Adrian Mannarino and Gijs Brouwer will square off in the 2nd round of the Libema Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adrian Mannarino who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adrian Mannarino is the pick to win this match.
Adrian Mannarino -> 1.363
Gijs Brouwer -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adrian Mannarino vs. Gijs Brouwer
This will be the 2nd time that Adrian Mannarino and Gijs Brouwer fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Brouwer (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they fought against each other, Brouwer won 6-3 6-4 6-4 in the 1st round in at the U.S. Open back in 2022.
Highlights Gijs Brouwer vs Adrian Mannarino – U.S. Open 30-August-2022
Adrian Mannarino
8 - 15win/loss
66
17
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-33 | 9-17 | 0-5 | 7-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-29 | 15-13 | 2-8 | 15-4 | 12-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-32 | 18-14 | 1-6 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 14-26 | 5-7 | 0-7 | 5-8 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-17 | 8-7 | 0-3 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 21, Adrian got to the 2nd round after beating Stefano Napolitano 3-6 7-65 6-2.
In the 1st round against Napolitano, Mannarino recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 6-2).During the match, Mannarino scored less points (3) than Napolitano. In fact, the world no. 21 won 100 points vs Napolitano’s. That means that Mannarino was more focused during the important points. Mannarino was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mannarino fired 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Adrian Mannarino lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Mannarino put 58% of his first serves in, winning 68% (42/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (21/45) on the 2nd serve. Adrian broke Napolitano 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Mannarino has positive record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (296-270). 1-0 on grass in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mannarino has a composed 60-36 record in the last years on grass.
Adrian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in Australia and Dallas.
The French player has a compiled 8-14 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Gijs Brouwer
20 - 16win/loss
177
114
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 31-27 | 14-12 | 6-5 | 4-5 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-34 | 5-8 | 3-6 | 12-15 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
2022 | 47-27 | 12-5 | 13-5 | 14-12 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 47-25 | 9-5 | 12-10 | 21-10 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
2020 | 20-10 | 13-4 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 232, Gijs reached the 2nd round after defeating Nicolas Moreno De Alboran 6-3 6-76 6-1, Cristian Garin 6-4 4-6 7-63 and Jakub Mensik 6-1 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Brouwer defeated Mensik (6-1 3-6 6-3). During the match Brouwer scored 88 points vs Mensik’s 76. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Brouwer fired 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Gijs Brouwer lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Brouwer put 71% of his first serves in, winning 66% (42/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the 2nd serve. Gijs broke Mensik 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
The Dutch’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Noumea Challenger.
Gijs has a compiled 19-16 win-loss record in 2024, 5-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mannarino | Brouwer |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 9 |
Tot Games | 30 | 87 |
Pts | 100-103 | 277-244 |
Total Points | 203 | 521 |
Winners | 42 | 144 |
%Winners | 42% | 52% |
Mannarino played 1 match while Brouwer competed in 3 matches. Brouwer started his run from the qualifications while Mannarino had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Adrian Mannarino dropped 1 set, while Gijs Brouwer surrendered 3 sets. Mannarino has played 6 set(s) less than Brouwer (3 vs 9). Therefore, Mannarino played 57 games less than Brouwer. The French player scored 42 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch made 144 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mannarino | Brouwer |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 10 |
Avg per match | 7 | 3.3 |
1st in | 62/107 | 201/271 |
%1st in | 58% | 74% |
1st pts | 42/62 | 144/201 |
%1st pts | 68% | 72% |
2nd pts | 21/45 | 43/70 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 61% |
Mannarino managed to score 7 aces . Brouwer fired 10 aces (3.3 per match). Mannarino won 68% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Brouwer won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mannarino | Brouwer |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 10 |
Converted | 4/6 | 10/19 |
% Converted | 67% | 53% |
Conceded | 10 | 18 |
Saved | 7 | 13 |
% Saved | 70% | 72% |
Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The French player dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. Brouwer broke his opponents 10 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 72% of the break points that he conceded.
Mannarino | |||
R1 Napolitano |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 7-65 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 100-103 | 100-103 | |
Total points | 203 | 203 | |
Winners | 42 | 42 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 62/107 | 62/107 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 42/62 | 42/62 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 21/45 | 21/45 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 7/10 | 7 | |
Saved % | 70% | 70% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Brouwer | |||||
Q1 Moreno De Alboran |
Q3 Garin |
R1 Mensik |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-76 6-1 | 6-4 4-6 7-63 | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 33 | 25 | 87 | |
pts | 89-71 | 100-97 | 88-76 | 277-244 | |
Total points | 160 | 197 | 164 | 521 | |
Winners | 48 | 54 | 42 | 144 | |
%Winners | 54% | 54% | 48% | 52% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 58/81 | 79/100 | 64/90 | 201/271 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 79% | 71% | 74% | |
1st pts | 48/58 | 54/79 | 42/64 | 144/201 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 68% | 66% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 17/23 | 11/21 | 15/26 | 43/70 | |
% 2nd pts | 74% | 52% | 58% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 3/6 | 4/5 | 10/19 | |
Converted % | 38% | 50% | 80% | 53% | |
Conceded | 0 | 9 | 9 | 18 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 6/9 | 7/9 | 13 | |
Saved % | – | 67% | 78% | 145% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Jakub MensikMensik (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (3-6 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (6-4 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FilsFils – Arthur CazauxCazaux (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Milos RaonicRaonic – Jordan ThompsonThompson (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (6-73 7-67 7-63) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Max PurcellPurcell (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (7-67 6-2) – See score progression
- Robin Haase/Skander MansouriHaase/Skander Mansouri – Tallon Griekspoor/David PelGriekspoor/David Pel (6-2 3-6 12-10) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – David GoffinGoffin (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Milos RaonicRaonic (0-5) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Tommy PaulPaul (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian KordaKorda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction