaier | |||
R1 Michalski |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-63 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 89-68 | 89-68 | |
Total points | 157 | 157 | |
Winners | 28 | 28 | |
%Winners | 31% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 41/71 | 41/71 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 28/41 | 28/41 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 17/30 | 17/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/16 | 5/16 | |
Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Andreev | |||
R1 Gerch |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
pts | 102-92 | 102-92 | |
Total points | 194 | 194 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 52/91 | 52/91 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 34/52 | 34/52 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 24/39 | 24/39 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 7/10 | 7 | |
Saved % | 70% | 70% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Szczecin Challenger
- Gianluca MagerMager – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (6-3 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Hynek BartonBarton (4-6 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Szymon Kielan/Filip PieczonkaKielan/Filip Pieczonka – Marco Bortolotti/Sergio Martos GornesBortolotti/Sergio Martos Gornes (2-6 7-5 10-8) – See score progression
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (3-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Guido Andreozzi/Theo ArribageAndreozzi/Theo Arribage – Daniel Altmaier/Luis David MartinezAltmaier/Luis David Martinez (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Lucas GerchGerch (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (6-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Pedro CachinCachin (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (2-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (6-2 7-66) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Tomasz BerkietaBerkieta (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Federico CoriaCoria (0-1) – H2H and prediction