![Prediction And Head To Head Harold Mayot Vs. Tristan Schoolkate Zsm8padzch Prediction and head to head Harold Mayot vs. Tristan Schoolkate](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Harold-Mayot-vs.-Tristan-Schoolkate-zsM8pAdZCh.jpg)
Harold Mayot and Tristan Schoolkate will square off in the 2nd round of the Lincoln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Harold Mayot who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Harold Mayot is the pick to win this match.
Harold Mayot -> 1.39
Tristan Schoolkate -> 2.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Harold Mayot vs. Tristan Schoolkate
There is no head to head record between Harold Mayot and Tristan Schoolkate since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Harold Mayot
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Harold Mayot](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Harold-Mayot.jpg)
32 - 25win/loss
112
108
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-25 | 12-8 | 11-9 | 4-4 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-29 | 11-9 | 9-13 | 7-5 | 4-1 | 0-1 |
2022 | 40-33 | 13-8 | 19-13 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2021 | 15-14 | 0-1 | 7-3 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2020 | 14-12 | 5-4 | 5-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 112, the French player got to the 2nd round after beating Mitchell Krueger 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Krueger (6-3 6-4). During the match, Mayot scored 66 points vs Krueger’s 54. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mayot struck 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Harold Mayot conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Mayot put 63% of his first serves in, winning 81% (35/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. Harold broke Krueger twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Mayot has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 55% of his matches (147-120). 12-8 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mayot has a compiled41-30 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Harold’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Barletta Challenger and the Ilkley Challenger.
The French player has a composed 32-25 win-loss record in 2024, 12-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Tristan Schoolkate
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Tristan Schoolkate](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/8440Tristan-Schoolkate.jpg)
29 - 21win/loss
202
176
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-21 | 23-14 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 202, Tristan reached the 2nd round after defeating Tristan Boyer 7-5 7-6(0).
In the 1st round, Schoolkate had a good straight sets win against Boyer (7-5 7-60). During the match Schoolkate scored 85 points vs Boyer’s 71. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Schoolkate managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Tristan Schoolkate was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (31/38) of his 1st serve and 59% (23/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Schoolkate broke Boyer twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Guangzhou Challenger where he defeated Adam Walton in the final 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Schoolkate has an aggregate 29-21 win-loss record in 2024, 23-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mayot | Schoolkate |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 25 |
Pts | 66-54 | 85-71 |
Total Points | 120 | 156 |
Winners | 35 | 31 |
%Winners | 53% | 36% |
Both Mayot and Schoolkate played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mayot and Schoolkate have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mayot played 6 games less than Schoolkate. Harold scored 35 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian scored 31 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mayot | Schoolkate |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 2 |
Avg per match | 8 | 2 |
1st in | 43/68 | 38/77 |
%1st in | 63% | 49% |
1st pts | 35/43 | 31/38 |
%1st pts | 81% | 82% |
2nd pts | 11/25 | 23/39 |
%2nd pts | 44% | 59% |
Mayot managed to score 8 aces . Schoolkate bagged 2 aces . Mayot won 81% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Schoolkate won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mayot | Schoolkate |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 2 |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/3 |
% Converted | 40% | 67% |
Conceded | 4 | 3 |
Saved | 4 | 2 |
% Saved | 100% | 67% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Harold broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Harold was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 4 break points. Schoolkate broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Schoolkate conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Mayot | |||
R1 Krueger |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 66-54 | 66-54 | |
Total points | 120 | 120 | |
Winners | 35 | 35 | |
%Winners | 53% | 53% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 43/68 | 43/68 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 35/43 | 35/43 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 11/25 | 11/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Schoolkate | |||
R1 Boyer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 7-60 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 85-71 | 85-71 | |
Total points | 156 | 156 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 38/77 | 38/77 | |
% 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 23/39 | 23/39 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Lincoln Challenger
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Stefan KozlovKozlov (2-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Borna GojoGojo (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Ozan BarisBaris – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Joshua LapadatLapadat (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Emilio NavaNava (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Tristan BoyerBoyer (7-5 7-60) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Joan Torres EspinosaTorres Espinosa (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Anton SheppShepp (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cooper WilliamsWilliams – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Joshua LapadatLapadat (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Stefan KozlovKozlov (2-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ozan BarisBaris – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction