Joris De Loore and Beibit Zhukayev will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Ilkley Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 4:00 pm on SHOW COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Beibit Zhukayev who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Beibit Zhukayev is the pick to win this match.
Beibit Zhukayev -> 1.85
Joris De Loore -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Joris De Loore vs. Beibit Zhukayev
There is no head to head record between Joris De Loore and Beibit Zhukayev since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Joris De Loore
11 - 15win/loss
327
142
LWLWLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-21 | 3-4 | 7-10 | 5-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-25 | 5-3 | 10-8 | 27-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-18 | 14-4 | 22-10 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-8 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 10-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 190, De Loore got to the qualifications after beating Damir Dzumhur 6-2 4-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, De Loore defeated Dzumhur (6-2 4-6 6-3). During the match, De Loore scored 89 points vs Dzumhur’s 76. The Belgian was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, De Loore struck 10 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Joris De Loore was very effective on serve to win 79% (42/53) of his 1st serve and 55% (22/40) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Belgian broke Dzumhur 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
De Loore has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 65% of his matches (272-148). 1-0 on grass in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, De Loore has an overall 6-5 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
The Belgian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Lille Challenger.
The Belgian has a composed 11-14 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ilkley Challenger
Beibit Zhukayev
16 - 15win/loss
243
171
LWLLLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-29 | 14-16 | 6-4 | 4-5 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 19-16 | 1-3 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 43-30 | 33-21 | 1-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 13-10 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 193, the Kazakhstani reached the qualifications after defeating Jaime Faria 6-3 6-75 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Kazakhstani defeated Faria (6-3 6-75 6-1). During the match Zhukayev scored 96 points vs Faria’s 78. Beibit was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Zhukayev made 17 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Beibit Zhukayev was very effective on serve to win 79% (48/61) of his 1st serve and 64% (18/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Zhukayev broke Faria 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Zhukayev has an aggregate 15-15 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ilkley Challenger
Zhukayev has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Loore | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 29 |
| Pts | 89-76 | 96-78 |
| Total Points | 165 | 174 |
| Winners | 42 | 48 |
| %Winners | 47% | 50% |
Both De Loore and Zhukayev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Joris De Loore conceded 1 set, while Beibit Zhukayev conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, De Loore and Zhukayev have played the same amount of sets 3. However, De Loore played 2 games less than Zhukayev. The Belgian scored 42 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Kazakhstani made 48 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Loore | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 17 |
| 1st in | 53/93 | 61/89 |
| %1st in | 57% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 42/53 | 48/61 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 22/40 | 18/28 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 64% |
De Loore struck 10 aces . Zhukayev made 17 aces . De Loore won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Zhukayev won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Loore | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 75% | 50% |
| Conceded | 8 | 4 |
| Saved | 7 | 3 |
| % Saved | 88% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Belgian broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Joris lost his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. The Kazakhstani broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Kazakhstani conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Loore | |||
| Q1 Dzumhur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 89-76 | 89-76 | |
| Total points | 165 | 165 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 53/93 | 53/93 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 42/53 | 42/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/40 | 22/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Zhukayev | |||
| Q1 Faria |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-75 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 96-78 | 96-78 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 17 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 61/89 | 61/89 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 48/61 | 48/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/28 | 18/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLL
LWLLLWWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Emilio NavaNava (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- George LoffhagenLoffhagen – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Christian GarinGarin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
