Oriol Roca Batalla and Dalibor Svrcina will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Bonn Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 6:30 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Oriol Roca Batalla who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Oriol Roca Batalla is the pick to win this match.
Oriol Roca Batalla -> 1.63
Dalibor Svrcina -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Oriol Roca Batalla vs. Dalibor Svrcina
This will be the 3rd time that Oriol Roca Batalla and Dalibor Svrcina clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Roca Batalla and Svrcina (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Roca Batalla won 6-3 6-3 in the 1st round in the Prague Challenger back in May 2024.
Oriol Roca Batalla
26 - 24win/loss
156
154
WLWWLLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-24 | 5-6 | 21-16 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-38 | 8-4 | 42-34 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-26 | 0-0 | 50-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-21 | 0-1 | 25-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-10 | 0-1 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 156, the Spaniard reached the 2nd round after beating Sebastian Fanselow 6-0 6-1.
In the 1st round, Oriol had a good straight sets win against Fanselow (6-0 6-1). During the match, Roca Batalla scored 62 points vs Fanselow’s 34. Roca Batalla was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Roca Batalla couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Oriol Roca Batalla was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (19/25) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Roca Batalla broke Fanselow 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Roca Batalla has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (435-249). 21-16 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Roca Batalla has a composed 389-212 record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Tunis Challenger where he beat Valentin Royer in the final 7-6(5) 7-5.
The Spaniard has a composed 26-24 win-loss record in 2024, 21-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bonn Challenger
The Spaniard has never competed in this tournament before.
Dalibor Svrcina
16 - 18win/loss
315
154
WLLLLWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-18 | 6-5 | 8-11 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-31 | 7-10 | 24-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-24 | 8-9 | 18-14 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-17 | 8-3 | 25-13 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-10 | 6-3 | 3-5 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 315, Dalibor got to the 2nd round after defeating Tristan Lamasine 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Lamasine (6-3 6-3). During the match Svrcina scored 63 points vs Lamasine’s 51. The Czech was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Svrcina blasted 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Dalibor Svrcina lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Svrcina put 53% of his first serves in, winning 76% (26/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (12/30) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Lamasine 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
The Czech’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Chennai Challenger.
Svrcina has an aggregate 16-18 win-loss record in 2024, 8-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Roca Batalla | Svrcina |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 18 |
| Pts | 62-34 | 63-51 |
| Total Points | 96 | 114 |
| Winners | 19 | 26 |
| %Winners | 31% | 41% |
Both Roca Batalla and Svrcina played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Roca Batalla and Svrcina have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Roca Batalla played 5 games less than Svrcina. Oriol scored 19 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech made 26 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Roca Batalla | Svrcina |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 25/42 | 34/64 |
| %1st in | 60% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 26/34 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 12/30 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 40% |
Roca Batalla didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Svrcina struck 3 aces . Roca Batalla won 76% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Svrcina won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Roca Batalla | Svrcina |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 67% | 71% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Spaniard broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Roca Batalla extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 4 break points. Svrcina broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Roca Batalla | |||
| R1 Fanselow |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 62-34 | 62-34 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 25/42 | 25/42 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 19/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Svrcina | |||
| R1 Lamasine |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 63-51 | 63-51 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 34/64 | 34/64 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/30 | 12/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLLWWWL
WLLLLWLWLL Tennis Scores in Bonn Challenger
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Raphael CollignonCollignon (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Daniel MasurMasur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-1 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Jakub NicodNicod (7-69 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Yanaki MilevMilev (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Marko TopoTopo (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin KlizanKlizan – Justin EngelEngel (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Chris RodeschRodesch (6-2 7-69) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Jakub NicodNicod (7-6(9) 6-3) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Daniel MasurMasur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-1 6-7(5) 6-2) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Yanaki MilevMilev (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin KlizanKlizan – Justin EngelEngel (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Raphael CollignonCollignon (7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Marko TopoTopo (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hugo DellienDellien – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Martin KlizanKlizan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (1-1) – H2H and prediction
