Facundo Bagnis and Facundo Mena will face off in the quarter of the Bogota Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 10:00 am on CAMPO CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Facundo Bagnis who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Facundo Bagnis is the pick to win this match.
Facundo Bagnis -> 1.29
Facundo Mena -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Facundo Bagnis vs. Facundo Mena
This will be the 3rd time that Facundo Bagnis and Facundo Mena face off. The head to head is 1-1 for Bagnis and Mena (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Bagnis won 6-3 6-0 in the final in the Pereira Challenger back in 2022.
Facundo Bagnis
30 - 13win/loss
138
55
WWLLWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-13 | 1-2 | 29-10 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-27 | 4-6 | 23-20 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-29 | 9-9 | 37-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-23 | 2-5 | 35-16 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-14 | 1-2 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 138, Bagnis reached the quarter after defeating Kiranpal Pannu 6-4 6-4 and Pedro Sakamoto 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Facundo had a good straight sets win against Sakamoto (6-4 6-2). During the match, Bagnis scored 58 points vs Sakamoto’s 42. Bagnis was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bagnis struck 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Facundo Bagnis was very efficient on serve to win 89% (25/28) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Facundo broke Sakamoto 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Facundo hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to conquer 57% of the points he played.
Bagnis has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (368-238). 29-10 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Bagnis has a composed 342-190 record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Tigre Challenger where he overcame Mariano Navone in the final 7-5 1-6 7-5.
Facundo has an overall 30-13 win-loss record in 2024, 29-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bogota Challenger
Facundo Mena
45 - 19win/loss
243
127
WWLLWWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-19 | 3-1 | 42-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 11-9 | 18-11 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-29 | 8-7 | 25-20 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-30 | 0-4 | 29-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-11 | 0-2 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 243, the Argentine got to the quarter after defeating Guido Ivan Justo 6-0 6-4 and Tomas Farjat 6-4 3-6 7-6(3).
In the 2nd round, The Argentine defeated Farjat (6-4 3-6 7-63). During the match Mena scored 105 points vs Farjat’s 103. Mena was quite aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Mena struck 4 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Facundo Mena lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Mena put 56% of his first serves in, winning 76% (47/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (22/49) on the 2nd serve. Facundo broke Farjat 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mena has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Mena’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Villa Maria,M15 Santiago,the Santa Fe Challenger,the Ibague Challenger and M25 Telfs.
Mena has an aggregate 45-19 win-loss record in 2024, 42-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bogota Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bagnis | Mena |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 38 | 48 |
| Pts | 130-97 | 164-140 |
| Total Points | 227 | 304 |
| Winners | 53 | 65 |
| %Winners | 41% | 40% |
Both Bagnis and Mena played 2 matches. At the moment, Facundo Mena surrendered 1 set while Facundo Bagnis hasn’t lost a set so far. Bagnis has played 1 set(s) less than Mena (4 vs 5). Therefore, Bagnis played 10 games less than Mena. Facundo scored 53 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Argentine recorded 65 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bagnis | Mena |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 63/100 | 88/161 |
| %1st in | 63% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 53/63 | 65/88 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 26/37 | 39/73 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 53% |
Bagnis blasted 4 aces (2 per match). Mena fired 8 aces (4 per match). Bagnis won 84% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Mena won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bagnis | Mena |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 38% | 58% |
| Conceded | 1 | 11 |
| Saved | 1 | 8 |
| % Saved | 100% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Facundo broke his opponents 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Argentine quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Argentine broke his opponents 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Mena conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bagnis | ||||
| R1 Pannu |
R2 Sakamoto |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 18 | 38 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 58-42 | 130-97 | |
| Total points | 127 | 100 | 227 | |
| Winners | 28 | 25 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 35/51 | 28/49 | 63/100 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 57% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 25/28 | 53/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 89% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 13/21 | 26/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 62% | 70% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/9 | 3/4 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 22% | 75% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Mena | ||||
| R1 Ivan |
R2 Farjat |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-4 | 6-4 3-6 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 32 | 48 | |
| pts | 59-37 | 105-103 | 164-140 | |
| Total points | 96 | 208 | 304 | |
| Winners | 18 | 47 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 45% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 26/50 | 62/111 | 88/161 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 56% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 18/26 | 47/62 | 65/88 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 76% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/24 | 22/49 | 39/73 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 45% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/5 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 60% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 8/11 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 73% | 37% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWWLWLW
WWLLWWWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo MenaMena – Facundo BagnisBagnis (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Nicolas MejiaMejia (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Karue SellSell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
