Paul Jubb and Fajing Sun will face off in the qualifications of the Busan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.27
Fajing Sun -> 3.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Fajing Sun
There is no head to head record between Paul Jubb and Fajing Sun since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-24 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 9-4 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 423, the Brit got to the qualifications after beating Jea Moon Lee 6-3 4-6 7-62.
In the qualifications, Paul defeated Moon Lee (6-3 4-6 7-62). During the match, Jubb scored 117 points vs Moon Lee’s 107. Paul was pretty aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jubb scored 6 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve 3 times and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 61% of his first serves in, winning 66% (48/73) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (25/47) on the 2nd serve. Jubb broke Moon Lee 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Jubb has a fantastic record in the last 8 years having won 70% of his matches (183-79). 5-2 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Jubb has an overall98-37 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Brit’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Glasgow Challenger.
The Brit has a compiled 14-8 win-loss record in 2024, 5-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Busan Challenger
Paul has never competed in this tournament before.
Fajing Sun
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-21 | 31-17 | 7-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-27 | 25-22 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-22 | 32-18 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 440, the Chinese reached the qualifications after beating Egor Gerasimov 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications, Sun had a good straight sets win against Gerasimov (7-5 6-2). During the match Sun scored 72 points vs Gerasimov’s 56. The Chinese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Sun was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Fajing Sun lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Sun put 71% of his first serves in, winning 67% (31/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the 2nd serve. Fajing broke Gerasimov 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Sun’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Creteil.
The Chinese has an overall 5-5 win-loss record in 2024, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Sun |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 20 |
| Pts | 117-107 | 72-56 |
| Total Points | 224 | 128 |
| Winners | 48 | 31 |
| %Winners | 41% | 43% |
Both Jubb and Sun played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Paul Jubb conceded 1 set while Fajing Sun hasn’t conceded a set so far. Jubb has played 1 set more than Sun (3 vs 2). Therefore, Jubb played 12 games more than Sun. The Brit scored 48 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese managed to score 31 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Sun |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 0 |
| 1st in | 73/120 | 46/65 |
| %1st in | 61% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 48/73 | 31/46 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 25/47 | 12/19 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 63% |
Jubb fired 6 aces . Sun didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Jubb won 66% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Sun won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Sun |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 44% | 44% |
| Conceded | 15 | 6 |
| Saved | 12 | 5 |
| % Saved | 80% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Jubb broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Brit dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Fajing broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jubb | |||
| Q1 Moon Lee |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 117-107 | 117-107 | |
| Total points | 224 | 224 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 73/120 | 73/120 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 48/73 | 48/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/47 | 25/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 12/15 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Sun | |||
| Q1 Gerasimov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 72-56 | 72-56 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/65 | 46/65 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 31/46 | 31/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWWLW
WWWLLLWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Yunseong ChungChung (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Richard BerankisBerankis (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sanhui ShinShin – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Tung-Lin WuWu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – Blake EllisEllis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanki ErelErel – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
