Yasutaka Uchiyama and Mark Lajal will fight against each other in the final of the Zhangjiagang Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mark Lajal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mark Lajal is the pick to win this match.
Mark Lajal -> 1.69
Yasutaka Uchiyama -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yasutaka Uchiyama vs. Mark Lajal
This will be the 2nd time that Yasutaka Uchiyama and Mark Lajal clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Lajal (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Lajal won 4-6 6-2 6-2 in the 2nd round in the Chicago Challenger back in 2023.
Yasutaka Uchiyama
24 - 15win/loss
197
78
WWWWLLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-15 | 20-11 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-24 | 27-22 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-21 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-26 | 9-13 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 197, the Japanese reached the final after defeating Yuta Shimizu 6-2 1-0 ret., Vadym Ursu 6-2 6-1, Tung-Lin Wu 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 and Seong Chan Hong 6-3 6-7(6) 4-0 ret..
In the semifinal against Chan Hong, the Japanese had a free pass after Chan Hong retired on a 6-3 6-76 4-0 . scoreline.
Uchiyama has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (269-224). 20-11 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Uchiyama has an overall 197-143 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Busan Challenger where he overcame Seong Chan Hong in the final 7-6(4) 6-3.
The Japanese has a composed 24-15 win-loss record in 2024, 20-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zhangjiagang Challenger
Mark Lajal
24 - 20win/loss
247
191
WWWWLWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-20 | 17-11 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 247, Mark reached the final after defeating Philip Henning 4-6 7-5 7-6(5), Ryan Peniston 6-2 6-2, Rio Noguchi 6-4 6-2 and Norbert Gombos 6-3 6-4.
In the semifinal, Lajal had a good straight sets win against Gombos (6-3 6-4). During the match Lajal scored 71 points vs Gombos’s 62. The Estonian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Lajal struck 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Mark Lajal lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Lajal put 65% of his first serves in, winning 77% (36/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (9/25) on the 2nd serve. Mark broke Gombos 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mark has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The Estonian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Shenzhen 1 Challenger and the Zhangjiagang Challenger.
The Estonian has a compiled 24-20 win-loss record in 2024, 17-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zhangjiagang Challenger
Mark has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Uchiyama | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 12 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 82 | 88 |
| Pts | 256-195 | 301-250 |
| Total Points | 451 | 551 |
| Winners | 112 | 139 |
| %Winners | 44% | 46% |
Both Uchiyama and Lajal played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Yasutaka Uchiyama conceded 2 sets, while Mark Lajal dropped 1 set. Uchiyama has played 3 sets more than Lajal (12 vs 9). However, it’s interesting to notice that Uchiyama played 6 games less than Lajal. Uchiyama scored 112 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Lajal recorded 139 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Uchiyama | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 23 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 138/224 | 168/268 |
| %1st in | 62% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 112/138 | 139/168 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 49/86 | 49/100 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 49% |
Uchiyama scored 23 aces (5.8 per match). Lajal blasted 25 aces (6.3 per match). Uchiyama won 81% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Lajal won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Uchiyama | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 13 |
| Converted | 11/22 | 13/31 |
| % Converted | 50% | 42% |
| Conceded | 9 | 15 |
| Saved | 7 | 11 |
| % Saved | 78% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The Japanese broke his opponents 11 times with a 50% conversion rate. Uchiyama dropped his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Lajal broke his opponents 13 times with a 42% conversion rate. Mark conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Uchiyama | ||||||
| R1 Shimizu |
R2 Ursu |
1/4 Wu |
1/2 Chan Hong |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 1-0 ret. | 6-2 6-1 | 6-75 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-76 4-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 9 | 15 | 32 | 26 | 82 | |
| pts | – | 61-38 | 104-87 | 91-70 | 256-195 | |
| Total points | 0 | 99 | 191 | 161 | 451 | |
| Winners | 27 | 45 | 40 | 112 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 44% | 43% | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 0 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | ||
| 1st in | / | 32/55 | 57/92 | 49/77 | 138/224 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 58% | 62% | 64% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | / | 27/32 | 45/57 | 40/49 | 112/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | 84% | 79% | 82% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 11/23 | 22/35 | 16/28 | 49/86 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 48% | 63% | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | ||
| Converted | / | 4/5 | 3/11 | 4/6 | 11/22 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 80% | 27% | 67% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 3/3 | 3/4 | 1/2 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 75% | 50% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Lajal | ||||||
| R1 Henning |
R2 Peniston |
1/4 Noguchi |
1/2 Gombos |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 7-65 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 88 | |
| pts | 106-105 | 61-40 | 63-43 | 71-62 | 301-250 | |
| Total points | 211 | 101 | 106 | 133 | 551 | |
| Winners | 52 | 26 | 25 | 36 | 139 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 43% | 40% | 51% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 15 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 64/98 | 29/52 | 28/46 | 47/72 | 168/268 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 56% | 61% | 65% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 52/64 | 26/29 | 25/28 | 36/47 | 139/168 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 90% | 89% | 77% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/34 | 11/23 | 12/18 | 9/25 | 49/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 48% | 67% | 36% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 4/9 | 3/8 | 3/5 | 13/31 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 44% | 38% | 60% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 15 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 7/8 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 100% | – | 88% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWLLLWWW
WWWWLWLWWL 
